N599 Week 4 Assignment Education Program for Patients

• N599 Week 4 Assignment Education Program for Patients.

Education Program for Newly Diagnosed Patients

Writing gives a reason to make informed decisions on any research or undertaking by providing an inside-out understanding of the existing information, pointing out the research openings, and informing how moves up to frameworks and interventions can be impacted. A writing overview should, therefore, form the cornerstone in gaining insight into diabetes self-management education and identification of best practices.

Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Researcher using keywords such as “diabetes self-management education,” “newly diagnosed patients,” and “online communities.” Boolean operators, truncation, and channels were used to recover essential writing.

Database Search and Selection

The databases used for the writing review include PubMed, Scopus, and Google Researcher. The selection of these databases relied on thoroughness regarding peer-explored journals, faint writing, and conference proceedings concerning the topic of diabetes self-management education. The main reason these databases were involved is their reputation for being essential wellsprings of insightful information regarding clinical benefits and, more particularly, the management of diabetes.

• Effective Literature Search Strategies

PubMed is known for its gigantic database of biomedical writing, and Scopus inducts the most genuine journals and conference papers. Google Research supplements these databases by permitting a more comprehensive degree of writing, especially for those who are not peer-minded and have faint writing skills.

Kamei et al. (2021) Search terms and keywords included “diabetes self-management education,” “newly diagnosed patients,” “online communities,” and other related terms. Models are Boolean operators that are combined search terms AND, OR, and NOT. Channels were used to restrict the search and bring forward points of view on the sort of publication, language, and study plan.

The search was confined to include only examinations disseminated over the last 10 years and streamed in the English language to ensure the pertinence and quality of the writing recovered (García-Peñalvo, 2022). Studies with pilot plans, strong overviews, and meta-research were picked to emphasize sound research proof.

Overview of Diabetes Self-Management Education

Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an organized, proof-based strategy for dealing with draw-in individuals with diabetes to manage their condition and further empower their everyday flourishing outcomes (Rutledge, 2021). It wraps a level of educational interventions intended to work on patients’ information, cutoff points, and confidence in managing various pieces of their diabetes, including medication adherence, blood glucose monitoring, lifestyle modifications, and coping techniques.

Education forms the core reason for diabetes management by providing a patient with the essential tools and information on well-being-related decision-making. According to Powers et al. (2020), when patients are informed about their disease, complications, and frameworks to care for themselves, DSME enables them to be participatory in a working form within their treatment cycle, which attracts them to search for additional settled-on choices in ordinary presence.

Studies have additionally invariably distinguished that DSME works on patient outcomes. A 2020 scoping concentrate by Andrich and Foronda had the option to show that, indeed, DSME programs made changes in glycemic control, the utilization of well-being administrations, and overhauls in the quality of life of individuals with diabetes. In like manner, this meta-investigation through Carmienke et al. reported that the HbA1c level, self-care behavior, and diabetes-related information further resulted in attending DSME programs.

The sessions should cover incredible nutrition and genuine exercises, the administration of medication, blood glucose monitoring, and trustworthy insight limits pertinent to diabetes care. Commonly applied in the learning framework are a few educational tools open to handouts, sound, and interactive widgets. According to Kumah et al., 2021, DSME programs are given methodically by healthcare professionals, either a clinical caretaker, a dietician, or a diabetes educator.

• Tools Enhancing DSME Accessibility

Programs and Tools for DSME Other than the formally organized educational sessions, the DSME programs are nearly enabled through the responsibility of the companions, bunches-oriented initiatives, the instillation of duties, and the promotion of behavioral change. Online access and multi-use applications become desperate empowering influences of accessing the DSME content in a horde of fashions and enabling ongoing support and correspondence among individuals; therefore, Jain et al., 2020,

In any situation, paying little mind to the spread-out benefits of DSME, a few challenges remain to be tended to for wide adoption and implementation. These programs may not be open in a few topographical regions, which is, for the most part, the situation in under-resourced settings. Low thriving education, language limits, and socioeconomic status add to obstructions for the patients in accessing care through DSME interventions.

