NUR 501 Module 4 Assignment 1 PowerPoint Presentation

• NUR 501 Module 4 Assignment 1 PowerPoint Presentation.

Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice

Slide 1: Greetings, I am Elcio, and today, I will introduce the theoretical framework for evidence-based advanced practice nursing. This examination intends to distinguish and examine a sensible theory or model for an evidence-based project that further makes clinical thought results. The theory’s importance and reasonable pertinence in persevering disorder the board will be examined by reviewing advanced practice nursing literature. The show will explain how the picked theoretical framework guides significant activities and works on quiet thought.

Slide 2: To coordinate Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), advanced practice orderlies need to include theoretical frameworks. Advanced Practice Escorts (APNs) utilize theoretical frameworks to investigate and address complex clinical advantages and difficulties (Zhang, 2024). The Industrious Idea Model (CCM) can assist APNs with designing, completing, and studying multi-clinical advantages therapies. This evaluation aims to find and examine a theory or model for an evidence-based project.

The examination will assess the literature on an advanced practice nursing topic, discuss the theory’s importance, and show how it can further empower clinical thought results. Picking a theoretical framework that supports interventions and shows principles for better, more sustainable results is major. A fitting theory can assist APNs with creating, executing, and focusing on interventions to address different clinical advantages issues (Zhang, 2024). This undertaking will set the theoretical framework by addressing pertinent advanced practice nursing issues.

Selected Area of Advanced Practice Nursing

Slide 3: Family Orderly Trained professionals (FNPs) direct ongoing circumstances in the fundamental idea of advanced practice nursing. Typical persevering disorders like diabetes and hypertension require continuing ideas. Clinical and patient instruction training causes families to sustain specialists sensible to treat these disorders (Powers et al., 2020). Nonetheless, consistent infection in the supervisors presents various difficulties that could influence patient ideas and results.

One of the family support specialists’ most challenging concerns is ensuring patients follow their proposed strategy (Powers et al., 2020). Non-adherence can be accomplished by infection ignorance, treatment intricacy, and financial constraints. For instance, because of financial constraints or inadequate clinical thought assets, patients can find it hard to respect dietary bearing or methodology frameworks.

• Improving Chronic Disease Management

Furthermore, wellbeing proficiency can enormously influence patients’ condition—the board. Family support professionals should work on understanding schooling and involvement to push consistency. Another ongoing sickness the board is concerned with is asset receptiveness, restricted master therapy, unequivocal tools, and support administrations, which are customary in principal thought (Neale et al., 2020). This constraint can influence ongoing disorder care unfavorably, resulting in poor patient results. FNPs should utilize assets gainfully and advocate for patients who intend to beat these cutoff points. Isolated care and poor idea coordination hinder unsurprising infection of the board.

The absence of communication and coordination among healthcare professionals leads to fragmented and ineffective patient care. To address these challenges, FNPs should promote interdisciplinary collaboration and effective care transitions. By working with other healthcare specialists, family nurse practitioners can ensure more comprehensive management of chronic conditions. These issues should be addressed to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs, as discussed in the NUR 501 Module 4 Assignment 1 PowerPoint Presentation (Neale et al., 2020).

Ongoing infection treatment diminishes traps and hospitalizations and affects individual satisfaction. Through their advanced cutoff points and breaking points, FNPs can use evidence-based therapies and marketing mastery for crucial reforms to further empower ongoing infection of the board (Habib & Alanazi, 2022). FNPs can also support ongoing patient wellbeing difficulties by prioritizing patient-focused therapy, asset use, and interdisciplinary teamwork.

Literature Review

Slide 4: A literature review is vital for evidence-based practice since it summarizes energy research on an issue. Late exploration distinguishes different central ideas consistent with the board issues. Bases show how financial examinations, wellbeing, and treatment intricacy could incite patient non-adherence. These checks should be squashed to work on quiet results and determine the infection of the pioneers. Xie et al. ( 2020) examined how financial factors influence ongoing infection therapy plan adherence.

The review indicated that lower-class patients experienced more difficulty following their treatment plans. These patients experienced inconvenience in getting clinical thought and keeping to their reaction plans because of financial difficulty, transportation issues, and insecure housing. Furthermore, wellbeing patients experienced inconvenience in comprehending their condition and the need to follow treatment programs, which increased non-adherence. Iei.e., et al. propose apportioned financial interventions. To improve adherence and patient results

NUR 501 Module 4 Assignment 1 PowerPoint Presentation

The Social Class for Infectious Presumption and Avoidance report is a serious area of fortitude for another. The CDC’s expected infection the supervisors spin around features the medicine intricacy as a significant obstacle to patient adherence. According to the source, clarifying medicine plans could be overwhelming and cause non-adherence in patients with a couple of determined disorders (Spots for Infectious Equilibrium and Congruity, 2022).

