digitalmediawritings

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me
Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template

Evaluation Table

 

Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

 

 

Full APA formatted citation of selected article. Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
 

 

 

 

     
Evidence Level *

(I, II, or III)

 

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper      
Conceptual Framework

 

Describe the theoretical basis for the study (If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here).**

 

 

 

 

 

     
Design/Method

 

Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria).

ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER 

     
Sample/Setting

 

The number and characteristics of

patients, attrition rate, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

     
Major Variables Studied

 

List and define dependent and independent variables

 

 

     
Measurement

 

Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions (You need to list the actual tests done).

       
Data Analysis Statistical or

Qualitative findings

 

(You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data).

       
Findings and Recommendations

 

General findings and recommendations of the research

       
Appraisal and Study Quality Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper

 

 

Describe the general worth of this research to practice.

 

What are the strengths and limitations of study?

 

What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research?

 

What is the feasibility of use in your practice?

       
 

 

Key findings

 

 

 

       
 

 

Outcomes

 

 

 

       
General Notes/Comments  

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

*These levels are from the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Evidence Level and Quality Guide

 

  • Level I

Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper

 

  • Level II

Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis

 

  • Level III

Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis

  • Level IV

Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence

  • Level V

Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence

 

 

**Note on Conceptual Framework

 

  • The following information is from Walden academic guides which helps explain conceptual frameworks and the reasons they are used in research. Here is the link https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework

 

  • Researchers create theoretical and conceptual frameworks that include a philosophical and methodological model to help design their work. A formal theory provides context for the outcome of the events conducted in the research. The data collection and analysis are also based on the theoretical and conceptual framework.

 

  • As stated by Grant and Osanloo (2014), “Without a theoretical framework, the structure and vision for a study is unclear, much like a house that cannot be constructed without a blueprint. By contrast, a research plan that contains a theoretical framework allows the dissertation study to be strong and structured with an organized flow from one chapter to the next.”

 

  • Theoretical and conceptual frameworks provide evidence of academic standards and procedure. They also offer an explanation of why the study is pertinent and how the researcher expects to fill the gap in the literature. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper

 

  • Literature does not always clearly delineate between a theoretical or conceptual framework. With that being said, there are slight differences between the two.

 

 

References

 

 

The Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins University (n.d.). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: appendix C: evidence level and quality guide. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/_docs/appendix_c_evidence_level_quality_guide.pdf
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your house. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26.

Walden University Academic Guides (n.d.). Conceptual & theoretical frameworks overview. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework

Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

 

 

Full APA formatted citation of selected article. Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Mejia-Lancheros, C., Lachaud, J., O’Campo, P., Wiens, K., Nisenbaum, R., Wang, R., … & Stergiopoulos, V. (2020). Trajectories and mental health-related predictors of perceived discrimination and stigma among homeless adults with mental illness. PloS one, 15(2), e0229385. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229385

 

 

 

Werremeyer, A., Mosher, S., Eukel, H., Skoy, E., Steig, J., Frenzel, O., & Strand, M. A. (2021). Pharmacists’ stigma toward patients engaged in opioid misuse: When “social distance” does not mean disease prevention. Substance Abuse42(4), 919-926. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1900988 Sherwood, D. A. (2019). Healthcare curriculum influences on stigma towards mental illness: Core psychiatry course impact on pharmacy, nursing and social work student attitudes. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning11(2), 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.001 Al Saif, F., Al Shakhoori, H., Nooh, S., & Jahrami, H. (2019). Association between attitudes of stigma toward mental illness and attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice within health care providers in Bahrain. PloS one, 14(12), e0225738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225738

 

Evidence Level *

(I, II, or III)

 

Level III Level III Level III Level III
Conceptual Framework

 

Describe the theoretical basis for the study (If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here).**

 

The article uses Group-Based Trajectory Model framework to evaluate discrimination and stigma trajectory groups.

 

 

No conceptual framework No conceptual framework No conceptual framework
Design/Method

 

Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria).

Home/Chez Soi randomized trial

Inclusion Criteria- Must be 18 year and homeless

Exclusion Criteria- individuals with mental illnesses but with no substance abuse

The study involves a survey on social distance.

Inclusion: Must be a pharmacist

Exclusion: Experience with a vignette patient

 

The study involved a survey on social work, pharmacy and nursing students.

Inclusion: Must be nursing, social work or pharmacy students.

Exclusion: Engaging in  a pre and post-course on stigmatization

The study engaged cross-sectional study.

Inclusion: the healthcare providers needed to be from primary care and mental health services.

Exclusion: The mental health services participants were from the country’s main psychiatric hospital

Sample/Setting

 

The number and characteristics of

patients, attrition rate, etc. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper

414 participants with discriminatory and stigma trajectories

 

 

 

187 participants to evaluate frequency and likelihood of social distance. Engaged 154 pre-course (12 social work, 47 nursing and 95 pharmacy) and 128 post-course nursing students in social work, pharmacy, and nursing (11 social work, 38 nursing and 79 pharmacy) 547 health care providers with 273 being primary care givers while 274 being from the mental health services.
Major Variables Studied

 

List and define dependent and independent variables

Dependent Variables– Discrimination and Stigma

Independent Variables- homelessness and mental disorders

 

Dependent variable- Opioid patients

Independent Variable- Pharmacists’ Social distance

Dependent Variable-Psychiatric coursework

Independent variable– Student’s perception

Dependent Variables- Mental ill patients

Independent variables- Clinician’s stigma attitudes

Measurement

 

Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions (You need to list the actual tests done).

