MT 140 M5 Assignment Ethics in Management

• MT 140 M5 Assignment Ethics in Management.

Ethics in Management

CSR has become a fundamental piece of current business strategy, requiring organizations to be financially, socially, and environmentally capable. Businesses should contribute to society’s past shareholder earnings in a quickly changing worldwide landscape. CSR includes monetary, legal, ethical, and magnanimous obligations, each of which assists corporations with benefitting society (Laia et al., 2022).

Paper Town is a small town in South Carolina where most of its inhabitants work at the local paper processing plant. The manufacturing line has emitted harmful fumes, causing health problems for members of the public at large for far too long. Although change is warranted, the townspeople have disregarded federal and state efforts to end the processing plant because they fear losing their most significant source of commerce.

Businesses should accommodate financial targets with social and environmental obligations, which presents ethical and CSR challenges. This paper plans to examine CSR and ethics in Paper Town’s strategy, including overlooked CSR pillars, ethical issues, and the significance of implementing them. It will likewise contrast the organization’s ethical reasoning with a picked ethical approach and recommend strategies to address CSR and ethical difficulties through an integrity-based or compliance-based ethics program.

CSR Pillars Neglected by Paper Town

• Four Pillars of CSR

CSR has four pillars: financial, legal, ethical, and philanthropic. The businesses can follow these pillars, which help the shareholders, employees, shoppers, and community. Vo et al. (2022) According to these, Paper Town has ignored all these vital pillars, which resulted in extreme damage to the community and climate.

Ethical Responsibility

Paper Town has breached its community morals. The production line remained running while toxic vapour injured current and former employees and the surrounding towns. This shows that it leans towards profit over people. Businesses should operate with ethics and in the interest of all stakeholders (Kim et al., 2023). In this regard, Paper Town has failed corporate social responsibility by failing to address its health hazards.

Legal Responsibility

Despite the ethical shortcomings, Paper Town has probably breached its legal responsibilities, as environmental standards protect human populations and ecosystems from industrial pollution. The factory emits constant air pollution, which indicates its failure to meet such requirements. Legal responsiveness in CSR involves meeting the standards and regulations governing a business’s operations (Kong et al., 2022).

The pollution in Paper Town exposes the company to legal consequences but also encompasses a broader failure of corporate citizenship and environmental stewardship.

Philanthropic Responsibility

Beyond what the law requires, social responsibility is the intentional commitment companies make to the government assistance of the community (Van Der Waldt et al., 2023). Paper Town needs to heed this CSR support theme because it doesn’t reach out to the community for awareness, invest in contamination-reducing advances, or mitigate its ecological effect. A respectable business would contribute to the community if its activities harmed it (Van Der Waldt et al., 2023).

Examples of Neglect

1. The absence of ethical responsibility in the organization’s failure to address unsafe exhausts despite the health risks to employees and the community is self-evident.

2. In a shareholder model, somewhat lower compensations exploit labourers and show a slight interest in their financial well-being.

3. The industrial facility’s lack of philanthropic endeavours to better the community or lessen its environmental effect shows its disdain for social responsibility (Van Der Waldt et al., 2023).

Ethical Concerns in Paper Town

Business ethics are the right things to do, even if they aren’t profitable” (Holzberg, 2023). The plant operation in Paper Town has developed ethical concerns and caused harm to the area and the environment. An organization should rectify these concerns and return to ethical business practices.

Health and Safety

The health and safety of the factory labourers and the community of Paper Town are among the significant ethical concerns discussed in MT 140 M5 Assignment Ethics in Management. Hazardous factory exhaust has caused respiratory problems for retirees and current employees.

Therefore, the organization shows little concern for the safety of its workers. According to Hollstein & Rosa, 2023, MT 140 M5 Assignment Ethics in Management, ethically, every business must ensure a safe environment for the workers and take care of them. Paper Town should have done that and failed to meet the ethical criteria.