The CDC furthermore sees that parceled thinking, where patients look for therapy from a couple of clinicians without coordination, has an unsettling influence and inconsistent ideas. The CDC supports integrated care models that advance coordinated, patient-focused care to assist patients in following their treatment programs.

Introduction to Theory/Model

Slide 5: The Persevering Idea Model (CCM) by Wagner et al. gives an organized and complete framework for ongoing infection care (Grudniewicz et al., 2023). The CCM works on tolerant results in advanced practice nursing, and the central idea consistently torments the supervisors. The methodology spans wellbeing organization, self-administration help, improvement framework plan, choice support, clinical information frameworks, and neighborhood. The CCM gives approaches to managing ongoing disorders, including diabetes and hypertension, in key ideas (Grudniewicz et al., 2023).

The thought of the wellbeing organization advances patient-focused care. This requires reorganizing clinical advantage frameworks to zero in on security therapy, proactive administration, and solid disorder support. Self-administration help is another crucial CCM part for persistent illness patients. The FNP can utilize this part to show patients how to deal with their illnesses daily. Training, tools, and support from family nurture professionals can assist patients with making significant decisions and further developing their wellbeing.

• Enhancing Care Coordination Systems

The cwellbeingonveyance framework configuration guarantees convenient and coordinated care (Sebastian et al., 2021). This part centers on care coordination, simple exchanges between therapy areas, and medical care administration integration to convey total persistent sickness care. Medical services suppliers use evidence-based guidelines and tools for clinical direction (Sebastian et al., 2021). Family nurture specialists can obtain persistent ailment from the board clinical information, ideas, and methodology through electronic wellbeing choice support frameworks.

Clinical information frameworks investigate and convey patient information for quality improvement and evidence-based practice. Through electronic well-being records and other well-being information innovations, FNPs can get patient information, track well-being results, and survey ongoing disease medicines (Paydar et al., 2021). Constant infection patients need local area assets outside the clinic. Family nurture specialists can assist patients with nourishment, workouts, and emotional well-being and well-being ministrations through local area organizations, support gatherings, and social offices to improve their well-being.

Address Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice

Slide 6: In addressing the theoretical establishment to empower evidence-based practice, the Constant Consideration Model (CCM) can further develop essential considerations for ongoing sicknesses such as diabetes. The CCM stresses framework-level enhancements, patient-focused care, and interdisciplinary collaboration, aligning with evidence-based practice(Timpel et al., 2020). The CCM gives specialists, including family nurture experts, a theoretical underpinning for clinical navigation. The model’s proactive, coordinated care conveyance components empower evidence-based interventions to understand results and care quality.

Moreover, the CCM extensively addresses persistent ailments of the executives’ few issues. The idea helps FNPs exhaustively address patient necessities and improve patient support by focusing on self-administration help, conveyance framework plans, and clinical information systems(Timpel et al., 2020). The CCM likewise urges medical services suppliers to monitor patient results, review therapies, and settle on information-driven choices to advance continuous quality improvement. This iterative technique follows evidence-based practice, which combines treatment choices concerning the best evidence, patient inclinations, and supplier ability.

Relevance of Theory/Model

Slide 7: In essential consideration, family nurture experts managing ongoing circumstances are pertinent to the Persistent Consideration Model (CCM). Family nurture experts give complete, constant sickness care, making CCM principles imperative to their practice. First and foremost, FNPs’ immediate patient consideration obligations make them ideal CCM implementers. FNPs can avoid illness improvement and difficulties by using the model to oversee ongoing sicknesses through protection measures, continuous monitoring, and early intervention(Timpel et al., 2020).

The CCM’s emphasis on self-administration support supplements the FNP’s part in empowering individuals to deal with their welwellbeingNPs show patients their findings, therapy choices, and practices for caring for themselves, helping them make informed decisions and deal with their daily illnesses. Family nurture experts likewise prevail at interdisciplinary consideration coordination, another CCM part. FNPs work with subject matter experts, medical caretakers, drug specialists, and associated wellbeing to convey complete and coordinated persistent sickness care(Paydar et al., 2021).

