BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 2 Compliance Program Implementation and Ethical Decision-Making

• BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 2

Understanding Upcoding in Healthcare

Upcoding is a fraudulent billing practice where providers use incorrect codes to represent more expensive services or procedures than those delivered. This intentional misrepresentation is aimed at maximizing reimbursements from programs such as Medicare. According to Hilal et al. (2021), upcoding poses a significant financial threat to the healthcare system, diverting valuable resources that could otherwise be used to improve patient care. For example, a healthcare provider may bill for a 60-minute counselling session when only a 15-minute session was conducted (Dehnavi et al., 2021).

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is concerned about upcoding’s prevalence and financial impact. Beyond the financial implications, healthcare abuse like kickbacks exacerbates the issue by incentivizing providers to recommend unnecessary treatments or medications in exchange for financial benefits. This unethical practice prioritizes profit over patient welfare, undermining trust in healthcare providers and potentially exposing patients to unnecessary or harmful treatments (Bosley, 2024).

Legal and Ethical Safeguards

The Stark Law

Originally known as the Physician Self-Referral Law, the Stark Law prohibits physicians from referring patients to facilities in which they have a financial interest, except under specific exceptions. This legislation aims to safeguard patient welfare by preventing conflicts of interest that could compromise care quality. Addressing such unethical practices, the Stark Law reinforces the importance of delivering unbiased, patient-centred care (Bosley, 2024).

Healthcare Fraud and Abuse Laws

Healthcare fraud, including medical identity theft and billing fraud, has far-reaching consequences for patients and the healthcare system. Medical identity theft, where one person uses another’s information to access healthcare services, can significantly harm victims and cause financial losses across the system (Lopatina et al., 2021). The False Claims Act (FCA), established by the U.S. Department of Justice, addresses fraudulent billing practices by penalizing individuals or entities that submit false claims for reimbursement. The FCA also encourages whistleblowers to report fraud, emphasizing the need for early intervention to prevent repeated violations (U.S. Department of Justice, 2024).

Similarly, the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) criminalizes the exchange of remuneration for referrals in federal healthcare programs. AKS violations compromise patient safety and attract severe penalties, including fines and imprisonment (U.S. Department of Justice, 2024). Compliance with these laws is essential for preserving the integrity of the healthcare system and ensuring ethical decision-making—a core focus of BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 2.

Evidence-Based Recommendations to Address Upcoding

Compliance Training

Frequent and comprehensive compliance training is crucial for fostering ethical practices among healthcare providers. Training sessions should focus on accurate billing and coding practices aligned with regulatory standards. These initiatives, central to BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 2, help reduce upcoding by keeping staff updated on coding regulations and ethical obligations.

Staff Education

Educational workshops and seminars are essential for equipping healthcare professionals with the knowledge and skills to ensure accurate coding and documentation. Refresher courses on coding principles can enhance the identification of patient encounters and the appropriate coding rates assigned. Enhanced training reduces errors and prevents intentional or unintentional upcoding.

Technology for Detection

Investing in advanced billing software is another effective measure to combat upcoding. Automated systems can monitor billing processes in real time, flagging discrepancies as they occur. Data analytics tools can identify irregularities in billing codes, prompting further investigation to uncover upcoding schemes. Such technological interventions are integral to maintaining compliance and enhancing transparency.

Regular Audits and Monitoring

Periodic audits of billing records help identify patterns of upcoding and other fraudulent practices. By analyzing discrepancies between charges and patient records, healthcare organizations can detect and address compliance breaches. Continuous monitoring ensures adherence to coding standards and minimizes the risk of violations.

Whistleblower Reward System

Introducing a whistleblower reward system can encourage employees to report fraudulent practices like upcoding. This system protects whistleblowers from retaliation and fosters a culture of accountability within the organization. Encouraging staff to report violations directly to management ensures timely action and reinforces ethical standards in healthcare.

Conclusion

Upcoding undermines the integrity of the healthcare system, compromising patient trust and diverting resources from genuine care needs. Legal frameworks like the Stark Law, FCA, and AKS safeguard against fraudulent practices. However, healthcare organizations must implement proactive measures to prevent upcoding. Evidence-based strategies, including compliance training, technological solutions, and regular audits, are essential for maintaining transparency and accountability.

As emphasized in BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 2, fostering a culture of ethical decision-making and compliance is vital for upholding the standards of care and trust in healthcare. By addressing the root causes of upcoding and promoting ethical practices, healthcare providers can safeguard patient welfare and ensure the sustainability of the healthcare system.

Read more about BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 1 Compliance Program Implementation and Ethical Decision-Making for complete information about this class.

References

Bhati, D., Deogade, M. S., & Kanyal, D. (2023). Improving patient outcomes through effective hospital administration: A comprehensive review. Cureus, 15(10).

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47731

Bosley, S. (2024, February 6). What Are Kickbacks? TZ Legal – Fraud Fighters.

https://www.fraudfighters.net/news/what-are-kickbacks/

CMI. (2021). Pharmaceutical companies’ payments to healthcare professionals: an eclipse of global transparency. U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre.

https://www.u4.no/blog/pharmaceutical-payments-to-healthcare-professionals

CMS. (2020). CMS announces historic changes to physician self-referral regulations. Cms.gov.

https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-announces-historic-changes-physician-self-referral-regulations

Consulting, Y. H. (2024, February 27). Healthcare Compliance Training: Importance & Benefits of Training. Consulting, Inc.

https://yes-himconsulting.com/the-importance-and-benefits-of-healthcare-compliance-training-programs/

Dehnavi, Z., Ayatollahi, H., Hemmat, M., & Abbasi, R. (2021). Upcoding Medicare: Are Healthcare fraud and abuse increasing? Perspectives in Health Information Management, 18(4), 1f.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649706/

Drabiak, K., & Wolfson, J. (2020). What should healthcare organizations do to reduce billing fraud and abuse? American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, 22(3), 221–231.

https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2020.221.

Ferry, J., & Medlin, L. E. (2022). The False Claims Act. Springer, 277–292.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08162-0_17

Geruso, M., & Layton, T. (2020). Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on squishy risk adjustment. Journal of Political Economy, 128(3), 984–1026.

https://doi.org/10.1086/704756

Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2021). A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications in Financial Fraud. Expert Systems with Applications, 193(1), 116429.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429

Jennings, W. (2022). Fraud Investigation and Forensic Accounting in the Real World.

https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003121558

Lin, J., & Pantano, J. (2023). Hospital Upcoding Decisions under Medicare Audits.

https://www.jianjinglin.com/uploads/9/0/8/4/90844182/cert.pdf

Lopatina, K., Dokuchaev, V. A., & Maklachkova, V. V. (2021, October 1). Data Risks Identification in Healthcare Sensor Networks. IEEE Xplore.

https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCTECH53459.2021.9619178

US Department of Justice. (2024, February 23). The False Claims Act. Justice.gov; U.S. Department of Justice.

https://www.justice.gov/civil/false-claims-act

Vian, T., Agnew, B., & McInnes, K. (2022). Whistleblowing as an anti-corruption strategy in health and pharmaceutical organizations in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Global Health Action, 15(1).

https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2140494