Environmental Deterioration

Another huge moral issue is what Paper Town’s exercises mean for the climate. The manufacturing plant’s air contamination seriously pollutes nearby networks and degrades the environment. Businesses should lessen their environmental impact and capability sustainably for people in the future (Islam et al., 2022). Paper Town’s disdain for the climate is unethical and unsustainable because it jeopardizes the locale’s health.

Community Exploitation

Paper Town exploits the community’s dependence on the production line for jobs by paying minimal wage rates more than it needs to; it knows the workers have no alternative. It is not ethical to take advantage of shortcomings in the community. A truly ethical company would empower the community by offering decent wages and contributing to neighbourhood development, not just leveraging its power for its benefit (Krasna et al., 2024).

CSR Concerns in Paper Town

• Lack of CSR Policy

Paper Town’s lack of a CSR policy indicates vast CSR issues. Since it doesn’t have a CSR system, the organization must have the guiding principles to ensure it works socially and environmentally. To satisfy current CSR guidelines, the organization needs to fix a few issues brought about by its lack of heading (Van Der Waldt et al., 2023).

Lack of CSR Policy

Paper Town’s most excellent CSR issue is the need for more policy. A policy that will guide the corporation to consider all its partners, not only the shareholders, would be a holistic CSR policy that would discuss environmental effects, work for employee government assistance, and community improvement (Shubita et al., 2022). The absence of a valid CSR policy would mean the company still needs to grasp the role of CSR in its strategy.

Prioritize Shareholder Profits

The CSR issue of Paper Town focuses only on the shareholder’s value and neglects the other stakeholders. This has resulted in community-harming behaviours, such as persisting with the operation of the industrial plant regardless of health and environmental hazards. In a sustainability-placed organization, a stakeholder model is employed where all people affected by an organization are considered (Gennari, 2022). Such a shift of focus will likely enhance the CSR at Paper Town.

Subverting Community Well-being

The industrial facility’s activities negatively impacted the community’s economy and the general public. It utilizes individuals yet presents health and environmental dangers to the community. This compromise needs to be healthier for sustaining networks. A decent CSR program ought to demonstrate a condition wherein the processing plant gains and the community gains, too (Gennari, 2022).

Purpose of Instituting CSR and Ethics at Paper Town

Paper Town’s CSR and ethics try to create a good business model for each partner rather than just legislatively or increase the organization’s reputation. According to Gennari, in 2022, Paper Town can achieve any of these goals by adopting CSR and ethical standards.

Rebuilding Trust

CSR and ethics are being executed at Paper Town since one of the main objectives is to regain the community’s trust. The production line has negatively impacted local people, thus leading to a deterioration of individuals’ trust in the corporation. A decent CSR program, which minimizes contamination and improves the working circumstances and the organization’s investment in the community, can successfully accommodate this relationship and reconstruct the organization’s picture (Hollstein & Rosa, 2023).

Ensuring Sustainability

Paper Town should engage in eco-friendly business activities that reduce emissions and environmental impacts; this is also a suggestion presented in MT 140 M5 Assignment Ethics in Management. According to Hockerts & Searcy (2023), green business activities protect the climatic condition, reduce legal complications, and promote the business reputation among workers and the general public.

By developing a sustainability-focused CSR strategy, the company can align its operations in Paper Town with environmental protection and resource conservation, which is part of MT 140 M5 Assignment Ethics in Management.

Improving Employee Well-being

Fair compensation, improved working circumstances, and health and safety are essential to a thorough CSR policy. When employee government assistance is upgraded, Paper Town can guarantee high confidence, low turnover, and further efficiency development. Esteemed and focused employees are more dedicated to the organization’s purpose (Mung et al., 2023).

Regulation Compliance

Adherence to ethical methods and a sound CSR policy guarantee that Paper Town consents to the set regulations and minimizes punishments. Adhering to environmental and work standards can minimize legal dangers, and the organization’s compliance with the prerequisites can be demonstrated (Mung et al., 2023).

