Exploring Censorship’s Impact on Society: A Balanced Perspective and Caution

Exploring Censorship’s Impact on Society: A Balanced Perspective and Caution

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Instructions

Exploring Censorship’s Impact on Society: A Balanced Perspective and Caution

In the end, this essay has done quite a good job at asking society to examine the ways in which censorship is done. It’s a perfect balance between life experience and overall empathy towards others who have gone through traumatizing events. It challenges those who read it to take a deeper look at just how much censorship has grown in the past few years, and it calls for those who have gone through traumatic events to become stronger in the face of that trauma. It can also act as a warning that even though efforts are being made to “protect” people from harmful content it is not wise to fall into the illusion of safety.

Work Cited

Gaye, Roxane. “The Illusion of Safety/The Safety of Illusion”. Bad Feminist: Essays. HarperCollins, 2014. 147-153

Association for Psychological Science. “Trigger warnings do little to reduce people’s distress, research shows.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 19 March 2019. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/03/190319142312.htm>.’

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!