NURS FPX6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Course Evaluation Template

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Capella University

NURS FPX6111 Assessment 3

Date Sep, 2024

Course Evaluation Template on Bullying Education in Nursing

Evaluation of training courses is used in all nursing education courses. To determine the cost of the scenario being assessed, the evaluation tracks clues, which may be standardized and set. Thus, an evaluation of the route is a template that instructors share following the route to learn about what the scholars enjoyed and disliked regarding the class as well as whether or not the lesson objectives are being achieved (Sidhu & Park, 2018). NURS FPX6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template grants college students exposure to the comments of their educator and helps them decide which skills discovered are applied as the upcoming to further improve the well actually worth of studying (Tawafak and one of a Kind, 2019).
The analysis framework was constructed to examine the results of this tool. This assessment is to determine the extent of proficiency university college students have in computer usage and information analysis. It’s a trusted and reliable Likert scale that is honest and consistent. That is the scale used in evaluating evaluations. 5 scales of agree (strongly in agreement, strongly observe, neutral, agree, and strongly disagree) are accommodated to the priority depending on the range (Boateng, further to co. in the year 2018).
Standards used in order to evaluate is a means to understand the diploma to which desires are being fulfilled. As mentioned before, those standards are divided into grades, starting from complete confrontation and normal disagreement. The requirements are probably used to determine if the student is either at a mutual settlement or discord regarding the results in their direction as a result of their studies. Based on their solutions to the surveys that we’ve collected and analyzed, we can determine what number of university students feel they’ve found. What’s a really great way to use generation for healthcare? In comparison, people who are not aware apprehend what the very last effects are. That is a measurable method of comparing the efficacy of academic software.
as for the targets. since the utility advances while students move by by means of the curriculum, the template can be applied to degree their diploma of pleasure, in addition to the general effectiveness of the program (Padilha and different. for the year 2019). ).

Template for Evaluating Learning Outcomes

The Likert Scale can be used to determine the effectiveness of training by the trainer, in addition to studying methods. Student answers on the questionnaires can be grouped to be compared and evaluated in order to aid in comparing the effectiveness of getting to know. The pupil’s answers can be categorized into three types: agreement, word struggle, and recognition. The ratio of inexperienced individuals who are certain regarding their impression and the ratio of individuals who aren’t diagnosed by the answers they provide. This would indicate the degree to which college students are prepared to apply scholarly methods for dealing with Bullying in a multi-disciplinary environment. The design can be utilized to ascertain the performance of coaching through the measurement of rookies’ exam scores. This Likert scale is a great tool to validate the results of the test (Brown, Tyo and McCurry 2019). The result of gaining knowledge of a student’s level of competence in attaining such dreams may even be measured today with the bureaucracy.

Assessment Strategies

NURS FPX6111 Assessment 3 strategies will include questions that are open-ended, just like closed-ended, so that students are given a wider scope to further enable them to better verify the content material covered in the class. The reason for class evaluation is to establish how a good deal of scholars recognize what they must be studying from the start until they give up on sophistication, according to the results of the elegance and the consequences of the path and the techniques hired to train (Rajak and Different, 2019, 2019). ).

Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Affective Domains

Table 1: Outcomes of Learning in the Areas of Thought, Action, and Emotion

Assumptions

Based on the assumption of this assumption, it is possible to examine the evaluation

1. The effort of an instructor isn’t directly related to the level of students’ abilities.
2. Objectives of the program, or goals for the students, need to be identical to ensure students provide honest and precise tests.
3. The link is to bullying education for nurses and various other solutions for healthcare.
4. Students’ ability to learn through exercises on Bullying or various other issues increases the effectiveness of their treatment (Divecha as well as Brackett, 2019).
5. The ability of students to cope with confronting Bullying in the workplace by challenging their mental and psychomotor capability as well as their emotional domains (Kukulska-Hulme and other authors, 2022).

Evaluation Method

There are a lot of methods for testing out education applications. Those who are selected must be tested with caution. It’s also possible to make the choice complete through a proper assessment by testing the effectiveness of this system and by an evaluation that is summative in nature. Furthermore, the blended method approach is an excellent way of gathering insightful records. questions regarding the problem of Bullying in nursing views will raise consciousness the scholars whether or no longer they’re comfortable with their knowledge. Through evaluating three types of categories (schooling goals, aspirations, and applicability) deeper to making a look at the evaluation tool utilized to assess and comments, university students can give feedback to their instructor (Hogan and colleagues. in the year 2018).

