NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5 Reflection

• NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5 Reflection.

Reflection

As part of this reflection in NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5, it is conceivable to examine the main accomplishments achieved during the work at the separate stages of this course, with the main emphasis on enhancing the literature synthesis and collaboration at the project location. In each of these domains, I will evaluate to what degree my activities served the goals, what worked and what did not, and what should be conceivable later on (Smith, 2020).

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

• Enhancing Skills Through Reflection

This reflection will also enhance the critical reasoning and critical reasoning domain, improving my advancement towards the DX doctoral project as I progress towards the conveyance of NHS-FPX9903. In this reflection, I will discuss my abilities by directing research and proof-based practices to augment my mediation. I will also offer detailed documentation of the development and learning of my abilities through the project implementation phase.

Are you Looking for guidance for NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5? Our specialists are here to assist you. Contact us for help today.

Opportunities Related to the Development of a Literature Synthesis

• Literature Synthesis Process Insights

Process

The process of accomplishing the literature synthesis for this paper was encased inside a framework of a systematic search for the relevant literature and critical evaluation of the sources that were seen. Starting with questions related to the themes of my doctoral project will assist with making my literature search encompassing and relevant to the project’s goals.

For the nonstop work, I gathered articles from peer-evaluated journals utilizing the PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases; these articles featured articles scattered after 2019 to give the greatest material available to help my work ( Johnson et al., 2021).

Outcomes

Literature synthesis gave areas of solidarity so that an accumulation of information might see wellsprings of proof of the suggested frameworks and the areas lacking current information on my project topic.

The constant outline was a fundamental basis for the practice choices regarding the project mediations and the practice change. The synthesis also helped to characterize what required additional research, which assisted my project.

Success

Another strength of the literature synthesis process was the chance to establish a piece of the programs and strategies that could immediately be used at my project site based on the proof.

NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5 Reflection

For instance, implementing patient care conveyance models still needs to be settled to dissipate patients’ quality of care and satisfaction (Taylor & Thompson, 2020). It also helped convey a theoretical foundation for the project, by which research revelations and data could appropriately back all the mediations.

Improvement Opportunities

Several challenges were noted to have been practiced in the literature synthesis in this manner, decreasing the viability of the synthesis process. One of the worries was identifying the latest and exceptional articles regarding the topic area as healthcare continually creates, and many results can be considered outdated.

With this impact, while preparing the accompanying update of my literature audit, I will zero in on including later literature, assuming any available proof-based research openings may exist (Factory Operator and Johnson, 2022). Furthermore, I will expand my ability to examine the quality and relevance of sound examinations.

Collaboratiutilizedther Relevant Work at the Project Site

• Collaborative Project Management Outcomes

Process

Online cooperation at the project site was initiated with the identification of communication media and the arrangement of the assignment of tasks, obligations, and authorities. Fortnightly staff gatherings, including the medical practitioners, administrative representatives, and other key stakeholders, had the decision to guarantee that everybody was in total agreement regarding the project’s developments.

I utilized physical meetings and electronic correspondence to guarantee that I could work with the other understudies. Also, an electronic collaborative project management tool has been established, where tasks are tackled, and their deadlines and obligations are illustrated (Smith & Jones, 2021).

Outcomes

Various advantages were noted because of collaborative endeavors’ performance. Targeted project goals were repeatedly met, and the sophistication of the project’s outcomes was enhanced by the obligation of the project team’s individuals’ established assorted abilities.

For example, while cultivating another patient care method, clinical practitioners’ and administrators’ information broadened and worked on the result to maximize the operation. The project was regularly checked, and proposed changes were incorporated regarding the team’s reaction, making the reliable circumstance more dynamic and adaptable (Johnson et al., 2022).

Success

Remarkably, the engaging collaboration satisfied a multidisciplinary patient care framework that was met with a positive reaction from representatives and patients. Parallel to enhancing external quality, this approach also guaranteed that patients would gain further results and propagate the ideas of teamwork and regard among healthcare suppliers.

Organization of care: Improvement and decreased patient waiting times were some of the issues successfully addressed through collaboration, emphasizing the importance of best practice arrangements (Taylor & Thompson, 2020).

Improvement Opportunities

There were also a couple of opportunities for improvement. There were typically two major issues in the process—the first was coordinating the working timetable, and the ensuing one was the availability of the understudies, who were the individuals from the teams. Because of this, I want to accommodate gatherings to certain hours and incorporate using tools and username communication.

• Resolving Managerial Disagreements Effectively

The research found cases where managers’ disagreements upset the processes of heading. To enhance this, I will align endeavors and concentrate on elaborating a particular arrangement of improvement needs concerning battle-settling abilities and creating a point of view where various attitudes are regarded not as significances but as potential outcomes (Plant Operator & Johnson, 2022).

Conclusion

This paper, as part of NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5 Reflection, has been another great opportunity to consider the processes that drove the development of the literature synthesis and the accomplishments and challenges experienced at the project site. The literature synthesis paved the way for an adequate synthesis of the best evidence in the project and practice to make relevant decisions and emphasize the importance of ongoing developmental research. Integration with various professions at the project site fostered more creative and successful processes for patient treatment.

Nonetheless, this has a flip side, as it revealed the issues of further creating means and ways of communication and peace advancement. This awareness of personal biases, convictions, and sentiments has been exceptionally valuable in developing my strategies for analyzing literature aanalyzingation.

This means that by being available to others’ ideas and ideas of others and by being a perpetual learner, I will want to work on my abilities as I work on my doctoral project and my future professional endeavors. Later, I will incorporate these ideas to ensure that my endeavors in the circle are knowledgeable, unbiased, and adequate for constantly changing the healthcare circle.

References

Curtis, E., Jones, R., Tipene-Leach, D., Walker, C., Loring, B., Paine, S.-J., & Reid, P. (2019). Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: A literature review and recommended definition. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18(1), 1–17.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1082-3

Green, H., Fernandez, R., & MacPhail, C. (2021). The social determinants of health and health outcomes among adults during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. Public Health Nursing, 38(6).

https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12959

Knapp, M., & Wong, G. (2020). Economics and mental health: The current scenario. World Psychiatry, 19(1), 3–14.

https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20692

Mukhalalati, B. A., & Taylor, A. (2019). Adult learning theories in context: A quick guide for healthcare professional educators. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 6(1), 1–10.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840332

Sukhera, J., Gonzalez, C., & Watling, C. J. (2020). Implicit bias in health professions. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 1.

https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003173

Zhang, L., Li, H., & Chen, K. (2020). Effective risk communication for public health emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-ncov) outbreak in Wuhan china. Healthcare, 8(1), 64.

https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010064