Permission to DSME is being refreshed through innovative conveyance models, including telehealth and neighborhood programs. Ongoing research is improving DSME interventions to make these programs more suitable for the needs of various patient populations and to revive adherence to self-management behbehaviorsr a long time.

DSME will, therefore, be pressing to equip persons with diabetes with the cutoff points they expect for their care and, consequently, improve their quality of life. Exceptionally, by supporting informed decisions on patients’ administration help, DSME brings about more at lower well-being costs. Continued investment in DSME programs and research is valid to ensure that all persons with diabetes approach high-scoring education and support for ideal affliction management.

Current Challenges in Diabetes Care

Newly diagnosed diabetic patients are confronted with an awe-inspiring number of challenges to their physical, emotional, and psychological steadiness. By a wide margin, the majority of such challenges often stem from the intricacies of dealing with a chronic condition in their lives and adjusting themselves to the normal life modification principle for reasonable diabetes management.

Psychological and Emotional Challenges

One of the formidable challenges that newly diagnosed diabetic persons face is the psychosomatic consequence of obtaining a conclusion of diabetes. It is expected to feel those standard feelings of refusal, shock, and dread as a change is figured out, offset with the meaning of presence with a chronic infection. The N599 Week 4 Assignment Education Program for Patients addresses these emotional challenges by integrating psychosocial support into its framework.

Research has recognized that newly diagnosed patients could show increased conditions of tension and depression, which, in turn, could unfavorably influence their capacities to adjust to their status (Garrido‐Hernansaiz & Alonso‐Tapia, 2020). Openings in existing diabetes care rehearses feature regions that require attention in addressing the necessities of newly diagnosed individuals.

Most investigations indicate that traditional models of diabetes care spin around clinical management and reject psychosocial approaches to affliction, in this manner not responding to the emotional and practical issues of the patients (Mind et al., 2020). The outcome is that persons can barely stick to their treatment routine and accomplish ideal glycemic control, considering poor thriving outcomes and increased healthcare costs.

Additionally, it is compounded by inequality in permission to care and support administrations open to administer diabetes, contributing to aberrations in success across the assorted population gatherings. The confined receptiveness of diabetes education, suppliers, and secret weapons in like way impacts minority populations disproportionately, along with low-income persons or individuals residing in the province and the underserved section (Kurani et al., 2021).

• Comprehensive Diabetes Support Framework

These challenges require a convoluted framework that responds to all the physical, emotional, and social necessities of the diabetic person. In this line, psychosocial support administrations can be included in the diabetes care offices by providing counseling and amigo mentoring programs to assist them with coping with their examination and encourage robust approaches to dealing with the emotional heaps of diabetes (Litchman et al., 2020).

Furthermore, one of the essential methodologies to guarantee that all approach current genuine factors to deal with their conditions is the promotion of permission for diabetes education and support administrations in underserved communities. Telehealth and certain level well-being interventions guarantee permission to diabetes care and support administrations, by and large around, particularly in remote or cocountrysidereas where induction into traditional clinical benefits might be confined (Al-Badri & Hamdy, 2021).

Newly diagnosed individuals with diabetes face different challenges that influence their physical, emotional, and psychosocial thriving. These require a sweeping method that will integrate psychosocial support administrations, relax permission to diabetes education and support benefits, and respond to contrasts in healthcare. With its response to these challenges, more than likely, healthcare suppliers could support patients with diabetes in the genuine management of their condition and improvement in customary quality of life.

Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education Programs

Self-management education programs have been explored for their effectiveness in improving various diabetes management-related outcomes. Indeed, a couple of examinations found that DSME improves glycemic control, quality of life, and patient satisfaction.

Glycemic Control

A couple of professional overviews and meta-examinations have correspondingly reported huge upgrades in glycemic control among patients who participated in DSME programs. For instance, in 2023, the meta-examination conducted by Lai et al.

It is recommended that DSME programs, similar to those proposed in the education program for patients in N599 Week 4 Undertaking, accomplish enormous reductions in HbA1c levels, reflecting shockingly better long-term glycemic control (Lai et al., 2023). A precise survey by Kumah Abuosi et al., 2019, showed short—and long-term updates in glycemic control after DSME interventions (Kumah, Abuos et al., 2021).

