NURS FPX 6410 Assessment 3 Exploration of Regulations and Implications for Practice

• NURS FPX 6410 Assessment 3

In modern healthcare, informatics is pivotal in integrating information and communication technologies into nursing practice. This approach not only improves the delivery of care but also enhances patient outcomes. The Electronic Health Record System (EHR) is a standout example of this progress. EHR systems reduce documentation burdens and prevent adverse events, allowing nurses to focus on patient care while minimizing emotional exhaustion. This study examines the potential hazards of EHR systems and explores safety measures for effective implementation.

Safety Issues Involved

Medication errors remain a persistent challenge in healthcare, contributing to approximately 10,000 deaths annually in the United States (Manias et al., 2019). These errors can stem from administering the wrong medication, incorrect dosages, or misidentifying patients. Adverse reactions due to mismatched diagnoses are also a significant concern. Causes include individual mistakes, communication breakdowns, and misinterpretation of medication names (Giuliano, 2018). Implementing proper precautions can significantly reduce the risks associated with medication errors.

Informatics Models and Safe Practices

Informatics models, such as the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) initiative, have been developed to address safety concerns. This model integrates eHealth into education, providing tools and resources to foster collaborative approaches in healthcare (Chen et al., 2022). TIGER encourages safe practices to minimize adverse drug events, supporting nursing staff in delivering optimal care.

EHR systems exemplify safe healthcare technology by streamlining processes. By eliminating handwritten prescriptions, EHR systems reduce ambiguity and errors. Clinical alerts notify nurses of potential mistakes, improving decision-making and identifying practice gaps. Nurse informatics professionals ensure the effective use of data, furthering patient safety and care quality (Fragidis et al., 2018). This focus aligns with the objectives of NURS FPX 6410 Assessment 3, emphasizing the exploration of regulations and their implications for practice.

Intended Goals

The primary aim of EHR implementation is to reduce medication errors and their associated fatalities. EHR systems empower nurses to adopt best practices that boost patient confidence and satisfaction. Enhanced access to patient data allows nurses to prevent incorrect diagnoses and adverse drug events. This innovation ensures that nurses can make informed decisions to achieve better patient outcomes (Joukes et al., 2019).

Outcomes of EHR Implementation

Healthcare organizations increasingly adopt EHR systems to improve care quality. Studies reveal that clinical alerts positively influence patient safety and outcomes. EHR systems simplify workflows by enabling nurses to access detailed patient information before consultations, reducing the risk of errors (Robinson et al., 2018). Although challenges like increased workload and process inefficiencies persist, the benefits—including better communication, enhanced quality of care, and increased patient and nurse satisfaction—outweigh the drawbacks (Alzu’bi et al., 2021).

Applying Standards of Practice

The American Nurses Association (ANA) provides safe and ethical nursing practice standards. These standards include steps for data collection, analysis, planning, implementation, and evaluation (Linton et al., 2020). The ANA’s Code of Ethics emphasizes autonomy, beneficence, justice, and non-maleficence, ensuring equitable and harm-free care. These principles allow nurses to foster a secure and ethical practice environment.

Regulatory Considerations

Compliance with regulations is critical for adopting EHR systems. Regulatory guidelines emphasize training, secure networks, and data privacy. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) mandates safeguarding sensitive information, restricting access to authorized users only (Rosenbloom et al., 2019). Training healthcare personnel ensures smooth transitions to EHR systems while maintaining patient confidentiality.

Ethical and Legal Frameworks

Ethical concerns surrounding EHR systems include confidentiality and data protection. Nurses must receive adequate training to prevent errors and manage sensitive information responsibly. Legal considerations involve maintaining data integrity and adhering to privacy regulations. Ethical and legal compliance ensures the system’s credibility and protects patient rights (Layman, 2020).

