DNP 815 Week 2 Assignment Connecting Nursing Theory

• DNP 815 Week 2 Assignment Connecting Nursing Theory. 

Connecting Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Models

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is an unequivocal technique for supervising clinical idea that includes the put down some a reasonable compromise of everything that could be expected to track down evidence, clinical capacity, and patient credits to provide guidance and focus on forging ahead through results (Uppal et al., 2023). EBP is boss in guaranteeing that clinical practices in the quickly making and dynamic clinical benefits field depend on the latest assessment openings and line up with patients’ striking necessities and affinities.

Evidence-Based Interventions in Nursing

The New Turn of Events, Execution, and Assessment (DPI) Undertaking revolves around managing tolerant thought through evidence-based mediation, a central nursing exertion. This errand will work with a nursing hypothesis with a change-based model to address openings between theoretical information and clearheaded execution. In this way, the DPI project hopes to fortify a culture of unsurprising improvement inside the nursing calling by guaranteeing that mediations are told by totally minded hypotheses and remained mindful of by the latest observational proof.

Theoretical Foundations

The theory is doubtlessly significant in nursing, helping and impacting the activities of experts in the clinical field. Nursing inspector Nola Pender’s “Prospering Advancement Model” (HPM) was picked as the nursing hypothesis for the DPI undertaking (Khodaveisi et al., 2019).

• Prospering Advancement Model in DPI

Since it is based on a widely expansive method that considers discrete highlights encounters and directs clear understandings, this hypothesis is particularly genuine to the undertaking’s objectives. The Prospering Advancement Model aligns with the DPI Undertaking’s motivation for chipping away at tolerant thought by joining nursing hypotheses with evidence-based change models. It gives a total viewpoint on the factors impacting thriving-related standards of lead and provides direction for persuading interventions.

• Nursing Theory

The Achievement Development Model, which Nola Pender presented in the last 50% of the twentieth 100 years, rotates around the proactive progression of prospering rather than fundamentally beguiling confusion (John Erik Meyer, 2022). Per Pender’s hypothesis, people truly embrace part in strategies to acting that they should remain mindful of and work on their degree of flood.

As indicated by an overall perspective, the HPM contemplates the social, regular, and portrayed affiliations that affect direct and flourishing. Contemplations like self-common sense, cutoff centers and advantages, and commitment to a goal are essential for the theory. Together, these fragments empower our understanding of people’s principal objective for flourishing related decisions and shed light on the system and execution of accomplishment-driving interventions.

Applying the Thriving Development Model in DPI

The Thriving Development Model is fundamental for the DPI Errand since it will generally be applied to various clinical thought settings and works with evidence-based practices. Nursing professionals could use the information to uncover data about the cycles that license patients to participate in the affiliation’s flourishing by checking on the HPM for the project’s framework.

The DPI Experience’s reasonable interventions to patients’ excellent basics and tendencies line up with the model’s element of secret bits of information and inspirations. Furthermore, the Achievement Progress Model gives theoretical help to inducing evidence-based interventions that mean to progress, keep up with succeeding and thriving long stretches, and address present clinical issues. As the DPI Undertaking makes, coordinating the Achievement Progress Model into nursing practice is essential for seeing patient-centered, evidence-based care and changing theories to striking structures for further flourishing outcomes.

• Theory

Nola Pender’s Thriving Development Model (HPM) has been chosen as the nursing hypothesis for the DPI Undertaking. This hypothetical plan connects a couple of major stages and parts important to understanding and influencing ways of managing acting related to flourishing. On a staggeringly major level, the HPM segregates direct expressions of information and individual characteristics and relationships as chief factors influencing flourishing practices (Ngwazini, 2022).

The hypothesis’ principal parts are self-legitimacy, saw benefits and drawbacks, and commitment to an action plan. These methodologies and factors are used in the DPI Errand to enable evidence-based mediations that separate patients’ particular basics and affinities. Nursing professionals could use the HPM’s inclination to customize intercessions, work on understanding liability, and advance proactive flourishing by organizing it into the gig.

• Clinical Question

This part examines how the clinical question aligns with the lone nursing theory.
“To what degree does the execution of prospering driving (intervention) impacts directed by Nola Pender’s Flourishing Advancement Model (HPM) impact self-sensibility and achievement results (what) when stood out from customary thought among diabetic patient (people) patients in an ongoing second (setting) in a transient office setting in California (state)?”