Outcome and mental health measures to identify unfair treatment  due to a patient mental disorder Social distance scale, Attitudinal and demographics measurements. Stigma levels using the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) in pre and post The study engaged Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) and OMS-HC in measuring level of stigma among the clinicians.
Data Analysis Statistical or

Qualitative findings

 

(You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data).

Ethno-racial status and discrimination history within healthcare environment led to either high or low stigma trajectory group 59% respondents showed existence of SDS score OMS-HC was 30.6 ± 5.47 in pre-course and  31.05 ± 6.82 No statistical difference between the two scales since they resulted  to (p = 0.146)
Findings and Recommendations

General findings and recommendations of the research

Adults with mental health and homelessness face stigma and discrimination thus the need to engage effective policies to intervene the condition. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper Social distance leads to reduction of engaging the patients in therapeutic relationships Course work has no effect on improvement of healthcare providers and students. There were varying stigma levels for individuals that engaged in EBPAS thus the need for healthcare sector to engage in evidence-based practices
Appraisal and Study Quality

 

 

Describe the general worth of this research to practice.

 

What are the strengths and limitations of study?

 

What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research?

 

What is the feasibility of use in your practice?

The study is effective since it will reduce stigma and discrimination among the homeless patient population thus no risk in implementing the policy and its viable in my practice to ensure healthcare professional uphold work ethics to improve patient outcomes. The study is relevant since it helps identify the gap between pharmacists and opioid use patients. The policy is not inclusive since it involves only pharmacists with less than 10 years in opioid use disorder since those with over ten years also need refresher courses on how to deal with the issue. The study strength lies on its objectivity in evaluating bot pre- and post-course students’ perceptions. Hence, the study is essential to help healthcare educators formulate other means to reduce stigma among nurses. The study is effective since it proves the need to engage in evidence-based practices within healthcare for better patient outcomes.
 

 

Key findings

 

 

 

Various Mental disorders like major depressive disorder and being suicidal exposes patients to stigma and discrimination. Pharmacists did not see any issue performing their pharmacy duties to the opioid patients though social distance always happens when needed to form therapeutic relationships. Current healthcare education does not impact student perception on stigma. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper Mental health services participants had limited stigma instances compared to the participants from primary care services.
 

 

Outcomes

 

 

 

Need to engage in better strategies rather than housing first treatment. Such factors may increase cases of discrimination and stigmatizing opioid use patients. Such factor may lead these healthcare providers to continue subjecting the patients to stigma thus impacting the patient outcomes. There is a need to let mental health department deal more with mental health issues for better patient outcomes.
General Notes/Comments There is a need to implement policies for homeless people with mental disorders.

 

 

 

 

 

Pharmacists needs training to effectively know how to handle opioid use patients. More strategies to improve healthcare student perception before transitioning is essential. There is a need to establish more mental health care services to improve mental health patient well-being. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper

 

 

References

ORDER HERE

between attitudes of stigma toward mental illness and attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice within health care providers in Bahrain. PloS one, 14(12), e0225738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225738

Mejia-Lancheros, C., Lachaud, J., O’Campo, P., Wiens, K., Nisenbaum, R., Wang, R., … & Stergiopoulos, V. (2020). Trajectories and mental health-related predictors of perceived discrimination and stigma among homeless adults with mental illness. PloS one, 15(2), e0229385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229385

Sherwood, D. A. (2019). Healthcare curriculum influences on stigma towards mental illness: Core psychiatry course impact on pharmacy, nursing and social work student attitudes. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning11(2), 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.001

Werremeyer, A., Mosher, S., Eukel, H., Skoy, E., Steig, J., Frenzel, O., & Strand, M. A. (2021). Pharmacists’ stigma toward patients engaged in opioid misuse: When “social distance” does not mean disease prevention. Substance Abuse42(4), 919-926. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1900988

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

THIS WILL BE THIS ASSIGNMENT>>>>>> Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research. YOU WILL UTILIZE PART 3A TO COMPLETE PART 3B

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

8 RESOURCES – 4 ARTICLES, 2 OUTSIDE RESOURCES THAT SUPPORT and at least two course resources

Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-Based Practice: Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390309338733

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

Chapter 5, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 124–188)
Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–218)

Fineout-Overholt, E. , Melnyk, B. , Stillwell, S. B. & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practice Step by Step: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence: Part I. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 110 (7), 47-52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c.

Fineout-Overholt, E. , Melnyk, B. M. , Stillwell, S. B. & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence: Part II. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 110 (9), 41-48. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Paper

 

Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.

ORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH

PLACE YOUR ORDER

SHARE WITH FRIENDS