digitalmediawritings

Ethical Theories Comparison Chart Assignment Paper

Ethical Theories Comparison Chart Assignment Paper

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

comparison chart asking and answering these questions
-How is “good” determined
-Most noted Philosophers
-Major Strengths
-Major Weaknesses
I need it on these-
• Unit 2: Utilitarianism, Ethical Egoism, Kantianism, and Divine Command Theory
• Unit 3: Virtue Theory
• Unit 5: Natural Law and Rawls’ Theory of Justice
• Unit 7: Prima Facie Duties and Ethics of Care
and ill upload a file for how it should look

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

There are different ethical theories, each holding a different view regarding ethics. Some theories include virtue theory, utilitarianism, Kantianism, and ethics of care. While the primary focus is to explain ethics and ethical considerations, each theory varies concerning how they respond to questions such as determining good. These philosophers contributed to the theories as well as their strengths and weaknesses. The table below provides a detailed comparison chart of the different ethical theories Ethical Theories Comparison Chart Assignment Paper.

Theory

Question

Utilitarianism

(Unit 2)

Ethical Egoism

(Unit 2)

Kantianism

(Unit 2)

Divine Command Theory

(Unit 2)

How is “good” determined? It is determined by the feeling of pleasure and joy, as it must result in the production of happiness hence promoting goodness in people An act that promotes a person’s goodness aligns with morality. More so, it must serve an individual’s long-term interest A good act is founded on reason and duty and becomes ethical if every person subscribes to it Adherence to God’s Commands and religious beliefs, regardless of the consequences that might occur
Most noted philosopher(s) Major contributors include; Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill Ayn Rand and Max Sterner Immanuel Kant John Duns and William of Ockham
Major Strengths The theory is focused on maximizing happiness and hence beneficial to all

It is also to understand and be driven to minimize pain while maximizing pleasure

Promotes an individual’s Freedom and responsibility being easy for one to determine self-interests Promotes individual rights Builds on religions and provides people with moral law and motivation to follow it
Major Weaknesses It is hard for an individual to be perfect or please everyone It can result in individualism as it addresses individual happiness; hence one can be viewed as selfish The theory is more focused on one duty over the drive to do good While being based on religion, the evil has equally been done by the religious people, hence contrary to the theory itself
Continuation        
Virtue Theory

(Unit 3)

Natural Law

(Unit 5)

Rawls’ Theory of Justice

(Unit 5)

Ross’ Prima Facie Duties

(Unit 7)

Ethics of Care

(Unit 7)

The good is determined by individuals bettering themselves by making the right decisions The theory regarded good as what is to be done and evil as what ought to be avoided The good is regarded as something that results in the satisfaction f the rational desires By following one duty which you are assigned, hence being good

More so, an Act is good when there is moral reason in support of the act

Good is determined by the ability of the action to promote or hold interpersonal relationships high
Aristotle and Confucius Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, and Plato John Rawl William David Ross Gilligan Carrol
Unites a person’s emotions and reasoning

It also focused on the attainment of high-level moral behavior as people learn via practice

A major strength is that the theory focuses or is founded on reasoning, not a revelation

It is universal and absolutist hence relevant

it provides people with a specific tool to avoid any bias while valuing Freedom The theory focuses on people’s commonsense moral commitments

People should focus on keeping promises and being honest

The theory provides a counter to weaknesses in moral theories and emotions aligned with moral reasoning
It is hard to determine the critical virtues that one ought to get to be regarded as ethical It is not a simple school of thought

It is based solely on the right reasoning, which is not a guarantee

However, the theory lacks consistency

It excludes promoting rationality and hence being biased in favor of rationality

The theory can result in assumption thinking hence resulting in trouble or one being left in messy situations Criticized for the view, it promotes female values over male ones.

Theories required by unit:

  • Unit 2: Utilitarianism, Ethical Egoism, Kantianism, and Divine Command Theory
  • Unit 3: Virtue Theory
  • Unit 5: Natural Law and Rawls’ Theory of Justice
  • Unit 7: Prima Facie Duties and Ethics of Care Ethical Theories Comparison Chart Assignment Paper

 

Theory Utilitarianism

(Unit 2)

Ethical Egoism

(Unit 2)

Kantianism

(Unit 2)

Divine Command Theory

(Unit 2)

How is “good” determined? The amount of good is determined by the number of increasing the number of good things in the world to limit and lower the bad things. Ethical Egoism looks out for long term self-interest. This avoids conflict between self-interest and morality Good is determined by the belief of good will. Be reasonable on good or bad. For good to be determined it is in god’s hands. For a person to be moral he shall follow god’s commands.
Most noted philosopher(s) Jeremy Bentham

John Stuart Mill

Ayn Rand

Max Sterner

Immanuel Kant Socrates

Plato

Major Strengths -Emphasis on neutrality

-Flexibility

-Major chance at personal improvement

-Reach full potential

-Quality of universality

-Eradicates bias

-Religion

-God as leader

Major Weaknesses -Can justify anything

-Happiness is subjective

-Destructive to community

-Arbitrary

-Contradicts itself and has compatibilism issues

-Partially goes against human nature

-outdated

-Subjectivity of God

Virtue Theory

(Unit 3)

Natural Law

(Unit 5)

Rawls’ Theory of Justice

(Unit 5)

Ross’ Prima Facie Duties

(Unit 7)

Ethics of Care

(Unit 7)

Good is determined as actions that display embody virtuous character traits. Acts that uphold the precepts are deemed good, acts that do not are deemed bad. Determined by the satisfaction of rational desires. Every individual makes their own plan. When there is a moral reason in favor of doing the act. The relationship with the other person must exist and must have potential to grow
-Plato

-Aristotle

-Aristotle is said to be the father to natural law but that may be from Thomas Aquinas given interpretation to his work. -John Rawls is the most noted as it has his name in it. -William David Ross -Coral Gilligan

-Nel Noddings

-Honesty

-Compassion

-Based on reasoning and not revelation

-Has a purpose

-Very comprehensive

-Value freedom

-Fidelity/ keeping their promises

-Honoring agreements

-Recognizes weakness in moral theories

-Allows to focus on our energy

-Happiness on individual

-No Guidance

-Stresses what ought to be done

 

-Equality is impossible as people are victims.

-very poor nations

-Based on intuition

-Can be misapplied and lead to a cover up

-Threatens to devolve into tribalism

-Misguidance

Ethical Theories Comparison Chart Assignment Paper

Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.

ORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH

PLACE YOUR ORDER

SHARE WITH FRIENDS