BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 3 Quantitative Research Questions and Methods

• BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 3

Introduction

Quantitative research methods are instrumental in studying situations or events that impact individuals, providing measurable and precise data for analysis. They allow researchers to pose questions that include numerical values, leading to accurate and objective findings. Developing a well-crafted quantitative research question is essential, as is selecting an appropriate methodology to answer it.

For this assessment, the chosen research question focuses on older adults experiencing pressure sores after post-abdominal surgery in the U.S. It examines the role of medical facilities in ensuring patient safety precautions. This study aligns with the objectives of BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 3, which emphasizes the importance of quantitative approaches in addressing healthcare challenges.

Quantitative Research Question

Research Question:
How often do medical healthcare facilities ensure that patient safety precautions are correctly followed to prevent the development of pressure sores in post-abdominal surgery procedures?

Hypotheses

• H1 (Alternative Hypothesis): Medical healthcare facilities ensure that patient safety precautions are correctly followed to prevent the development of pressure sores in post-abdominal surgery procedures.
• H0 (Null Hypothesis): Medical healthcare facilities do not ensure that patient safety precautions are correctly followed to prevent the development of pressure sores in post-abdominal surgery procedures.

Quantitative Methods and Data Collection

Quantitative research methods involve the statistical analysis of numerical data, making the findings measurable and reliable. These methods are categorized into different types, such as descriptive, correlational, experimental, and quasi-experimental approaches. Each offers unique advantages in analyzing healthcare data and addressing research problems (Awali et al., 2018).

Types of Quantitative Methods

1. Correlational: This method examines relationships between variables to determine the strength and direction of their connection. For example, it can explore the relationship between healthcare facilities’ safety measures and the incidence of pressure sores.
2. Descriptive: Descriptive methods involve characterizing variables to understand a particular phenomenon. For instance, researchers may use this approach to study the prevalence of pressure sores among older adults post-surgery.
3. Experimental: Experimental methods manipulate variables to understand their effects. This might involve creating intervention and control groups to evaluate the effectiveness of specific safety protocols in reducing pressure sores.
4. Quasi-Experimental: Quasi-experimental methods investigate causal relationships but lack randomization. This approach is practical when ethical or logistical constraints make random assignment challenging (Moser & Korstjens, 2018).

In this study, the correlational method is particularly significant for understanding the relationship between healthcare facilities and the development of pressure sores. It helps validate the hypothesis by identifying critical trends and variables.

Quantitative Data Collection Tools and Strategies

Quantitative data collection involves gathering numerical data through structured tools and strategies. These tools help researchers categorize variables as dependent (outcome) or independent (influencing factors) and analyze the data effectively.

Common Tools and Strategies

1. Surveys and Questionnaires: Surveys are designed with structured questions that often begin with “how much” or “how often,” making them ideal for quantitative studies. Online surveys and rating scales ensure ease of data collection and analysis.
2. Observations: Researchers collect data by observing participants’ behaviors or actions in specific settings. For example, they may count instances of safety protocol adherence in healthcare facilities.
3. Probability Sampling: This sampling technique uses random selection methods, ensuring the representativeness of the target population and enabling generalizations from the data collected.
4. Person-to-Person Interviews: Structured interviews provide a clear framework for collecting statistical data. Researchers adhere to a predetermined set of questions to ensure consistency and reliability (Heath et al., 2018).

For this study, close-ended questions will be used to collect data efficiently. These questions save participants’ time while providing direct responses that can establish the relationship between pressure sore prevention and healthcare facility practices.

Importance of Targeted Data Collection

Targeted data collection is crucial for addressing specific healthcare challenges, such as pressure sore prevention. By focusing on relevant variables, researchers can develop actionable insights to improve patient outcomes.

In BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 3, the data will be gathered from older adults and healthcare facilities, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between safety measures and the incidence of pressure sores. This targeted approach will help identify gaps in care and provide a foundation for actionable solutions.

Advantages and Challenges of Interviews

Advantages

• Depth of Insight: Interviews allow researchers to gain valuable perspectives and detailed information from participants.
• Flexibility: Researchers can adapt questions or explore new areas of interest during the interview.
• Verification: Interviews enable real-time validation of data for accuracy and relevance.
• Human Connection: Interviews foster a personal connection, encouraging participants to share honest and thoughtful responses (Heath et al., 2018).

Challenges

• Standardization Issues: Variability in questions or responses can affect data consistency.
• Resource Intensity: Interviews can be time-consuming and costly to conduct.
• Limited Anonymity: Participants may feel less inclined to share sensitive information due to the lack of anonymity.
• Misrepresentation: Cultural or contextual misunderstandings may lead to inaccurate interpretations of data (Clark & Vealé, 2018).

Despite these challenges, interviews remain a vital tool for collecting qualitative and quantitative data in healthcare research.

Conclusion

Quantitative methods provide a systematic approach to addressing healthcare research questions. By focusing on measurable data and using structured tools like surveys, observations, and probability sampling, researchers can gain valuable insights into healthcare challenges such as pressure sore prevention.

As emphasized in BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 3, selecting appropriate quantitative methodologies and tools is crucial for ensuring accurate and reliable results. This approach not only improves current health practices but also lays the groundwork for long-term solutions that benefit patients and healthcare providers alike.

Read more BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 2 Qualitative Research Questions and Methods about for complete information about this class.

References

Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18(1), 1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596

Awali, Z. M., Nagshabandi, E. A., & Elgmail, A. (2018). The Effect of Implementing Pressure Ulcer Prevention Educational Protocol on Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practices. Nursing & Primary Care, 2(4), 1–7.

https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9474.1077

Clark, K. R., & Vealé, B. L. (2018). Strategies to enhance data collection and analysis in qualitative research. Radiologic Technology, 89(5), 482CT485CT.

http://www.radiologictechnology.org/content/89/5/482CT.extract

Coleman, S., Nixon, J., Keen, J., Wilson, L., McGinnis, E., Dealey, C., Stubbs, N., Farrin, A., Dowding, D., Schols, J. M. G. A., Cuddigan, J., Berlowitz, D., Jude, E., Vowden, P., Schoonhoven, L., Bader, D. L., Gefen, A., Oomens, C. W. J., & Nelson, E. A. (2017). A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(10), 2222–2234.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12405

Ebi, W. E., Hirko, G. F., & Mijena, D. A. (2019). Nurses’ knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention in public hospitals in Wollega: a cross-sectional study design. BMC Nursing, 18(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0346-y

Heath, J., Williamson, H., Williams, L., & Harcourt, D. (2018). “It’s just more personal”: Using multiple qualitative data collection methods to facilitate participation in research focusing on sensitive subjects. Applied Nursing Research, 43, 30–35.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2018.06.015

Kaur, N., Vedel, I., El Sherif, R., & Pluye, P. (2019). Practical mixed methods strategies used to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in community-based primary health care research. Family Practice, 36(5), 666–671.

https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmz010

Lavallée, J. F., Gray, T. A., Dumville, J., & Cullum, N. (2019). Preventing pressure ulcers in nursing homes using a care bundle: A feasibility study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 27(4).

https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12742

Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. Sagepub.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875

McGrath, C., Palmgren, P. J., & Liljedahl, M. (2018). Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 1–5. Tandfonline.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1497149

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. Tandfonline.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091

Quantitative Analysis of Pressure Ulcers. (n.d.). NursingAnswers.net.

https://nursinganswers.net/essays/quantitative-analysis-of-pressure-ulcers.php