Quality of Life

Similar to that, DSME programs have been found to essentially impact the quality of life of individuals who have diabetes. Much research has pointed out that obligation to DSME programs is connected with essential influences in a couple of viewpoints, including functional success and psychological thriving, which include changes associated with social functioning. A randomized controlled pilot by Davidson et al., 2022, saw restores in the quality of life for the beneficiaries of DSME when contrasted with the nonrecipients.

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction with DSME programs is a critical measure of examination results. Research consistently indicates raised satisfaction levels among individuals participating in DSME programs, with many reporting positive encounters and benefits (Siminerio et al., 2023). A concentrate by Coningsby et al. (2022) found that individuals concentrated on DSME programs exceptionally regarding accommodation and importance, mostly indicating that these programs address the issues and expectations of individuals with diabetes (Coningsby et al., 2022).

Factors Contributing to Success or Failure

Different factors have been noted to contribute to the successful or unsuccessful DSME. One of the main issues is the conveyance format of the program, where it has been recorded that an interactive, wrap-based intervention is more valuable than a careful point of view that breathtakingly lights the individual. A multidisciplinary healthcare pack consists of nurses, dietitians, and diabetes educators who, beforehand, were connected with more outcomes since they were seen as thorough and patient-focused.

Nonetheless, success and effectiveness are still unfalteringly connected with the specific content and construction of some random DSME program. Programs tailored individually, considering the patient’s necessities and priorities, ought to be socially delicate, emphasizing commonsense-commonsense, functionally applied practice. Moreover, this cycle requires satisfactory improvement for behavioral and long-run outcomes.

• Overcoming DSME Implementation Barriers

Hindrances to implementing DSME programs include but are not confined to, limited permission to access resources, non-participation in clinical care provider training, and low patient responsibility. A perplexing method should revolve around healthcare providers, policymakers, and the neighborhood opening DSME programs that are socially reasonable and long-term sustainable.

In summary, DSME programs have improved glycemic control, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in individuals with diabetes. The successful components of DSME programs are conveyance format, multidisciplinary involvement, program content, and ongoing support. Challenges in implementing DSME programs ought to be addressed to expand the impact of these interventions on progress in outcomes in individuals with diabetes.

Role of Online Communities in Diabetes Management

Online communities and support networks are also essential for managing diabetes, as they work with the search for, derivation of, and induction to various forms of resources and emotional support for persons with diabetes. Such virtual platforms work on fitting interaction, sharing information, and offering support that attracts individuals to improve their conditions and further energize flourishing outcomes.

Benefits of Online Communities

Different examinations in their work esteem incorporated the benefits of online communities for diabetic patients in that they give a feeling of belonging and being essential to a neighborhood, challenges, and success can be conferred to others who understand what’s genuinely dealing with such an excursion. Research has had the option to spread how responsibility in online communities diminishes feelings of isolation and shame among individuals living with diabetes (Basinger et al., 2019).

Moreover, such forums give space where an individual can portray pressing matters, demand appeal, and get support from another neighbourneighborhoodChallenges of Online Communities. While there are numerous benefits to using online communities, individuals with diabetes may face various challenges in these spaces. One major issue is the inconsistency of information across platforms. Not all content shared by peers is evidence-based or medically accurate, leading to confusion for users.

Additionally, anonymity in online interactions can result in brief engagement and, at times, harmful behaviors like trolling, which can cause emotional distress. The N599 Week 4 Assignment Education Program for Patients emphasizes the importance of reliable, evidence-based resources to address these challenges and ensure a supportive, accurate learning environment (Chan et al., 2022).

Impact on Diabetes Self-Care Behaviors and Outcomes

Different examinations have examined and discovered how online support affects self-care behaviors and behaviors in diabetic patients. The postponed consequences of these examinations show that online interaction moves remixes in medication adherence, food decisions, proactive undertakings, and glycemic control. An overview study by Carmienke et al., 2021, understood that online individuals from diabetes networks recorded higher scores of self-believability in managing their disorder than individuals who were not online and at a more prominent likelihood of practicing sepracticinghaviour contrasted with non-individuals.

