digitalmediawritings

The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation Discussion Paper

The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation Discussion Paper

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

The selected healthcare program for this exercise is the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Cancer Moonshot Initiative that was launched eight years ago. In their explanation about the program, Shiramizu et al. (2017) wrote that it is a collaborative effort whose main objective is to accelerate cancer research and breakthroughs. Its primary areas of focus as explained by the same researchers include precision medicine, immunotherapy, and data sharing. This initiative seeks to make significant strides in understanding, preventing, and treating cancer. The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation Discussion Paper

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

A Federal Policy Evaluation of the Program

In order to ensure that this program operates as planned and maintains focus of meeting its objectives, there are policies in place to check on this. Drawing from this, the current federal policy evaluation of the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Cancer Moonshot Initiative makes use of a comprehensive approach that keenly examines a handful of facets to gauge the degree of effectiveness of the program. Among the criteria used to carry the evaluation is the quantifiable advancement in cancer research. According to Glasgow et al. (2003), a lot of emphasis is placed on breakthroughs, novel therapies, and most importantly the translation of discoveries made in the laboratories and research centers into clinical applications. A metric that is perhaps the most important are patient outcomes. These outcomes cover aspects like improvements in the rates of cancer survival, the changes in quality of life, and the accessibility of cutting-edge treatments.

An aspect of this evaluation that warrants mention is the evaluation of the degree of collaboration adopted. Writing on this, Shiramizu et al. (2017) highlighted that the evaluation looks into the extent of interdisciplinary cooperation and data-sharing mechanisms. An important aspect that is especially focused on here is transparency in funding allocation. The evaluation ensures that the allocation of resources from funding align with strategic priorities. Research has shown that all too often, innovation integration is regularly appraised for its potential to drive transformative change in cancer care. The adherence to and impact on national cancer research priorities by the program is a key determinant of its effectiveness. A third aspect of the evaluation is strategic engagement. Through this, the government is able to assess the involvement and satisfaction of key participants. The purpose here is to ensure that diverse perspectives contribute to the success of the initiative. The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation Discussion Paper

Impact of Social Determinants of Health

Research has shown that social determinants of health have material influence on the landscape of cancer care and the efficacy of programs aimed at addressing this such as the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Cancer Moonshot (Williams & Anderson, 2018). A notable social determinant in this context is disparity in access to healthcare services, education, and economic resources. Research shows that these individually and collectively contribute to unequal cancer outcomes. Persons with relatively lower socioeconomic status face barriers to early detection and quality treatment. The outcome of this is facilitating health disparities. Lifestyle factors such as diet and tobacco use are impacted by the highlighted social determinants which ultimately heightens the risk of cancer. To guarantee the success of the program, the Cancer Moonshot Initiative needs to address these social determinants. This is important as it would ensure equitable access to innovative treatments and interventions. Equally important, community engagement and education programs are necessary because they would help add the benefit of bridging the gaps in awareness and empower individuals to seek preventive measures. Collaboration with community organizations can enhance outreach to underserved populations. The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation Discussion Paper

References

Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American journal of public health93(8), 1261-1267. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261

Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2017). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities4, 983-991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-016-0302-4

Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing outlook66(4), 386-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2018.05.003

Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.

ORDER NOW

Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.

Post an evaluation topic and a brief description of the evaluation. Discuss how social determinants impact this issue.

Please these references below: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation Discussion Paper
Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition
Links to an external site.. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.
Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities
Links to an external site.. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991.
Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations
Links to an external site.. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393. The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation Discussion Paper

Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.

ORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH

PLACE YOUR ORDER

SHARE WITH FRIENDS