How to write NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 — step-by-step

Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Note:  All our papers are written from scratch by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.

Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.

See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.

Get Plagiarism Report Humanize My Essay

How to write NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 — step-by-step

Here’s a practical, ready-to-follow step-by-step plan you can use to produce a high-quality, evidence-based NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 paper. Each step includes quick how-to actions, examples you can copy, and small templates so you can get started immediately.

---

Step 1 — Choose a focused, researchable clinical issue

• Action: pick a narrow, current, clinically relevant problem (patient safety, med-safety, falls prevention, discharge education, readmissions, etc.).

• Tip: choose something with measurable outcomes and enough recent literature (last 5 years).

• Example topics:

  • “Does hourly rounding reduce inpatient falls in adult medical-surgical units?”

  • “Does teach-back improve medication adherence in older adults with chronic disease?”

---

Step 2 — Turn the topic into a PICO(T) question

• Action: frame a PICO(T) to focus your search and arguments.

• PICO(T) template:
  P = Population, I = Intervention, C = Comparison, O = Outcome, (T = Time)

• Example:
  P: hospitalized adult medical-surgical patients
  I: hourly nursing rounding
  C: usual care (no structured rounding)
  O: reduction in patient falls
  T: within 3 months

• Write it out: “In hospitalized adult medical-surgical patients (P), does hourly nursing rounding (I) compared with usual care (C) reduce patient falls (O) within 3 months (T)?”

---

Step 3 — Build and run a focused literature search

• Databases to use: CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ProQuest (and Google Scholar for breadth).

• Filters: peer-reviewed, last 5 years (unless seminal older study), English, human.

• Search string examples (adjust terms for your topic):
  ("patient falls" OR "fall prevention") AND ("hourly rounding" OR "nursing rounding") AND ("randomized" OR "trial" OR "quasi-experimental")

• Actionable tips:

  • Use Boolean operators (AND/OR), quotation marks for phrases, and parentheses.

  • Save search results and export citations (RIS/EndNote/Mendeley/Zotero).

  • Look for 1–2 systematic reviews + 2–4 primary studies (RCTs, quasi-experimental, cohort).

---

Step 4 — Select appropriate sources (quality over quantity)

• Aim: 4–6 high-quality, peer-reviewed sources (mix of systematic review(s) and primary research).

• Prioritize: Systematic reviews/meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, high-quality cohort or quasi-experimental studies.

• Quick inclusion/exclusion criteria example:

  • Include: studies on adults, inpatient setting, outcomes include falls, published ≤5 years.

  • Exclude: pediatric settings, case reports, opinion pieces.

---

Step 5 — Critically appraise each selected study

• Use a mini appraisal template for each article:

  1. Citation (APA)

  2. Study type/design (SR, RCT, cohort)

  3. Aim / research question

  4. Sample & setting (size, inclusion/exclusion)

  5. Methods / intervention details

  6. Key outcomes & results (effect sizes, p-values if given)

  7. Strengths / limitations / bias risk

  8. Level of evidence (note commonly used hierarchy)

  9. Applicability to your practice setting

• Example appraisal questions (CASP style): Were participants randomized? Was allocation concealed? Were outcomes measured reliably? Are results clinically significant?

---

Step 6 — Synthesize the evidence (don’t just summarize)

• Action: create an evidence matrix/table comparing studies across core items (design, sample, intervention, outcomes, quality).

• Example matrix (text version):

• Synthesis sentence example:
  “Across two RCTs and one systematic review, structured hourly rounding was associated with a consistent reduction in patient falls (range 20–30%), with the strongest evidence coming from randomized trials conducted in adult medical-surgical settings.”

---

Step 7 — Translate evidence into practice (implementation plan)

• Components to include:

  • Recommendation: concise evidence-based change (e.g., implement hourly rounding protocol).

  • Rationale: link to the strongest evidence and expected patient outcomes.

  • Implementation steps: staff training, pilot unit, monitoring plan, documentation changes.

  • Barriers & facilitators: staffing, time, leadership support, EHR prompts.

  • Outcome measures (SMART): e.g., “Reduce falls by 25% in pilot unit within 3 months; measure pre/post fall rates.”

• Example SMART objective: “By 12 weeks after implementation, fall rate will decrease by 25% compared to baseline (measured per 1,000 patient-days).”

---

Step 8 — Write the paper: suggested structure & word allocation

If instructor doesn’t specify length, aim ~1,500–2,000 words. Example structure:

1. Title page (APA 7)

2. Abstract (150–250 words) — concise summary of problem, methods, key findings, recommendation.

3. Introduction (200–300 words) — define issue, significance, PICO question.

4. Evidence Review (600–800 words) — describe and compare your 4–6 sources.

5. Critical Evaluation (300–400 words) — quality assessment and synthesis of evidence strength.

6. Application to Practice / Implementation Plan (350–500 words) — recommendation, outcomes, barriers, evaluation.

7. Conclusion (100–150 words) — restate importance and call to action.

8. References (APA 7) — only cite sources used.

---

Step 9 — APA 7 & writing essentials (common formatting items)

• Use APA 7th edition: title page, running head not required for student papers unless instructor specifies, 12-pt Times New Roman (or instructor preference), double spacing, 1-inch margins.

• In-text citation examples:

  • One author: (Smith, 2022)

  • Two authors: (Smith & Lee, 2021)

  • Three or more: (Smith et al., 2020)

• Example journal reference (APA 7):
  Smith, A. B., & Lee, C. D. (2022). Effect of hourly rounding on inpatient falls: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 37(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/xx.xxxx/xxxxx

• Use a citation manager (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) to avoid reference errors.

---

Step 10 — Final revision, proofreading & submission checklist

• Content checks:

  • Does every paragraph tie to the PICO question or implementation plan?

  • Are study limitations acknowledged and weighed in recommendations?

  • Is evidence synthesis (comparison and integration) present — not just summaries?

• Formatting checks:

  • APA headings (Level 1, 2 as needed), in-text citations match reference list, tables labeled/numbered.

• Proofreading:

  • Read aloud, check transitions, fix passive/wordy sentences.

  • Use a spelling/grammar checker (Grammarly or built-in), then manual review.

• Academic integrity:

  • Ensure paraphrases are in your words; quote minimally; run a similarity check if available.

• Submission:

  • Confirm file format & filename per rubric, include any required cover sheets, submit to the correct dropbox or portal.

---

Quick starter checklist (copy this into your working file)

• PICO(T) written and included in intro

• 4–6 peer-reviewed sources saved & cited (≥1 systematic review if available)

• Appraisal notes for each article completed

• Evidence matrix/table created and referenced in the paper

• Clear implementation plan with SMART outcomes

• APA 7 formatted title page, citations, reference list

• Proofread and plagiarism check completed