Greenpeace Swot Analysis

PHD Writers US

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Greenpeace Swot Analysis

Greenpeace Swot Analysis

Order ID 53003233773
Type Essay
Writer Level Masters
Style APA
Sources/References 4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions

Greenpeace Swot Analysis


Greenpeace has prevailed with regards to accomplishing its underlying goal, which was to stop the US’s atomic weapon testing in The Frozen North. The organization’s projects, campaigns, and activities have been funded by supporters, allowing it to grow continuously. Climate change, deforestation, overfishing, commercial whaling, genetic modification of life forms, and atomic conflict are their primary areas of focus (Collins, 1985). The organization uses marches, protests, and campaigns to spread its beliefs about climate change, overfishing, deforestation, commercial whaling, and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Greenpeace SWOT Analysis


According to the SWOT analysis, one of Greenpeace’s primary strengths is the organization’s regional presence in numerous regions. It guarantees that the objective market is effectively open and decides the organization’s span.

The extensive product portfolio of the company has the potential to support it in both expanding its customer base and achieving a healthy equilibrium between losses from one product category and profits from others.

Positive e-WOM can have a more noteworthy effect when joined with a powerful web-based entertainment board procedure and a solid web-based presence in different informal communication locales.

Competent and dedicated human capital can provide a significant competitive advantage for a company that is primarily focused on providing services.

High product quality boosts Greenpeace’s performance in a market with a lot of competition.

A company that plans to expand internationally may also benefit greatly from workplace diversity.


The association may be criticized by hippies for its lack of waste management strategies and inability to integrate manageability into business tasks.

Due to inaccurate information about the local and global market, the organization’s execution may suffer as a result of less spending on innovative work activities.

A failure to comprehend the requirements and expectations of customers results in an ineffective strategy decision-making process (Mays, 2019). The organization probably won’t have the option to track down the item/administration blend regions that need improvement as a result of this shortcoming.


The company stands a good chance of expanding as the population grows at an exponential rate, particularly in the customer segments that it serves now and in the future.

If the company has accurate market data, the shifting preferences, tastes, and wants of its customers resulting from the lawsuits may present an opportunity for it.

It is possible to increase product quality by increasing the discretionary cash flow of customers and expanding a loyal customer base.

The business association can raise reserves and get support at a lower cost given the loan fee decrease.

Because of moving inclinations, clients might start to favor novel and innovative labor and products.


Greenpeace faces a significant threat from the introduction of new, stricter restrictions and the shifting administrative structure. It makes the business affiliation’s consistence with legal standards more tangled and irksome.

Greenpeace is expected to recognize threats in the present moment and long-haul implications through the Greenpeace SWOT Examination. Risks with brief repercussions ought to be addressed on fundamental reasons to avoid any possible underhandedness(Greenpeace. (2018).


Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.


Also, you can place the order at /

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!



The Post Greenpeace Swot Analysis first appeared on PHD Writers US and is written by admin

Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.