HCS 335 Week 1 Health Care Ethics Matching Exercise

HCS 335 Week 1 Health Care Ethics Matching Exercise Recent

HCS 335 Week 1 Health Care Ethics Matching Exercise

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Instructions

Complete the Health Care Ethics Matching Exercise.
Match keywords commonly used in health care ethics to the definitions on the page. Discuss the exercise in class and turn in your answer sheet to your facilitator.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: HCS 335 Week 1 Health Care Ethics Matching Exercise

In recent times, developments in medical practice have made it possible for practitioners to prolong human life, even sometimes beyond the natural limits, a situation that involves various end-of-life ethical dilemmas (Russell et al., 2019). Brain death, for example, entails several ethical and legal controversies. Under such a situation, one’s brain may be dead or no longer functional. However, their heartbeat may still be functioning, leading to misunderstanding. The purpose of this paper is to discuss ethical, legal, and professional codes and aspects concerning Tonya Archer’s case.

Ethical Principles and Moral Theory & End-of-Life Issues

The case study of the 15-year-old Tonya Archer involves the unfortunate results of cardiac arrest leading to the death of her brain as a result of surgical complications. The end-of-life issues in this case implore the providers to consider the effects of the decisions that the parents have to make in relation to their daughter’s situation (Capella University, 2020). The parents face difficult ethical and even legal dilemmas concerning the kind of decisions that they will take based on the recommendations of the healthcare team of removing Tonya from the ventilator because of limited or no hope for recovery.

As such, ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence are essential in this case (Lamb, 2020). Furthermore, Kantian moral theory applies to the case. Autonomy means that the parents have a right to make decisions concerning the treatment interventions for Tonya, and that includes their suggestions that she should be on life support since her heart is still beating despite the brain death.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCS 335 Week 1 Health Care Ethics Matching Exercise

The medical team had a duty of care to offer the best intervention to Tonya to attain best outcomes. While the intended outcome would have led to Tonya’s recovery from surgery, the team now faces an ethical dilemma of telling the parents the truth about the grim results based on evidence from the procedure. The parents suggest having Tonya on life support but the team understands that her brain is dead.

As such, the team must respect the autonomy of the parents and be honest by telling them the truth about the outcome. Kant’s moral theory; especially the categorical imperative, aligns with the case study as the providers did all they possibly could to save her life during the surgical process (Shepherd et al., 2019). Imperatively, the providers may not agree with the parents but have an ethical duty to respect their autonomy and act with the best maxims.

Professional Codes of Ethics

The National Association for Healthcare Quality (2023) implores healthcare professionals to adhere to their professional duties and ethical expectations as well as principles. The professional ethical principles that support my perspective advance that providers should advocate processes that reduce harm to all people, promote interventions that are holistic based on patient’s circumstances, and use scientific evidence developed within the established quality models.

The healthcare team in this case established these measures and show how they value Tonya’s life during the process. For instance, they performed immediate resuscitation and placed her on life support immediately. They also used science-based evidence to demonstrate the current brain function after the complication.

Mission statement and Values

My current healthcare organization’s vision and mission statement focus on the ACE’s values. The facility’s mission is to give a positive approach to care and be inclusive in all activities to make a difference in its patient population. These values reinforce my decision to provide compassion, advice, education and offer medically-relevant trajectory like dealing with patients in outpatient settings who can attain benefits based on ethical and moral expectations and professional conduct.

For instance, demonstrating a commitment to exceeding expectation and being enthusiastic in all activities we undertake (Russell et al., 2019). In this case, the facility should integrate grieving services to offer emotional support and guidance to families in processing and understanding such situations. If the family wishes to maintain Tonya’s life, the care team needs to respect the autonomy and can offer support like having skilled nursing or palliative care at home.

Accrediting Bodies

Accrediting entities like The Joint Commission have a mission that aims at continuous improvement of healthcare for the public while collaborating with other stakeholders and evaluating health care organizations as well as inspiring them to succeed in provision of safe and effective care of the highest quality and value.

Based on my perspective, the facility implements these requirements. Again, the case study demonstrates that the facility focuses on offering best care to attain better outcomes. The facility also respected the parents’ perspective. As such, the solution aligns with the TJC’s requirements since it implores on the providers to respect ethical expectations and parents’ wishes.

Conclusion

Healthcare providers should be patient and empathetic to patients and their families in end-of-life situations, especially when such circumstances happen due to surgical processes’ complications. They should also practice ethical principle and apply moral theories to support patients and their families. Tonya’s case shows that patients have autonomy and providers should respect their decisions, even when they are not based on scientific evidence.

References

Capella University (2020). Case Study: Tonya Archer.

Lamb, D. (2020). Death, brain death and ethics. Routledge.

National Association for Healthcare Quality (NAHQ (2023). Code of Ethics.

https://nahq.org/about-nahq/code-of-ethics

Russell, J. A., Epstein, L. G., Greer, D. M., Kirschen, M., Rubin, M. A., & Lewis, A. (2019).

Brain death, the determination of brain death, and member guidance for brain death accommodation requests: AAN position statement. Neurology, 92(5), 228-232.

DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006750

Shepherd, S. M., Willis-Esqueda, C., Newton, D., Sivasubramaniam, D., & Paradies, Y. (2019).

The challenge of cultural competence in the workplace: Perspectives of healthcare providers. BMC health services research, 19(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3959-7