Module4InstructionModule4PostobservationConferencewithCooperatingTeacher

Module4InstructionModule4PostobservationConferencewithCooperatingTeacher

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Instructions

Module4InstructionModule4PostobservationConferencewithCooperatingTeacher

Module 4: Post-observation Conference with Cooperating Teacher (PoP Cycle 1)

1. Share your self-evaluation  (JUST DOMAIN 3)using  Touro Rubric with evidence Download Touro Rubric with evidence from your lesson you taught
2. Ask the cooperating teacher to provide specific feedback based on his or her observations in relation to Domain 3

During this meeting you will discuss the following:

• Identify your self-selected glow/reinforcementarea (using the lens of the HLP/Danielson domain)
• Justify the glow/reinforcementselection with evidence
• Identify your self-selected grow/refinement area
• Justify the grow/refinementselection with evidence
• Name actionable next steps to improve the grow/refinement and:
• How this will positively impact student achievement
• How this will support other evaluation instrument areas
• Identify actionable next-steps for sustaining performance
• Identify actionable next-steps for improving performance

EXAMPLE:

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!