• Synthesis of Theory

Different evidence-based papers, Research studies, and mate outline drives have utilized and dismantled Nola Pender’s Flourishing Development Model (HPM), giving essential encounters into its sensible motivations in nursing. A study by Durham et al. (2023) used the HPM to design and evaluate a program for thriving preparation, including progressing certified work among extra-settled adults (Durham et al., 2023). The audit’s revelations showed how intercessions based on the HPM, in a general sense, expanded individuals’ self-reachability and commitment to dynamic work, showing the model’s sensibility for directing ways of managing acting that advance flourishing.

• Summary

The Flourishing Advancement Model’s flexibility and solace in directing evidence-based interventions in different clinical idea settings are featured by its participation in these various appraisals.

From connecting more settled grown-ups to help fiery adults stop smoking to working on flourishing those with conditions, the HPM persistently can reveal guaranteed interventions that lead to amazing outcomes concerning capital. As we bounce further into the going with section, this gathered information from different HPM applications will enlighten the reasoning and method behind our DPI Errand, featuring the need to work with this nursing hypothesis into proof set up practice for work concerning liberal thought.

Evidence-based Change Model

It provides a valuable system for handling errands, including receiving evidence-based work and ensuring that changes are thought out, truly done, and cost-really planned into clinical work processes. The “Transtheoretical Model of Change” (TTM) has been picked as the evidence-based change perspective for the DPI Experience.

This perspective, made by Prochaska and DiClemente, sees that individuals travel through a few moderate stages, including pre-thought, discussion, status, improvement, sponsorship, and end, all of which call for express intercession (Rahimi et al., 2019). As discussed in DNP 815 Week 2 Assignment Connecting Nursing Theory, the TTM’s emphasis on understanding and dealing with a particular circumstance for change aligns with the errand’s fairness in assembling nursing theory with a model that executes the persuading thought concerning social clinical thought shift practices.

• Change Model

Prochaska and DiClemente’s Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is the evidence-based change model decided for the DPI Undertaking. This acceptance is achieved after observing individuals go through unambiguous stages while making charming changes. These stages involve contemplation, thinking, openness, movement, support, and conclusion.

Each step looks at a fascinating strategy of thought and direct cycles, including the meaning of fitting mediations to help a particular’s transparency for change. The Achievement Development Model (HPM) evidence-based mediations are being done in the DPI Experience under the direction of the TTM. The hours of the TTM line up with the principal thought of change directly, ensuring that mediations are fittingly planned and acclimated to meet patients’ driving necessities.

Transtheoretical Model: Framework for Evidence-Based Change

The 1983 development “Transtheoretical Therapy: Toward a More Integrative Model of Change” by Prochaska and DiClemente is seen as a basic mark of intermingling for the TTM. This source recalls the TTM’s fittingness for various settings for change directly by outlining its central examinations and stages.

The TTM’s idea of understanding the unquestionable pieces of change in ways to deal with acting lines up with the project’s goals, ensuring that mediations are reasonably coordinated and grounded in evidence to expand their impact on broadened-length results. The TTM fills in as fundamental assistance as the DPI Undertaking progresses, giving a purposeful framework to figure out evidence-based practices in nursing care while contemplating the exceptional and making necessities of the patient people.

• Clinical Question

“To what degree does the execution of evidence-based interventions directed by the Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) influence the improvement of diabetic patients through the hours of lead change, went from customary thought, in a fluttering office setting in California?”

• Synthesis of Evidence-based Change Model

Research studies, evidence-based papers, and friend-examined drives have applied the Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) in various clinical thought conditions. The TTM was used in Research by Liu et al. (2020) to make and survey a smoking suspension program for young people (Liu et al., 2020). The assessment showed that fitting mediations for the specific moderate stages expanded smoking end rates, showing the TTM’s chance to look for direct standards in a formative environment.

Furthermore, an assessment done by Hanna Luetke Lanfer (2021) used the TTM to advance authentic work in fixed grown-ups (Hanna Luetke Lanfer, 2021). The study revealed that intercessions concurred with the Hypothesis that working with Lead evoked a tremendous affirmation of the customary technique for overseeing acting, featuring the model’s solace in directing people through the different times of social change, from evaluation to ensuring.

• Summary

In this summary, the TTM’s coordination will be a true tool as we push ahead with the DPI Experience, ensuring that evidence-based mediations are taught by nursing theory and agreed with a strong procedure for directing and overseeing conduct change.

