digitalmediawritings

Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion

Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Case Study

The study presents patient DC’s case, which involves a 46-year-old female. The patient has a 24-hour RUQ pain history which began one year after dinner with her family. The main symptoms presented include vomiting and nausea. In that regard, the paper will assess the patient’s diagnosis, appropriate drug therapy, and drug therapy recommendation justification.

The Patient Diagnosis

The primary diagnosis of patient DC is cholecystitis. According to Gallaher and Charles (2022), cholecystitis refers to gallbladder inflammation, with the main symptoms being vomiting, nausea, and abdomen tenderness similar to thee case study patient. Consequently, cholecystitis symptoms begin once an individual takes a meal, particularly a fatty or large one for the patient, and the pain begins after consuming a large dinner with her family. Also, when comparing the cholecystitis pain to that of biliary colic, which may be a differential diagnosis is that in biliary colic, the pain lasts for a few hours (Veronica et al., 2019)Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion. Another fact to consider that ascertains cholecystitis is her elevated leukocyte count at 13000, /mm3, which is usually consistent with chronic or acute cholecystitis. In addition, nausea and vomiting may be attributed to medication such as Lisinopril 10 mg daily, essential for the patient to control her hypertension state. Hence, during drug therapy, there is a need to evaluate if the medication needs to be reduced. Also, considering that the patient is taking HCTZ 25 mg daily, essential to treat high blood pressure, its side effects include stomach pains which may cause minimal abdominal tenderness. Hence, there will be a need to ensure that further examination is conducted to identify the main cause of these issues.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Appropriate Drug Therapy

The main aim of pharmacotherapy in treating diseases includes reducing morbidity and preventing complications. According to Vagholkar (2020), antiemetics and analgesics are the most effective drug therapy that may be appropriate for a cholecystitis patient. However, it will also be essential first to withdraw HCTZ 25 mg daily since it plays a similar role to Lisinopril 10mg daily considering that it exposes the patient to more adverse effects.

Drug Therapy Justification

Antiemetics like prochlorperazine 5 to 10 mg will be appropriate for patient DC which will be essential in relieving vomiting and nausea (Eakin et al., 2020). Acetamophine will also be effective for the patient since it will help relieve pain episodes with doses not exceeding 4 g/24 hr. Considerably, the withdrawal of HCTZ 25mg daily will help assess the patient’s severity of abdominal pain, vomiting, and nausea since they are part of its side effects (Itoh et al., 2019). However, if the condition persists, the patient will have to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy since it is a preferred treatment for individuals with a projected longer life expectancy considering that the patient’s bilirubin level is at 0.8 mg/dL, thus indicating she has a longer life expectancy (Vagholkar, 2020)Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion.

Conclusion

The paper assessed a case study for a 46-year-old patient suspected of having cholecystitis. The main areas evaluated include appropriate diagnosis and its rationale and appropriate diagnosis and its justification.

References

Eakin, C. M., Norton, T. J., Monk, B. J., & Chase, D. M. (2020). Management of nausea and vomiting from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.016

Gallaher, J. R., & Charles, A. (2022). Acute Cholecystitis: A Review. JAMA, 327(10), 965–975. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.2350

Itoh, A., Hirano, K., Tanaka, N., Yoshioka, I., Shibuya, K., Watanabe, T., Kimura, N., Sugano, K., Okumura, T., & Fujii, T. (2019). Intravenous scheduled administration of acetaminophen in analgesia after pancreatectomy. HPB, 21, S450–S451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.2228

Vagholkar, Dr. K. (2020). Acute cholecystitis: Severity assessment and management. International Journal of Surgery Science, 4(2), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i2e.433

Veronica, B., Francesca, C., Luigi, L., De Gaetano, A. M., & Riccardo, M. (2019). Imaging of Biliary Colic and Cholecystitis. Pain Imaging, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99822-0_13

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
  • Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
  • Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

Case:

DC is a 46-year-old female who presents with a 24-hour history of RUQ pain.  She states the pain started about 1 hour after a large dinner she had with her family.  She has had nausea and on instance of vomiting before presentation Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion.

PMH: Vitals:
HTN Temp:  98.8F
Type II DM Wt:       202 lbs
Gout Ht:        5’8”
DVT – Caused by oral BCPs BP:       136/82
HR:       82 bpm

 

Current Medications: Notable Labs:
Lisinopril 10 mg daily WBC:                13,000/mm3
HCTZ 25 mg daily Total bilirubin:    0.8 mg/dL
Allopurinol 100 mg daily Direct bilirubin:  0.6 mg/dL
Multivitamin daily Alk Phos:           100 U/L
AST:                   45 U/L
ALT:                   30 U/L

Allergies:

  • Latex
  • Codeine
  • Amoxicillin

PE:

  • Eyes: EOMI
  • HENT: Normal
  • GI: Nondistended, minimal tenderness
  • Skin: Warm and dry
  • Neuro: Alert and Oriented
  • Psych: b Appropriate mood

This announcement is closed for comments

Gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary disorders affect the structure and function of the GI tract. Many of these disorders often have similar symptoms, such as abdominal pain, cramping, constipation, nausea, bloating, and fatigue. Since multiple disorders can be tied to the same symptoms, it is important for advanced practice nurses to carefully evaluate patients and prescribe a treatment that targets the cause rather than the symptom Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion.

Once the underlying cause is identified, an appropriate drug therapy plan can be recommended based on medical history and individual patient factors. In this Assignment, you examine a case study of a patient who presents with symptoms of a possible GI/hepatobiliary disorder, and you design an appropriate drug therapy plan.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment
  • Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.
  • Think about a possible diagnosis for the patient. Consider whether the patient has a disorder related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system or whether the symptoms are the result of a disorder from another system or other factors, such as pregnancy, drugs, or a psychological disorder.
  • Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
  • Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
  • Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion.

RESOURCES

Required Readings

  • Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants(2nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
    • Chapter 64, “Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease” (pp. 589–597)
    • Chapter 65, “Laxatives” (pp. 598–604)
    • Chapter 66, “Other Gastrointestinal Drugs” (pp. 605–616)
    • Chapter 80, “Antiviral Agents I: Drugs for Non-HIV Viral Infections” (pp. 723–743)

      ORDER HERE

  • Chalasani, N., Younossi, Z., Lavine, J. E., Charlton, M., Cusi, K., Rinella, M., . . . Sanya, A. J. (2018). The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver DiseasesLinks to an external site.. Hepatology, 67(1), 328–357. Retrieved from https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hep.29367

This article details the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Review this article to gain an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology as well as the suggested pharmacotherapeutics that might be recommended to treat this disorder. Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion

RUBRIC:

NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
25 to >22.25 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment.

22.25 to >19.75 pts

Good

The response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment.

19.75 to >17.25 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment.

17.25 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.
30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent

The response provides an accurate, clear, and detailed justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response includes specific, accurate, and detailed examples that fully support the justification provided.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response provides an inaccurate or vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response may include examples, which may inaccurately or vaguely support the justification provided.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response provides an inaccurate and vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient, or is missing. … The response does not include examples that support the justification provided, or is missing.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

ORDER NOW

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3–4) APA format errors

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors

5 pts
Total Points: 100

 Case Study For Appropriate Diagnosis Of Cholecystitis Discussion

Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.

ORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH

PLACE YOUR ORDER

SHARE WITH FRIENDS