Capella 4035 Assessment 3

Capella 4035 Assessment 3

Student Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX4035 Enhancing Patient Safety and Quality of Care

Prof. Name

Date

Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

Hello everyone, and thank you for attending today’s in-service training. I am Lori, and today I will present on a crucial patient safety issue that occurred during a nurse shift transition: a communication breakdown during handoff that led to a severe adverse outcome. In this incident, a 68-year-old COPD patient experienced a worsening respiratory condition. Due to incomplete handoff communication, vital updates about the patient’s declining status and medication changes were not conveyed to the oncoming nurse. As a result, timely respiratory support was delayed, leading to respiratory distress and requiring emergency intervention. This situation was exacerbated by short staffing, limited EHR documentation, and missed verbal updates. Today’s session focuses on how such handoff failures impact patient safety and introduces evidence-based strategies to enhance communication, reduce risk, and promote better outcomes.

Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes

This session addresses the dangers of communication lapses during nurse shift changes, especially when caring for chronically ill patients like those with COPD. Our main objective is to strengthen handoff processes to prevent missed care, medication errors, and intervention delays. The sentinel event involving the COPD patient revealed that critical updates were omitted during the shift transition, primarily due to staff shortages, rushed handoffs, vague role definitions, and poor EHR documentation. The session highlights interventions including SBAR, I-PASS, closed-loop communication, and designated handoff areas to ensure accurate and complete information exchange.

Goals

The initiative targets the underlying causes of handoff-related communication failures, particularly those contributing to the COPD patient incident. Key contributing factors were identified as understaffing, rushed or unstructured handoffs, unclear roles, and a lack of proper documentation in the EHR. Research emphasizes that communication breakdowns during handoffs are a primary cause of preventable clinical deterioration (Schroers et al., 2021). Standardized communication tools and structured handoff practices can mitigate these risks. This session also seeks to instill real-time updates via EHR, encourage closed-loop communication, and establish protected, distraction-free handoff environments.

Through these strategies, our goal is to minimize preventable harm and support a culture of safety. The discussion includes how communication errors impact patient outcomes and provider well-being, often increasing scrutiny and healthcare resource use (Louis et al., 2024). The session concludes with a live demonstration of an effective handoff to reinforce practical application.

Outcomes

Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan

Patient Handoff Interruptions

Patient handoffs in high-intensity environments like ICUs pose safety risks, as critical information can be lost or distorted. The absence of standardized communication frameworks further compounds these vulnerabilities. According to Reime et al. (2024), communication errors during handoffs account for over 80% of sentinel events in hospitals. The lack of a uniform system like SBAR results in hurried, incomplete exchanges that can delay treatment or cause medication errors.

Nurses often juggle multiple responsibilities and face time constraints that hinder thorough documentation and handoffs. Without designated handoff periods and policies to reduce interruptions, essential patient information may be overlooked, risking severe complications. Introducing standardized tools and institutional support for protected handoff times is vital to patient safety and care continuity.

Process for Safety Improvement

Implications of Handoff Errors

Interruptions and inaccuracies in patient handoffs are a significant safety concern. These failures lead to missed diagnoses, treatment delays, and adverse events. Studies show communication lapses during transitions account for most sentinel events (Reime et al., 2024). These breakdowns also increase patient morbidity, hospital stays, and resource use, while placing healthcare facilities at risk of litigation and accreditation loss. Moreover, frequent interruptions undermine morale and contribute to burnout and turnover. Solutions include structured formats like SBAR, distraction-reduction policies (e.g., quiet zones), and EHR-integrated handoff templates that uphold continuity, diagnostic accuracy, and safety standards.

Part 3: Audience’s Role and Importance

Role in Implementing and Driving the Plan

The success of this plan hinges on collaboration among nurses, physicians, IT, and leadership. Effective shift transitions depend on the consistent application of tools like SBAR and EHR-integrated templates. Nurses play a vital role by actively engaging in simulation training, providing feedback, and following quiet zone protocols. According to Janagama et al. (2020), reducing communication interruptions directly lessens diagnostic delays and enhances safety. Leaders must allocate resources, enforce policies, and support staff in adhering to new procedures, cultivating a culture of reliability and excellence.

Audience Critical for Plan’s Success

Nurses, as the primary facilitators of handoff communications, are central to implementing this improvement strategy. Their dedication to using structured tools like SBAR and participating in technology-enhanced workflows determines the success of reducing communication-related harm.

References

Atinga, R. A., Abekah-Nkrumah, G., Domfeh, K. A., & Adjei, F. (2024). The role of electronic health tools in improving medication safety: A systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 36(1), mzad015. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzad015

Janagama, R., Balaji, G., & Iqbal, J. (2020). Interruptions in clinical communication and patient safety: A review. BMJ Open Quality, 9(1), e000795. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000795

Louis, K., Zhang, C., & Qian, Y. (2024). Enhancing clinical communication: Impact of structured handoffs and technology-enabled processes. Journal of Patient Safety, 20(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001045

Capella 4035 Assessment 3

Nawawi, N. M., & Ibrahim, F. (2024). Improving nursing medication administration through digital training and simulation. Nursing Informatics Today, 19(2), 84-92.

Reime, B., Weber, M., & Lang, G. (2024). Handoff communication failures and sentinel events: A systematic review. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 50(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.11.001

Risani, P., Lestari, S., & Yusuf, R. (2024). SBAR implementation and its effects on nurse communication: A clinical study. Journal of Nursing Practice, 18(1), 65-72.

Schroers, G., Ross, J., & Patrician, P. (2021). Communication during handoffs: A narrative review and implications for nursing practice. Nursing Outlook, 69(5), 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2021.03.006