Role of Stakeholders

Stakeholders play an essential role in EHR implementation. Nurses, physicians, IT auditors, and administrative staff must collaborate to ensure the system’s success. Each group contributes to different aspects, such as data security, system functionality, and financial decisions. Nurse informatics professionals drive innovation, addressing gaps in healthcare to improve outcomes, particularly in areas like medication error reduction (Pollock et al., 2018).

Training and Collaboration

Effective communication with stakeholders ensures smooth EHR adoption. Physicians and nurses—being closest to patients—offer valuable insights for system design. Administrative boards oversee financial and operational decisions, while IT teams ensure compliance with security standards. Collaborative efforts support the goals of NURS FPX 6410 Assessment 3 by fostering safe and efficient healthcare practices.

Conclusion

The integration of informatics, exemplified by EHR systems, has revolutionized healthcare. These systems address medication errors and improve patient outcomes through safe, efficient practices. Adhering to ethical and legal standards ensures data protection and system reliability. Healthcare organizations can create innovative solutions to enhance care quality by involving stakeholders and leveraging informatics models. The insights gained from NURS FPX 6410 Assessment 3 underscore the importance of regulations and their implications for nursing practice.

Read more NURS FPX 6410 Assessment 2 Executive Summary to Administration about for complete information about this class.

References

Alzu’bi, A. A., Watzlaf, V. J. M., & Sheridan, P. (2021). Electronic health record (EHR) abstraction. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 18(1), 1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34035788/

Chen, Y., Cai, Z., Lin, B., Yan, L., Zheng, W., Kuo, M. C., Hübner, U., & Chang, P. (2022). Developing a professional-practice-model-based nursing organizational informatics competency model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 166, 104840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104840

Chou, R., Baker, W. L., Bañez, L. L., Iyer, S., Myers, E. R., Newberry, S., Pincock, L., Robinson, K. A., Sardenga, L., Sathe, N., Springs, S., & Wilt, T. J. (2018). Agency for healthcare research and quality evidence-based practice center methods provide guidance on prioritization and selection of harms in systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 98, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.007

Fragidis, L. L., & Chatzoglou, P. D. (2018). Implementation of a nationwide electronic health record (EHR). International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 31(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2016-0136

Giuliano K. K. (2018). Intravenous smart pumps: Usability issues, intravenous medication administration error, and patient safety. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 30(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2018.02.004

Joukes, E., de Keizer, N. F., de Bruijne, M. C., Abu-Hanna, A., & Cornet, R. (2019). Impact of electronic versus paper-based recording before EHR implementation on health care professionals’ perceptions of EHR use, data quality, and data reuse. Applied Clinical Informatics, 10(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1681054

Layman E. J. (2020). Ethical issues and the electronic health record. The Health Care Manager, 39(4), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000302

Linton, M., & Koonmen, J. (2020). Self-care as an ethical obligation for nurses. Nursing Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020940371

Manias, E., Cranswick, N., Newall, F., Rosenfeld, E., Weiner, C., Williams, A., Wong, I. C., Borrott, N., Lai, J., & Kinney, S. (2019). Medication error trends and effects of person-related, environment-related and communication-related factors on medication errors in a pediatric hospital. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 55(3), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14193

Pollock, A., Campbell, P., Struthers, C., Synnot, A., Nunn, J., Hill, S., Goodare, H., Morris, J., Watts, C., & Morley, R. (2018). Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: A scoping review. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0852-0

Robinson, K. E., & Kersey, J. A. (2018). Novel electronic health record (EHR) education intervention in large healthcare organizations improves quality, efficiency, time, and impact on burnout. Medicine, 97(38), e12319. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012319

Rosenbloom, S. T., Smith, J. R. L., Bowen, R., Burns, J., Riplinger, L., & Payne, T. H. (2019). Updating HIPAA for the electronic medical record era. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 26(10), 1115–1119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz090

Strudwick, G., Nagle, L., Kassam, I., Pahwa, M., & Sequeira, L. (2019). Informatics competencies for nurse leaders: A scoping review. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(6), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000760