NR 544 Week 3 Quality Improvement Model Application

NR 544 Week 3 Quality Improvement Model Application

Student Name

Chamberlain University

NR-544: Quality & Safety in Healthcare

Prof. Name

Date

Introduction and Patient Safety Issue

Ensuring patient safety is a foundational aspect of modern healthcare. One of the persistent challenges in hospitals is healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), with urinary tract infections (UTIs) being the most common. Approximately 75% of these infections are linked to indwelling urinary catheters, leading to catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2015).

Each year, an estimated 560,000 patients in the United States are affected by CAUTI. This condition contributes to longer hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Since CAUTI is largely preventable, it represents a major patient safety issue that demands evidence-based interventions and consistent application of preventive strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

Background and Scope of the Problem

Catheter-associated UTIs develop when microorganisms invade the urinary tract, either extraluminally (around the outer surface of the catheter) or intraluminally (through the catheter lumen) (Ferguson, 2018). Contributing factors include periurethral colonization, poor hand hygiene during insertion, and improper catheter maintenance.

Data reveal that about one in four hospitalized patients undergo catheterization during their stay, with the risk of infection increasing with the duration of catheter use. Although CAUTI may result in lower mortality compared to bloodstream infections or pneumonia, its frequency imposes a significant cumulative burden on healthcare resources.

Encouragingly, about 69% of CAUTI cases are preventable through adherence to evidence-based infection control practices (CDC, 2015). Consistent implementation of these measures could potentially prevent 380,000 cases and nearly 9,000 deaths each year in the U.S.

Goals of Improvement

Efforts to reduce CAUTI should be structured and grounded in best practices. The primary goals include:

1. Reducing CAUTI Incidence: Standardizing preventive measures to decrease infection rates.

2. Encouraging Appropriate Catheter Use: Limiting catheterization to necessary cases and ensuring timely removal.

3. Fostering a Culture of Safety: Promoting awareness, accountability, and compliance with infection prevention protocols.

4. Optimizing Resource Allocation: Using resources efficiently through interdepartmental collaboration and shared accountability.

These objectives require collective staff engagement, ongoing training, and leadership support to achieve and sustain meaningful improvements.

Quality Philosophy Application

NR 544 Week 3 Quality Improvement Model Application

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle provides a practical framework for systematically addressing CAUTI prevention. This iterative process facilitates structured improvement, assessment, and adjustment.

The PDSA approach encourages continuous refinement of practices and supports sustainable improvements (Demirel, 2019).

Regulatory Guidelines

National bodies, including the CDC, have developed guidelines to reduce CAUTI rates (CDC, 2015; Clarke et al., 2020). Key recommendations include:

• Appropriate Catheter Use: Restrict catheterization to necessary cases; remove within 24 hours post-surgery.

• Alternatives to Indwelling Catheters: Utilize intermittent or external devices when appropriate.

• Insertion and Maintenance Protocols: Employ sterile techniques, maintain proper hand hygiene, and replace catheters as indicated.

• Ongoing Education: Provide regular training on insertion, maintenance, and removal practices.

Quality Process Tool and Improvement Recommendations

Root Cause Analysis: The “5 Whys”

Root cause analysis identifies underlying factors contributing to CAUTI. The “5 Whys” method is particularly effective for exploring systemic issues.

(Perry & Mehltretter, 2018)

Gap Analysis Tool

A gap analysis compares current hospital practices to established best practices, identifying discrepancies and opportunities for targeted improvement.

(Pekkaya et al., 2019)

Conclusion

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are one of the most frequent yet preventable hospital-acquired infections in the United States. Their consequences extend beyond patient discomfort to include financial costs, increased morbidity, and prolonged hospitalization.

Adhering to CDC guidelines, fostering a safety-oriented culture, and ensuring continuous staff education can substantially reduce CAUTI rates. The integration of improvement frameworks such as the PDSA cycle, alongside tools like root cause analysis and gap analysis, provides a structured and sustainable approach to improvement.

NR 544 Week 3 Quality Improvement Model Application

Prioritizing CAUTI prevention not only enhances patient safety but also strengthens trust in healthcare institutions and improves the overall quality of care delivery.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI): Background information. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/cauti/background.html

Clarke, K., Hall, C. L., Wiley, Z., Tejedor, S. C., Kim, J. S., Reif, L., & Jacob, J. T. (2020). Catheter‐associated urinary tract infections in adults: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 15(9), 552–556. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3292

Demirel, A. (2019). Improvement of hand hygiene compliance in a private hospital using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) method. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 35(3), 721. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.3.297

Ferguson, A. (2018). Implementing a CAUTI prevention program in an acute care hospital setting. Urologic Nursing, 38(6), 289–295.

Pekkaya, M., Pulat İmamoğlu, Ö., & Koca, H. (2019). Evaluation of healthcare service quality via Servqual scale: An application on a hospital. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 12(4), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2017.1389474

Perry, W., & Mehltretter, N. (2018). Applying root cause analysis to compressed air: How to solve common compressed air system problems with the 5-whys. Energy Engineering, 115(4), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/01998595.2018.12016673