The blend of the TTM’s applications and the general experiences obtained from the clinical deals plan will uncover data into the course of events and the execution of intercessions, empowering a patient-focused and stage-unequivocal procedure inside the project. The DPI Undertaking system will be examined in the ongoing area, addressing the decided advances used to work with the Transtheoretical Model of Change with the Thriving Improvement Model for ideal outcomes in nursing practice and patient ideas.

Linking Nursing Theory, Change, and Model to the Direct Practice Improvement Project

The rising prevalence of diabetes has become a principal issue that should be carefully considered and resolved as a savvy strategy for handling its confounding ramifications for serene thriving and achievement. An evaluation directed at our clinical advantages district uncovered a gigantic opening in the evidence-based treatment plan for patients with diabetes, particularly in progress development and change interventions.

• Improving Patient Outcomes with TTM and HPM

The lack of helpful procedures by nursing hypotheses and evidence-based change models adds to appalling patient outcomes. It fails to give ways to deal with peopling to take part in their flourishing. By driving an exhaustive thriving improvement mediation depicted in the Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) and the Prospering Headway Model (HPM), this quality improvement effort necessities to close this opening.

Therefore, the inspiration driving this quality improvement project was to pick whether or to what degree the execution of careful thriving advancement intervention, directed by the Achievement Development Model (HPM) and the Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM), would affect self-abundancy and the headway through seasons of lead change (intervention) would move grown-up diabetic patients (what) when stood out from ebb and flow practice among transient focus setting in California over twelve weeks.

Conclusion

The DPI project’s focal trait is chipping away at tolerant thoughts for people with diabetes in shuddering office settings in California. This trait agrees with the blend of the Transtheoretical Model of Progress (TTM) and the Achievement Progress Model (HPM). The HPM stays aware of the TTM by providing a strong foundation for figuring out the complexities of succeeding and driving ways of managing acting. The HPM emphasizes the significance of individual credits and directs unequivocal observations.

For instance, in TTM-directed interventions, the HPM helps with fitting plans to the particular nuts and bolts of diabetes patients, tending to factors like extraordinary judgment, perceived benefits, and obstructions. As highlighted in DNP 815 Week 2 Assignment Connecting Nursing Theory, the TTM upgrades the HPM by providing an organized methodology for controlling and managing behavior change, aligning with the nonlinear and dynamic qualities of actions that promote thriving, as displayed in the HPM.

The HPM’s focus on standard, social, and coordinated components becomes key in creating interventions that address the diverse needs of diabetes patients at various stages of change. For example, the HPM considers individual motivations and barriers during the evaluation stage, ensuring that interventions are appropriately tailored to maximize patient engagement.

References

Durham, L., Davis, L., Kelly, T., Kennedy, R., Smith, D., & Cedillo, Y. (2023). Role of sociodemographic, academic, and individual health behaviors on psychological well-being among college students. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 55(7, Supplement), 28–29.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2023.05.062

Hanna Luetke Lanfer. (2021). Through a lens of scarcity. In Gesundheit und Gesellschaft.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34914-1

John Erik Meyer. (2022). Society, energy, and the natural world. Springer EBooks, 1–20.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91782-1_1

Khodaveisi, M., Jafari, A., Omidi, A., Roshanaei, G., & Sazvar, A. (2019). The effect of a Pender’s health promotion model-based educational intervention on physical activity in office staff. Sport Sciences for Health, 16(1).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-019-00568-8

Liu, J., Gaiha, S. M., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2020). A breath of knowledge: Overview of adolescent e-cigarette prevention and cessation programs. Current Addiction Reports, 7(4).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-020-00345-5

Ngwazini, C. (2022). Implementing Nola Pender’s “clinical assessment for health promotion plan” to increase patient self-efficacy, weight loss, and health-promoting behaviors such as improving nutrition and increased physical activity in obese women in a weight loss clinic. Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Manuscripts.

https://doi.org/10.22371/07.2022.043

Rahimi, A., Hashemzadeh, M., Zare-Farashbandi, F., Alavi-Naeini, A., & Daei, A. (2019). The transtheoretical model of health behavioral change: A systematic review. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 24(2), 83–90.

https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_94_17

Uppal, V., Russell, R., Sondekoppam, R. V., Ansari, J., Baber, Z., Chen, Y., DelPizzo, K., Dirzu, D. S., Kalagara, H., Kissoon, N. R., Kranz, P. G., Leffert, L., Lim, G., Lobo, C., Lucas, D. N., Moka, E., Rodriguez, S. E., Sehmbi, H., Vallejo, M. C., & Volk, T. (2023). Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on post-dural puncture headache: A multi-society international working group consensus report. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104817