Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Assignment

Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Assignment

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Unit One Discussion for MHC Aging

The selected standardized measurement scale for psychiatric practice is CTRS (cognitive therapy Rating Scale). This scale is an observer model of clients seeking cognitive behavior therapy management. The use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a prominent treatment option for mental health illnesses such as anxiety and depression. The manner of executing CBTs in patient care is an issue of concern such that when not applied well it can cause negative outcomes (Goldberg et al., 2020). This is addressed using two fidelity measures including adherence and competence.  Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Assignment

The CTRS evaluates the competency of cognitive therapy features. The scale has measures of up to 11 items that are matched or scored on a Likert scale with 7-points where 6 is excellent and 0 is poor. The CBT has for a long time used an estimated score of 40 in measuring competence. These items as listed are crucial in assessing therapeutic interaction skills such as interpersonal wellness. Also, the use of CBT helps in identifying critical skills in behaviors cognition, and structure such as agenda setting (Affrunti, 2019).

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The tool is reliable since it provides a straightforward model for evaluating the clients’ behaviors. This helps in the swift diagnosis and management of different levels of psychiatric issues. Also, this tool is helpful to the therapists since it offers directions and suggestions about multiple issues being exacerbated by the client. Additionally, this tool is valid since it is made up of a stable structure that brings internal consistency based on diverse factors (Rodriguez-Quinana et al., 2021). Also, the response rates of the client towards this measurement tool are positive hence proving its effectiveness in addressing psychiatric issues.  Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Assignment

References

Affrunti, N.W., Creed, T.A. (2019). The Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS) in a Sample of Community Mental Health Clinicians. Cogn Ther Res 43, 642–655 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-09998-7

Goldberg, S. B., Baldwin, S. A., Merced, K., Caperton, D. D., Imel, Z. E., Atkins, D. C., & Creed, T. (2020). The Structure of Competence: Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale. Behavior therapy, 51(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.008

Rodriguez-Quinana, N., Choi, S. Y., Bilek, E., Koschmann, E., Albrecht, J., Prisbe, M., & Smith, S. (2021). The Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Competence Scale (CCS): initial development and validation. Cognitive behavior therapist, 14, E39. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1754470x21000362 Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Assignment

PMHNPs use rating scales for reasons such as screening, collection of information, standardization of data, tracking changes, measuring severity, and formal evaluation of performance. Select a standardized measurement scales for psychiatric practice and briefly summarizes the scale, including the purpose, reliability, internal consistency, and validity. Use evidence-based research to support your data.

Refer to the grading rubric for requirements, including the evidence-based references. Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Assignment