digitalmediawritings

CUW Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA Principal and Community Member Interview solution  

CUW Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA Principal and Community Member Interview  
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

CUW Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA Principal and Community Member Interview  

Description

Principal Interview: Discuss the school’s vision and the perception of its implementation. Also, discuss the visioning process in relation to stakeholder collaboration in its development. Discuss her/his understanding of ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) and the educational philosophy of assessing student academic growth. Also, how are the report card and various academic assessment data used to determine school improvement priorities? Discuss your understanding of your student academic identified area of need based on your data analysis. At this meeting, obtain your principal’s signature on the Principal Approval Form, and include in the appendix of your paper. Questions include:

 

Who participated in the school visioning process?

What is your perception of our school vision implementation?

Are the Every Student Succeed Act (ESSA) data shared, discussed, and analyzed with the faculty?

When and how are academic student assessments conducted in the school/district?

How are these data used in the school improvement process?

How are priorities of student academic needs determined in the school improvement planning process?

What is your perspective on the student academic need I have identified?

Do you think an action plan based on this needs assessment would be supported in our school?

To what extent is the culture of our school supportive of implementing any change emanating from my improvement project?

Community Member Interview: Explain to your principal that you plan on interviewing a community member. Interview an adult member of the community (e.g., parent, local resident, business owner) to include his/her understanding of the school’s area of need that you are analyzing. Analyze the community’s perception of the school, determine ways to collaborate with the community, involve them in decision making, and assist with identification of resources to support your area of focus. Discuss how the culture of the school supports change. Questions include:

What is your perception of our school vision implementation?

What is your understanding of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) legislation and the shift in the educational philosophy with respect to student growth assessment related to school improvement?

Are the Every Student Succeed Act (ESSA) data shared, discussed, and analyzed with the community members?

How are community members involved in determining the priorities of student academic needs in the school improvement planning process?

What is your perception of the community collaboration in assessing future issues that affect school and leadership practices?

What is your perspective on the student academic need I have identified?

In addition, if you are a teacher, you will need to provide information about your work with families and/or community groups and a description of how this work affected instruction or class activities.

If you are not a teacher, you will need to provide information about your work with families and/or community groups and a description of how this work affected students’ academic, social, emotional and/or behavioral outcomes,

The paper is to be 4 pages of text plus the CUC Honor Code, title page, and references. This assignment should not include names; refer to positions only. The paper must reflect APA format and follow this structure:

CUC Honor Code Cover Sheet

Title Page

Abstract

Title and Introductory Paragraph

Summary of Interview-Principal

Summary of Interview- Community Member

Analysis of Interviews (In the analysis section, compare and contrast responses to common questions.)

Impact of Work with Families and Community

Conclusions

References

Appendix (list of interview questions; signed copy of Principal Approval Form)

 

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

 

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84  points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76  points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49  points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.

ORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH

PLACE YOUR ORDER

SHARE WITH FRIENDS