Critical Appraisal Of Research Assignment Discussion

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Evidence-Based Practice Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research. Critical Appraisal Of Research Assignment Discussion

Evaluation Table

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Full APA formatted citation of selected article.	Article #1	Article #2	Article #3	Article #4
Full APA formatted citation of selected article.	Bangani, R. G., Menon, V., & Jovanov, E. (2021). Personalized stress monitoring AI system for healthcare workers. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). https://doi.org/10.1109/bibm52615.2021.9669321	Greco, E., Graziano, E. A., Stella, G. P., Mastrodascio, M., & Cedrone, F. (2022). The impact of leadership on perceived work-related stress in healthcare facilities organisations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(4/5), 734–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-07-2021-0201	Grünheid, T., & Hazem, A. (2023). Mental Wellbeing of Frontline Health Workers Post-pandemic: Lessons learned and a way forward. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1204662	Maple, J.-L., Willis, K., Lewis, S., Putland, M., Baldwin, P., Bismark, M., Harrex, W., Johnson, D., Karimi, L., & Smallwood, N. (2024). Healthcare Workers’ perceptions of strategies supportive of their mental health. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100049
Evidence Level * (I, II, or III)	II	II	II	II
Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study (If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here).**	Inferred	Inferred.	Inferred.	Inferred.
Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria).	Prospective cohort study using wearable sensors and AI.	Quantitative mixed methods approach. Regression analysis was performed on the questionnaire answers, which were based on a multiple case study technique utilized in two Italian health care institutions.	Prospective online study. The questionnaire included questions to identify practical methods for enhancing the emotional wellbeing of these healthcare professionals as well as proven instruments to assess the degree of depression, perceived stress, and mental health status.	A prospective online survey of healthcare workers in Australia during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc.	Healthcare institution. Sample was healthcare workers.	Healthcare institution. Sample was healthcare workers.	Healthcare institution. Sample was healthcare workers.	Healthcare institution. Sample was healthcare workers.
Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables	Independent: A stressful working environment. Dependent: Occurrence of stress as evidenced by monitoring devices and answers to questions.	Independent: A stressful working environment. Dependent: Occurrence of stress as evidenced by monitoring devices and answers to questions.	Independent: A stressful working environment. Dependent: Occurrence of stress as evidenced by monitoring devices and answers to questions.	Independent: A stressful working environment. Dependent: Occurrence of stress as evidenced by monitoring devices and answers to questions.
Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions (You need to list the actual tests done).	Descriptive and nonparametric tests (for inference)Critical Appraisal Of Research Assignment Discussion.	Multiple regression analysis (nonparametric inferential testing).	Descriptive and inferential (aggregation and stratification).	Descriptive and nonparametric tests (for inference).
Data Analysis Statistical or Qualitative findings (You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data).	According to preliminary findings, the suggested stress monitoring model is capable of accurately predicting the occurrence of any stress.	The findings indicate that among health care workers, perceptions of supportive leadership are associated with perceptions of negative psychosocial risks, proximity to which may result in WRS expression during the COVID-19 pandemic.	All categories of health workers had fair mental health status, significantly greater perceived stress levels than normal, and mild to moderately severe depression on average. Among doctors, dentists, medical personnel, and dental staff, there were no appreciable variations in the degree of depression, stress, or mental health.	The results emphasized the difficulties faced by frontline personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic and provided recommendations for organizational tactics to enhance the long-term mental health of the health staff. In particular, four major elements that connected organizational culture and support techniques for the latter were found.
Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research	According to preliminary findings, the suggested stress monitoring model is capable of accurately predicting the occurrence of any stress. The investigators in this research effort have recommended that tools be Availed for healthcare professionals so that these may assist in detecting elevated stress levels to allow for remedial action before adverse outcomes become apparent.	The findings indicate that among health care workers, perceptions of supportive leadership are associated with perceptions of negative psychosocial risks, proximity to which may result in WRS expression during the COVID-19 pandemic.	All categories of health workers had fair mental health status, elevated levels of stress as well as pathological degrees of depression and anxiety. Surprisingly, physicians and dentists never showed any signs or indications of raised stress levels or depressive symptoms.	The results emphasized the difficulties faced by frontline personnel during the recent global pandemic. The study makes some far-reaching suggestions on how to help healthcare personnel maintain required mental health hygiene for better patient outcomes at these times. In this respect, the results unveiled four main elements for consideration.
*Appraisal and Study Quality* Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice?	It adds to the current EBP knowledge. Strength: primary research. Limitation: Methodological soundness. Implementation feasible with no risks foreseen.	It adds to the current EBP knowledge. Strength: primary research. Limitation: Methodological soundness. Implementation feasible with no risks foreseen.	It adds to the current EBP knowledge. Strength: primary research. Limitation: Methodological soundness. Implementation feasible with no risks foreseen.	It adds to the current EBP knowledge. Strength: primary research. Limitation: Methodological soundness. Implementation feasible with no risks foreseen.
Key findings	According to preliminary findings, the suggested stress monitoring model is capable of accurately predicting the occurrence of any stress.	The findings indicate that among health care workers, perceptions of supportive leadership are associated with perceptions of negative psychosocial risks, proximity to which may result in WRS expression during the COVID-19 pandemic.	All categories of health workers had fair mental health status, elevated levels of stress as well as pathological degrees of depression and anxiety. Surprisingly, physicians and dentists never showed any signs or indications of raised stress levels or depressive symptoms.	The results emphasized the difficulties faced by frontline personnel during the recent global pandemic. The study makes some far-reaching suggestions on how to help healthcare personnel maintain required mental health hygiene for better patient outcomes at these times. In this respect, the results unveiled four main elements for consideration.
Outcomes	A high pressure workplace is a factor in the increased stress levels of frontline healthcare workers such as nurses.	A high pressure workplace is a factor in the increased stress levels of frontline healthcare workers such as nurses.	A high pressure workplace is a factor in the increased stress levels of frontline healthcare workers such as nurses.	A high pressure workplace is a factor in the increased stress levels of frontline healthcare workers such as nurses.
General Notes/Comments	The study adds to the available EBP knowledge.	The study adds to the available EBP knowledge.	The study adds to the available EBP knowledge.	The study adds to the available EBP knowledge.