Family nurture experts further develop care conveyance and patient results by encouraging teamwork and correspondence. The CCM’s integration of clinical information innovation and local area assets advances FNPs’ complete patient consideration. Family nurture professionals use EHRs and other well-being in well-being formation advances to access patient information, track well-being results, and make clinical choices(Paydar et al., 2021). Furthermore, FNPs work with local area organizations, support gatherings, and social offices to associate patients with social and natural assets.

Issue or Concern in Advanced Practice Nursing

Slide 8: In essential consideration, diabetes the executives is difficult for advanced practice medical caretakers. Diabetes is a constant metabolic disorder that raises glucose and is on the ascent worldwide. Poor diabetes control can cause cardiovascular illness, kidney disappointment, neuropathy, and vision misfortune (Jyotsna et al., 2023). These outcomes increase hospitalizations, crisis division visits, and long-haul care needs, lowering patients’ personal satisfaction and burdening medical services frameworks. The effect of diabetes on medical care goes past the specific patient and influences a few individuals. Diabetes commonness increases medical care framework costs.

The American Diabetes Affiliation gauges that diabetes costs billions of dollars yearly in the US (American Diabetes Affiliation, 2023). Clinical costs, lost efficiency, incapacity, and early mortality are included. Effective diabetes therapy works on quiet results and brings down medical care consumption. A complete methodology is expected to control diabetes. This includes encouraging drug adherence, sustenance and exercise to maintain glucose, and routine blood glucose monitoring to distinguish and forestall issues (American Diabetes Affiliation, 2023). Medical services access, patient adherence, financial inequalities, and social perspectives could make these points challenging.

Application of the Theory/Model

Slide 9: At this point, the Constant Consideration Model (CCM) creates a productive premise for evidence based essential consideration diabetes the board. Advanced practice nurses, and specifically family nurse practitioners, can apply CCM to provide diabetes care treatments(Shambray, 2021). To begin with, the CCM component of self-management support boosts the FNPs’ instructional role in the management of diabetes to enable the patients to tackle their condition.

An FNP can demonstrate diabetic self care to patients, which includes medication, dietary and physical activity, as well as self blood glucose testing. Training patients can enhance disease treating confidence and ensure better wellbeingsults (Shambray, 2021).

• Interdisciplinary Diabetes Care Coordination

Furthermore, the design of the CCM delivery system enhances interprofessional collaboration and care coordination. Family Nurse Practitioners can implement this strategy through the formation of care teams with other specialists like nutritionists, endocrinologists, pharmacists, and social workers. Diabetes patients can receive comprehensive medical, nutritional, psychological, and economic care from these teams. Family Nurse Practitioners can improve and ensure patient satisfaction and wellwellbeingsults through timing and organization of care delivery and team communication.

Family nurture specialists can further develop diabetes therapy using CCM clinical information frameworks (Weikert, 2021). Care suppliers can follow patient advancement, monitor wellbeing, and impart using EHRs and other wellbeing. Family nurture specialists can obtain evidence-based diabetes guidelines, systems, and best practices through EHR clinical choice support. EHR information interchange and interoperability streamline medical care supplier and area collaboration.

Unique Insights and Perspectives

Slide 10: Applying the constant consideration model in diabetes: The board gives unique insights into improving consideration conveyance and patient results. The CCM centers around framework-level enhancements rather than patient behavior. It perceives the convoluted relationship between medical services infrastructure, care cycles, and supplier-patient interactions that influence wellbeing and results by stressing the care conveyance framework organization (Wharton et al., 2020). The CCM helps medical services clinicians, particularly family nurture professionals, understand foundational deterrents and facilitators to diabetes therapy.

• Improving Diabetes Care Coordination

While patient non-adherence and factors connected with the way of life can prompt poor wellbeing results, the CCM urges professionals to consider care discontinuity, correspondence holes, and asset accessibility. This complete viewpoint urges family nurture professionals to advocate for framework-level changes that address these underlying determinants of wellbeing, which will result in more successful and lasting interventions (Wharton et al., 2020).

The CCM enhances integrative interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork which is another specialization. Through appreciating the complexity of different fields of medicine, the CCM facilitates communication and cooperation across disciplines. This is essential as it helps the patient get holistic treatment. As important members of the health care team, FNPs take active roles in diabetes management through collaboration and coordination of care processes.

