Impact of Patient Preferences on Treatment Outcomes

Impact of Patient Preferences on Treatment Outcomes

Instructions

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Impact of Patient Preferences on Treatment Outcomes

DISCUSSION: PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

Changes in culture and technology have resulted in patient populations that are often well informed and educated, even before consulting or considering a healthcare need delivered by a health professional. Fueled by this, health professionals are increasingly involving patients in treatment decisions. However, this often comes with challenges, as illnesses and treatments can become complex.

What has your experience been with patient involvement in treatment or healthcare decisions?

In this Discussion, you will share your experiences and consider the impact of patient involvement (or lack of involvement). You will also consider the use of a patient decision aid to inform best practices for patient care and healthcare decision making.

RESOURCES

• Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014).  The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision makingLinks to an external site. .  Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(13), 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186
• Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016).  Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statementLinks to an external site. .  Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396
• Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016).  Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practiceLinks to an external site. .  Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483
• Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014).  Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision makingLinks to an external site. .  Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.xThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019).  Patient decision aidsLinks to an external site. . Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.
• Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s Decision Aids Inventory at  https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/Links to an external site. .
• Choose “For Specific Conditions,” then  Browsean alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic.
• After you have chosen a topic (or condition) and a decision aid, consider if  social determinants of healthLinks to an external site. were considered in the treatment plan Social determinants of health can affect a patient’s decision as these are conditions in the patient’s environment, such as economic stability, education access, health care access and quality, neighborhood, and social and community context.
• NOTE: To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please  DO NOT use the patient’s real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice.

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 11

Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences,  social determinants of healthLinks to an external site. , and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how including patient preferences, social determinants of health, and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.

( Please Note: The underlined “social determinants of health” in the above content is meant to hotlink to the following Walden webpage and content:

Social Determinants of Health – Social Determinants of Health – Academic Guides at Walden Links to an external site. University)

Respond to at least  two of your colleagues  on two different days and offer alternative views on the impact of patient preferences on treatment plans or outcomes, or the potential impact of patient decision aids on situations like the one shared.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!