NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search

• NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search.

Literature Search

The course of action that will be used to lead the literature search for this experience splendidly lights the blueprint of individualized CBT models and convinces narcotic-dependent patients to join the going with. A literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library should be worked with, as detailed in the NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search.

• Literature Search for Interventions

The going with conveying related to the PICOT question will be used: narcotic inspiration, mental and social treatment, intense talking, client-centred treatment, and readmissions. To search for the articles, we can use Boolean Search pioneers like What’s More and Channel by year and by the sort of articles, whether they are peer-researched (Hah et al., 2020). The objective of the literature search is to find the most basic and sensibly careful assessments that investigate the reasonableness of the suggested interventions in reducing return rates among the objective people.

Literature Search Strategy

A few search procedures will be used to get every one of the typical books for the undertaking on individualized CBT social events and engaged visiting with narcotic subordinate patients. The going with edifying records will be used for the search since they are appropriate. A piece of the search terms could integrate Opioid obsession, Mental lead treatment, Moving social event, Individualized treatment, Readmission rates and other related terms. Cross-section terms, Narcotic Related Issues, Mental Social Treatment, and Enticing Talking will be used in the search to limit the articles to only those relevant to the survey.

Boolean heads like And possibly and channels like the issue date and companion researched will be used to restrict the search. MacLean et al. (2024) have correspondingly articulated that notwithstanding the referred-to, the reference approaches of the included evaluations and other cautious studies will be searched to see other related literature. This will guarantee that exceptionally constant information is combined; accordingly, the sources used will be from the last five years. The past sources that will be enormous, convincing, and associated with the assignment will be worked with.

The chief search should convey different likely sources. The evaluations that will be consolidated will incorporate adult medication addicts, will use cures, for instance, individualized CBT and MI, and will ponder results, for instance, readmission rates. Those that are not streamed in English, those that combine children, or those of poor unsurprising quality will be pardoned.

Notwithstanding, companion kept an eye out for articles; the search strategy will blend purposeful reviews, government reports, and, if massive, structures/suggestion reports proposed as “dull literature” (Suspend et al., 2021). Around 20 to 30 sources pertinent to the audit and of good quality will be held for the literature frame to apply the circuit and evasion rules. They will be taken apart and facilitated to get information that will be huge in orchestrating, doing, and reviewing the endeavour. This will ensure the strategy is fanned out in the most recent and precise information.

Analysis of Evidence

The data was all bankrupt, and 20 friend surveyed papers were utilized in this audit. These articles were picked since they join forces with the PICOT question and have sound key quality. Different outline plans were used in the evaluations, including randomized controlled fundamentals, decided reviews, and reasonable appraisals.

The research focused on analyzing key results and trends while assessing the quality and strength of the evidence. Considering these 20 articles, current data on the effectiveness of CBT and MI in managing substance use disorders and chronic pain can be presented. Furthermore, based on the findings of the current review, specific conclusions can be drawn, and recommendations for practice and further research can be formulated, as outlined in the NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search.

Organization of Literature

• Effectiveness of CBT and MI

From the literature that has been opposed concerning the PICOT question, the going with not for all time set up. Notwithstanding, Suspend and Extras (2021), Gazzola and Associates (2022), and Advanced and Relates (2021) have uncovered that CBT and MI are strong intercessions for people with narcotic obsession or reliable agony. Furthermore, the reasonableness of CBT and MI cures has been tracked down in coordinating torture, precious flourishing, and medication use (Amin et al., 2023; Zamboni et al., 2021).

Moreover, the survey shows that thought should be paid to the perspective of these intercessions and the connected costs in different clinical benefits settings, including focal thought, crisis office, and master thought (MacLean et al., 2024; Olmstead et al., 2020; Zerden et al., 2020). Like this, the cost piece of CBT should not be pardoned while hoping to apply CBT in the organization.

Today, stress and pain are prominent areas of focus. CBT and MI appear to be significant in treating individuals with OUD who have co-occurring mental health issues such as anxiety and depression (Buckner et al., 2023; McHugh et al., 2024). However, specific gaps remain in understanding the long-term effects of treatments and disparities in treatment outcomes across different groups or conditions, as highlighted in the NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search.

Read more about our sample NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search for complete information about this class.

Conclusion

The 20 articles picked for their importance and sound research have uncovered tremendous models. The research moreover presents how it is crucial to consider how these medications should be worked with and whether they are reasonable while recalling them for various centre settings.