Conclusion

Slide 11: The Ongoing Consideration Model (CCM) supports evidence-based diabetes. The CCM follows evidence-based practice by emphasizing framework-level upgrades, patient-focused care, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The model’s self-administration help, conveyance framework plan, and clinical information frameworks assist families with Nursing Experts (FNPs) work on quiet results.

The CCM develops fully integrated and coordinated approaches to care with the intention of achieving optimal patient outcomes while at the same time, reducing health costs for chronic care. Sustainable health care in terms of advanced nursing practice is developed taking into account the appropriate theoretical models that support evidence based practices. This framework is presented in the NUR 501 Module 4 Assignment 1 PowerPoint Presentation.

References

American Diabetes Association. (2023, November 1). New American diabetes association report finds annual costs of diabetes to be $412.9 billion | American Diabetes Association  https://diabetes.org/newsroom/press-releases/new-american-diabetes-association-report-finds-annual-costs-diabetes-be

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain — United States, 2022. MMWR. Recommendations and Reports, 71(3), 1–95. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1

Grudniewicz, A., Carolyn Steele Gray, Boeckxstaens, P., Jan De Maeseneer, & Mold, J. W. (2023). Operationalizing the chronic care model with goal-oriented care. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 16(6), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-023-00645-8

Habib, H., & Alanazi, N. (2022). Exploring the role of nurse practitioners in improving chronic disease management. https://sjr-publishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Exploring-the-Role-of-Nurse-Practitioners-in-Improving-Chronic-Disease-Management.pdf

Jyotsna, F., Ahmed, A., Kumar, K., Kaur, P., Chaudhary, M. H., Kumar, S., Khan, E., Khanam, B., Shah, S. U., Varrassi, G., Khatri, M., Kumar, S., & Kakadiya, K. A. (2023). Exploring the complex connection between diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Analyzing approaches to mitigate cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Cureus, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43882

Neale, E. P., Middleton, J., & Lambert, K. (2020). Barriers and enablers to detecting and managing chronic kidney disease in primary healthcare: A systematic review. BioMed Central (BMC) Nephrology, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01731-x

Paydar, S., Emami, H., Asadi, F., Moghaddasi, H., & Hosseini, A. (2021). Functions and Outcomes of personal health records for patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 18(Spring), 1l. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314040/

Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J. K., Cypress, M., Funnell, M. M., Harms, D., Hess-Fischl, A., Hooks, B., Isaacs, D., Mandel, E. D., Maryniuk, M. D., Norton, A., Rinker, J., Siminerio, L. M., & Uelmen, S. (2020). Diabetes self-management education and support in adults with type 2 diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Diabetes Association, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacists Association. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 60(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.018

Sebastian, A., Carroll, J. C., Oldfield, L. E., Mighton, C., Shickh, S., Uleryk, E., & Bombard, Y. (2021). Effect of genetics clinical decision support tools on healthcare providers’ decision making: A mixed-methods systematic review. Genetics in Medicine, 4(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01045-1

Shambray, A. (2021). Decreasing the impact of diabetes in the adult and older adults’ rural health population by utilizing phone calls as part of the chronic care management program. Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects, 5(6). https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/etds_nursing/48/

Timpel, P., Lang, C., Wens, J., Contel, J. C., & Schwarz, P. E. H. (2020). The managed care model – developing an evidence-based and expert-driven chronic care management model for patients with diabetes. International Journal of Integrated Care, 20(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4646

Weikert, R. L. (2021, December 16). The use of mobile technology and diabetes education to assist diabetic mellitus patients with hypertension and ha1c levels – ProQuest. Www.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/9e9e20a62530d8416e4251ca3d68cf2c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Wharton, M. K., Shi, L., Eragoda, S., Monnette, A. M., Nauman, E., Price-Haywood, E. G., Hu, G., & Bazzano, A. N. (2020). Qualitative Analysis of health systems utilizing non-face-to-face chronic care management for Medicare-insured patients with diabetes. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 43(4), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000342

Xie, Z., Liu, K., Or, C., Chen, J., Yan, M., & Wang, H. (2020). An examination of the socio-demographic correlates of patient adherence to self-management behaviors and the mediating roles of health attitudes and self-efficacy among patients with coexisting type 2 diabetes and hypertension. BioMed Central (BMC) Public Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09274-4

Zhang, Y. (2024). What is nursing in advanced nursing practice? Applying theories and models to advanced nursing practice—A discursive review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16228