ORDER HERE

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

According to preliminary findings, the suggested stress monitoring model is capable of accurately predicting the occurrence of any stress (Bangani et al., 2021). The findings indicate that among health care workers, perceptions of supportive leadership are associated with perceptions of negative psychosocial risks, proximity to which may result in WRS expression during the COVID-19 pandemic (Greco et al., 2022). All categories of health workers had fair mental health status, elevated levels of stress as well as pathological degrees of depression and anxiety. Surprisingly, physicians and dentists never showed any signs or indications of raised stress levels or depressive symptoms (Grünheid & Hazem, 2023). Lastly, according to Maple et al. (2024), the findings highlighted the challenges faced by frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and offered suggestions for organizational strategies to improve the health staff’s long-term mental health. Specifically, four key components were discovered that linked corporate culture with strategies for the latter Critical Appraisal Of Research Assignment Discussion.

References

Bangani, R. G., Menon, V., & Jovanov, E. (2021). Personalized stress monitoring AI system for healthcare workers. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). https://doi.org/10.1109/bibm52615.2021.9669321

Greco, E., Graziano, E. A., Stella, G. P., Mastrodascio, M., & Cedrone, F. (2022). The impact of leadership on perceived work-related stress in healthcare facilities organisations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(4/5), 734–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-07-2021-0201

Grünheid, T., & Hazem, A. (2023). Mental Wellbeing of Frontline Health Workers Post-pandemic: Lessons learned and a way forward. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1204662

Maple, J.-L., Willis, K., Lewis, S., Putland, M., Baldwin, P., Bismark, M., Harrex, W., Johnson, D., Karimi, L., & Smallwood, N. (2024). Healthcare Workers’ perceptions of strategies supportive of their mental health. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100049 Critical Appraisal Of Research Assignment Discussion

Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.

ORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH