Innovative Technology Implementation In Healthcare: Evaluation And Impact Analysis solution

Innovative Technology Implementation In Healthcare: Evaluation And Impact Analysis

Instructions

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Innovative Technology Implementation In Healthcare: Evaluation And Impact Analysis

Instructions

It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to address the initial discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s), you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion or initial discussion is late, you will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above.

Initial Response

Instructions:

The student will identify a topic from the provided list OR choose an instructor-approved topic of their choosing related to maternity care.

Infographic

The student will develop a one-page education sheet that condenses the background and of the topic into an easy to read infographic.  The student should utilize visual aids and be as creative as the student chooses to be with design.  This infographic must be uploaded as a PDF and be shared with the class via a discussion post.  Additionally, the student must review and comment on at least 2 other student’s infographics.

Possible topics

• Ethical, legal, cultural, and/or nursing practice dilemma
• Drug usage in pregnancy and breastfeeding
• Refusal of care (for self or child in cases of emergency or impending death)
• Cultural birth/breastfeeding practices (identify culture)
• maternal & and infant morbidity/mortality
• Reproductive justice
• State vs. federal laws in regard to abortion/adoption/surrogacy/assistive reproductive technology
• Evidence-based practice
• LGBTQIA+ discrimination/disparity/erasure in reproductive health care settings, aspects of LGBTQ pregnancy, the impact of hormone replacement therapy on fertility, LGBTQ-specific competency, and sensitivity training
• Specific health problem (heart condition, autoimmune disorder, thrombophilia, disability, pregnancies affected by genetic conditions incompatible with life, Preeclampsia, Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, RTIs)
• Epidural use, various alternative pain relief measures in labor
• Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative

In addition:

• Choose an article that identifies a practice change or quality improvement project and research that recommends change
• If you have another topic, you are passionate about not found on this list, please reach out to the faculty for approval.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Peer Response

Instructions:

Please read and respond to at least two of your peers’ initial postings. You may want to consider the following questions in your responses to your peers:

Compare and contrast your initial posting with those of your peers.  How are they similar or how are they different? What information can you add that would help support the responses of your peers? Ask your peers a question for clarification about their posts. What most interests you about their responses?

Innovative Technology Implementation In Healthcare: Evaluation And Impact Analysis solution

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!