Evaluation of Program and Learning Outcomes

Table 2: The Course Met the Stated Program Outcomes

We assign this Likert scale to the degree of consistency between our aforementioned wants to guide our path’s curriculum, anticipated outcomes, and the quantified overall performance. Using this approach, we can determine the masses of the forecasted outcomes as per the actual changes in college students’ attitudes and abilities. Outcome measures have been analyzed to determine the areas that need more interest in order to boost the retention rate of inexperienced individuals’ data (Serafin and colleagues, 2010; 2020).

NURS FPX6111 Assessment 3 Format Evaluation Criteria

Assessments are based on Likert Scale questions. There are five different scales students may make use of (strongly in agreement or disagree). Students may pick from these scales for precise and precise responses with the lowest risk of mistakes (De and Co. 2021).

Validity and Reliability

There’s a lot of trust and validity in both closed-ended and open-ended tests utilized in the test. Scores from the Likert Scale are considered solid due to its high accuracy of 94. Due to its accuracy and its reliability, the scale was chosen for use as the foundation for this research (Jebb and other. 2021 ).

Benefits of Using a Likert Scale

1. The purchase is easy to do and gives you measurable choices to solve the problem.
2. Respondents will be able to reply because the code used for response is straightforward.
3. It is a simple, powerful, efficient, and cost-effective method for testing and gathering data (Jebb and Co. 2021).

The Likert Scale Drawbacks

1. It is difficult to accept the responses that are within the neither agree nor in agreement with category.
2. Respondents generally take every claim as true because of an implicit prejudice.
3. In certain instances, individuals create false answers to questions or give fake information. The possibility is that the survey or survey was not filled out.

Executive Summary

The NURS FPX6111 Assessment 3 on the prevention of Bullying and gaining knowledge in Nursing is going to be based on the program goals. Primarily, tests to assessments, which are most likely associated with the emotional, cognitive, and psychomotor domains of the Bullying Nursing training module, are cataloged in desk 1. This is to ensure that the information acquired in the test is implemented and that the mindset and behavior are in the direction of patients’ and friends’ exchange. It’s essential to observe their progress. Additionally, the nurse educators rely extensively on contributors who do their post-path checks and offer exact information about the way the path was acquired with the useful resource of the method of university college students (Burgess and Co. in the 12 months 2020). The gorgeousness of a course is likely determined by the availability of students’ feedback on the course. As a consequence, it’s much more important to find out what they presume regarding this device. That is useful because it raises the chance that scholars can be satisfied with the schooling experience and will have maximum enjoyment in the training instead of having bad impressions about the path (Rajabalee and Sanally 2000). ).

NURS FPX6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

The last test encompasses all that it encompasses, beginning with the scholar’s understanding of their feelings and behaviors. Cognitive feature is the way college learners take in information, organize it, and analyze what they have witnessed through the development of expertise and appreciation. Further, although the psychomotor and affective skills of a cognitive are critical towards cognitive functioning, however, they are also crucial to mastery of subject matters and transfers (Horsburgh as well as Ippolito in the year 2018). The mental impact of bullying education in nursing is that it is possible to comprehend, enumerate, and keep the content material emotionally, in addition to its popularity, as well as respond and pose questions that reflect the capability to respond. Imitating examples, following the assembly instance, performing responses, and finishing tasks are all part of the psychomotor domain; however, in the absence of the potential to understand and pick out approximately what is there and what’s there, it’s miles no longer. (Horsburgh and Ippolito, 2018. ).

References

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A. The Melgar-Quinonez family, H. R., and Young, S. L. (2018). Guidelines for developing and validating health scales or Social research. A guide. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(149). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Brown Tyo, M., McCurry, M. K. (2019). An analysis that integrates methodologies for teaching clinical reasoning as well as results evaluation in the field of nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives 40(1) 11-17.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000375
Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., Roberts, C. and Mellis, C. (2020). Feedback within the context of healthcare. BMC Medical Education, 20(S2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02280-5
Divecha, D. Divecha, D. Brackett, M. (2019). Rethinking school bullying prevention through the eyes of emotional and social learning through a bioecological lens. International Journal of Bullying Prevention 2, 93-213.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00019-5
Hogan, R., Orr, F., Fox, D., Cummins, A. and Foureur, M. (2018). The improvement of nurses’ and midwifery students’ capacity to cope with Bullying and aggression within their clinical settings. The students perceive their education as a tool. Nurse Education in Practice 29 (89-94). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.12.002
Horsburgh, J. And Ippolito, K. (2018). This ability could be enhanced by using theories of social learning to analyze the mechanisms of learning by examining the role models of clinical settings. BMC Medical Education, 18(1). https://acemycourse.net/nurs-fpx-6111-assessment-3-course-evaluation-template/

The post NURS FPX6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template appeared first on Online Class Services.