Preferable Ethical Reasoning

Paper Town and the community apply utilitarian ethics; they believe the paper plant helps many people. Unfortunately, this approach ignores the processing plant’s long-term damage to the town and violates the partners’ privileges and welfare. Deontology, emphasizing duty and deep quality, is superior to that (Koehn, 2023).

Existing Ethical Reasoning

The ongoing collective ethic is utilitarianism; subsequently, the manufacturing plant’s harmful activities are legitimate because they give the majority of the town’s population work. This approach is sensible in the short run, yet it does not consider the effect of production line contamination on the community’s health and the climate in the long run (Koehn, 2023). It likewise neglects to regard the ethical responsibility of upholding all individuals’ freedoms and government assistance.

Preferred Ethical Approach

Paper Town ought to have a deontological approach based on good and evil. This strategy centres around moral principles, such as preserving human existence and the climate, regardless of profits. Paper Town can change from the dominant profit improvement strategy to the principle of ethical corporate leadership, where the organization and its partners can benefit from a deontological approach (Koehn, 2023).

Addressing CSR and Ethical Issues

Paper Town could utilize an integrity—or compliance-based ethics program to handle its CSR and ethical difficulties. The corporation could realign its operations with ethical and CSR standards through these programs.

Integrity-Based Ethics Program

An integrity-based ethics program would energize compliance with deference forever, environmental responsibility, and value in the organization. Such a program would educate the staff about the ethical approach to making choices, define the standards of conduct, and increase responsibility (Araceli et al., 2023). Ethical business choices can be guaranteed at Paper Town by promoting esteem-based direction.

Compliance-Based Ethics Program

A compliance-based ethics program would ensure compliance with every regulation as intently as possible, ensuring that Paper Town conforms to all the work and environmental regulations (Bateman et al., 2022). This includes tracking, reviewing, and implementing apparatuses that guarantee the organization agrees with the law under this program. Compliance-based programs are more rule-situated, yet they pass on no question about eliminating indecent lead and diminishing legal openness (Araceli et al., 2023).

Predicting Change through Ethics Programs

The ethical and CSR challenges that Paper Town can face can be addressed by implementing an integrity- or compliance-based ethics program. An integrity-based program would zero in on such qualities as environmentalism, regard forever, and reasonableness to improve ethical practices in the organization. It is likely to change the worldview from basically making profits to building worth and health for every one of the partners simultaneously, which will upgrade responsibility and respectable dynamics at every organizational level (Hockerts & Searcy, 2023).

• Compliance vs. Integrity Programs

On the other hand, a compliance-based program would establish the principles that guarantee compliance with laws and regulations, organize individuals participating in a program, and refuse offenders.

Through this, an organization may achieve higher compliance with environmental and workplace decisions and rules, which may help avoid penalties and attain public confidence (Laia et al., 2022). While compliance is worthwhile to ensure the rules are maintained with exactness, it may lead to a different level of ethical ownership compared with an integrity-based program.

Ethical Reasoning and Purpose of the Proposed Program

Under the deontological theory, the intention of establishing the integrity-based ethics program at Paper Tory tends to advocate for values meant to sustain human life, preserve the environment, and pragmatically handle employees and other partners irrespective of the outcomes of such practice on the organization’s income stream. This program shall shift from shareholder orientation to partner focus to enhance sustainability, network relationships, and reputation.

On the other hand, a utilitarianism-based compliance-oriented program focuses on the highest good through adherence to legal requirements, primarily for the avoidance of legal consequences for which unethical actions have been committed, as seen in MT 140 M5 Assignment Ethics in Management, Hockerts & Searcy 2023.

Implementation

Paper Town might require a few steps toward setting up the ethics initiatives. This should be followed by an environmental review to determine the degree of pervasive contamination in the organization and possible areas of improvement. In this way, the corporation should consider investing in advancements that lessen discharges and are cordial to the climate (Islam et al., 2022).