References

Amin, M., Reza Davasaz Irani, Fattahi, P., & Sirus Pakseresht. (2023). Effects of brief cognitive behavioural therapy on mental health in substance-related disorder: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05413-4

Bertholet, N., Meli, S., Palfai, T. P., Cheng, D. M., Alford, D. P., Bernstein, J., Samet, J. H., Lloyd-Travaglini, C., & Saitz, R. (2020). Screening and brief intervention for lower-risk drug use in primary care: A pilot randomized trial: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 213, 108001.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108001

Borsari, B., Li, Y., Tighe, J., Manuel, J. K., Gökbayrak, N. S., Delucchi, K., Morasco, B. J., Abadjian, L., Cohen, B. E., Baxley, C., & Seal, K. H. (2021). A pilot trial of collaborative care with motivational interviewing to reduce opioid risk and improve chronic pain management. Addiction, 116(9).

https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15401

Buckner, J. D., Scherzer, C. R., Crapanzano, K. A., & Morris, P. E. (2023). Group cognitive behavioural therapy for substance use disorders among psychiatric inpatients in a medically underserved area: An intervention for opioid misuse. Public Health Reports, 138(1_suppl), 90S95S.

https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549231170219

Buckner, J. D., Walukevich-Dienst, K., Crapanzano, K. A., Tucker, R. P., & Tynes, L. L. (2021). Brief motivational interviewing–based interventions for opioid misuse in hospital settings. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 7(2), 114–129.

https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000280

Darnall, B. D., Mackey, S. C., Lorig, K., Kao, M.-C., Mardian, A., Stieg, R., Porter, J., DeBruyne, K., Murphy, J., Perez, L., Okvat, H., Tian, L., Flood, P., McGovern, M., Colloca, L., King, H., Van Dorsten, B., Pun, T., & Cheung, M. (2019). Comparative effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic pain and chronic pain self-management within the context of voluntary patient-centred prescription opioid tapering: The EMPOWER study protocol. Pain Medicine, 21(8).

https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz285

DeBar, L., Mayhew, M., Benes, L., Bonifay, A., Deyo, R. A., Elder, C. R., Keefe, F. J., Leo, M. C., McMullen, C., Owen-Smith, A., Smith, D. H., Trinacty, C. M., & Vollmer, W. M. (2021). A primary care-based cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for long-term opioid users with chronic pain. Annals of Internal Medicine, 175(1).

https://doi.org/10.7326/m21-1436

Gazzola, M. G., Beitel, M., Cutter, C. J., & Barry, D. T. (2022). Cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic pain and opioid use disorder. Elsevier EBooks, 235–246.

https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-820237-1.00022-3

Hah, J. M., Trafton, J. A., Narasimhan, B., Krishnamurthy, P., Hilmoe, H., Sharifzadeh, Y., Huddleston, J. I., Amanatullah, D., Maloney, W. J., Goodman, S., Carroll, I., & Mackey, S. C. (2020). Efficacy of motivational interviewing and guided opioid tapering support for patients undergoing surgery (MI-Opioid Taper): A prospective, assessor-blind, randomized controlled pilot trial. EClinicalMedicine, 28.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100596

Lent, M. R., Callahan, H. R., Womer, P., Mullen, P. M., Shook, C. B., DiTomasso, R. A., Felgoise, S. H., & Festinger, D. S. (2021). A mental health professional survey of cognitive-behavioural therapy for the treatment of opioid use disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(7), 1607–1613.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23170

MacLean, R. R., Ankawi, B., Driscoll, M. A., Gordon, M. A., Frankforter, T. L., Nich, C., Szollosy, S. K., Loya, J. M., Brito, L., Ribeiro, M. I. P., Edmond, S. N., Becker, W. C., Martino, S., Sofuoglu, M., & Heapy, A. A. (2024). Efficacy of integrating the management of pain and addiction via collaborative treatment (impact) in individuals with chronic pain and opioid use disorder: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial of a digital cognitive behavioural treatment. JMIR Research Protocols, 13(1), e54342.

https://doi.org/10.2196/54342

McHugh, R. K., Fitzmaurice, G. M., Votaw, V. R., Geyer, R. B., Ragnini, K., Greenfield, S. F., & Weiss, R. D. (2024). Cognitivbehaviouralal therapy for anxiety and opioid use disorder: Development and pilot test—Journalnal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 160, 209296.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209296