Paper Town should likewise frame a health and safety board that tends to employee issues and guarantees that working environments are protected and liberated from unreasonable practices. To wrap things up, the corporation should be involved in community exercises to get neighbourhood support and demonstrate the implementation of CSR exercises.

Conclusion

Paper Town demonstrates the requirement for CSR and ethical considerations in organizations. The firm has continued to dirty the community and climate and has neglected to act for the well-being of society and ethical standards. In this manner, Paper Town can satisfy the goals of its CSR strategy and ethical program and simultaneously make enhancements that would help all partners. It is, therefore, about shifting from a shareholder to a partner model that will help the community, climate, and firm in the long run.

References

Araceli, Salud Millán-Lara, Sepúlveda, I., & Ruiz-Lozano, M. (2023). Fostering a culture of business ethics: A roadmap for responsible management through codes of ethics based on the experience of Spanish companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(9).

https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-06-2022-0228

Bateman, T. S., Konopaske, R., & Snell, S. (2022). M: Management (7th ed.). McGraw Hill LLC, 2021.

Gennari, F. (2022). The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs. Journal of Management and Governance.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09653-6

Hockerts, K., & Searcy, C. (2023). How to sharpen our discourse on corporate sustainability and business ethics—a view from the section editors. Journal of Business Ethics, 187(2).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05386-0

Hollstein, B., & Rosa, H. (2023). Social acceleration: A challenge for companies? Insights for business ethics from resonance theory. Journal of Business Ethics.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05506-w

Holzberg, B. (2023). Local understandings of decent work and the legitimacy of global labour standards: Insights from garment suppliers in Egypt and Jordan. Journal of Business Ethics.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05490-1

Islam, S. N., Reinstädtler, S., Reza, M. S., Afroze, S., & Azad, A. K. (2022). Climate change versus livelihoods, heritage and ecosystems in small island states of the Pacific: A case study on Tuvalu. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02367-7

Kim, C., Zang, Y., Wang, H., & Niu, K. (2023). When do corporate good deeds become a burden? The role of corporate social responsibility following adverse events. Journal of Business Ethics.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05511-z

Koehn, D. (2023). Narrative business ethics versus narratives within business ethics: Problems and possibilities from an Aristotelian virtue ethics perspective. Journal of Business Ethics.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05399-9

Kong, G., Kong, T. D., Qin, N., & Yu, L. (2022). Ethnic diversity, trust and corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of marketization and language. Journal of Business Ethics, 187.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05236-5

Krasna, H., Venkataraman, M., & Patino, I. (2024). Salary disparities in public health occupations: Analysis of federal data, 2021‒2022. American Journal of Public Health, e1–e11.

https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2023.307512

Laia, Lea, Vrontis, Demetris, Maizza, Amedeo, Fait, Monica, Scorrano, & Poalo. (2022). Business strategy and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Direction, 38(8), 24–26.

https://doi.org/10.1108/sd-07-2022-0065

Mung Khie Tsen, Gu, M.-L., Chee Meng Tan, & See Kwong Goh. (2023). Homeworking and employee job stress and engagement: A multilevel analysis from 34 European countries. Social Indicators Research, 168(1-3), 511–538.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03138-1

Shubita, M., Ahmed, S., & Essel-Paintsil, M. (2022). The economic impact of corporate social responsibility on the development of indigenous communities: Evidence from Ghana’s mining sector. International Journal of Organizational Analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2021-2985

Van Der Waldt, G., Rooi, N., & Botha, D. (2023). Corporate social responsibility 2.0: Towards a socio-transformative paradigm for business. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 12, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v12i4.822

Vo, D. H., Van, L. T. H., Hoang, H. T. T., & Tran, N. P. (2022). The interrelationship between intellectual capital, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal.

https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-06-2021-0238