Online resources are reported to strongly influence an individual’s determination and self-abundancy for diabetes control. By networking standards with others who experience and offer comparable targets, individuals feel asked and called to do ‘revolutionary’ refreshes to oversee regular presence and stick to supportive frameworks. This feeling of neighborhood responsibility enables the collaborative method for dealing with diabetes management, attracting individuals to recognize command over their well-being and thriving (Chidera et al., 2024).

• Internet’s Role in Diabetes

Social interaction on the Internet results from dissatisfaction with a traditional support system, and the general impression is that social connectivity, communities, and networks will, in turn, be urgent in managing diabetes through information-seeking resource mobilization and emotional care. In addition to the average gains of these tools in managing patients with diabetes, hindrances should be considered in providing abundance and security.

This will, in turn, work with the contact between strong internet communities of healthcare providers and patients to provide support and education to individuals living with diabetes, which is an energetically anticipated factor in improving self-management and well-being outcomes.

Interdisciplinary Approaches to Diabetes Care

Complete management of diabetes and sound care through interdisciplinary collaboration with the patient. The Diabetes Interdisciplinary Perspective incorporates collaboration amongst various disciplines of well-being professionals for the sharp ampleness of every partner on the confounded necessities and updates in the flourishing deferred consequence of the patients.

Importance of Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Diabetes is a complex chronic infection. For that alone, it requires broadness in its strategy towards its management itself. The interdisciplinary collaboration confirms that all pieces of care are, with everything considered, managing the patients’ clinical necessities and psychosocial, behavioral, and nutritional points of view. Having summoned various points of view, each with limitations, may allow an interdisciplinary conference to make person-express care plans address each issue or decision of the patients (Khan & Iqbal, 2023).

The interdisciplinary collaboration has also made this care coordination and continuity commensurate across well-being settings and suppliers. Indeed, multidisciplinary meetings can guarantee consistent and firm care is conveyed to the patients in their diabetes interactions through increased communication and information sharing among the accessories. This collaborative framework diverts the openings in care and clinical errors and similarly works on patient satisfaction, as indicated by Nguyen et al., 2021.

Role of Healthcare Professionals in Diabetes Management

Such care would involve the exceptional roles of nurses, dieticians, and pharmacists, among others. All these have significant roles in the care of individuals with diabetes, and they do so at extraordinary cut-off points.

Nurses

With this, since most healthcare organizations consider nurses to be the fundamental point of contact for diabetes management, they have a functioning participation role in education, support, and clinical care, as well as in educating patients on self-management limits and medication conveyance. Monitoring blood glucose and management care in and out of most healthcare settings will also be so profound with their involvement, according to Kolb, 2021.

Dietitians

Dietitians invest a ton of energy in nutrition therapy; like this, they expect a significant part in the N599 Week 4 Errand Education Program for Patients, helping patients with diabetes to settle on informed food decisions that will assist them with maintaining the disorder. They will give personalized dinner plans, teach sugar counting and portion control, and instruct on dietary modifications to improve glycemic control (Griauzde et al., 2022).

Pharmacists

Diabetes management would be incomplete without the mediating roles of pharmacists, who oversee diabetes medication and give counseling to individuals with diabetes. They assist patients with comprehending their medicines, including the degree to which they aggregate, how they are to be taken, and possible outcomes. Pharmacists work with other healthcare suppliers to endorse medication plans and increase consistency (Monzón-Kenneke et al., 2021).

Collaborative Care Models

Different collaborative care models support cross-section work for various disciplines within clinical benefits management; among them are the Chronic Care Model and the Gathering-Based Care Model, to mention a couple. These form the foundation for the ensuing model, which shows restraint drove and incorporates patient responsibility and inter-professional collaboration: Timpel et al., 2020

Proof from studies indicates that collaborative care models bring about superior patient outcomes, including improved glycemic control, a reduction in the utilization of clinical benefits, and a reshaping of quality of life (Ali et al., 2020). These models engage teamwork, communication, and shared decision-making processes; thus, the expectation for a functioning role on the piece of patients is made while giving expansive, coordinated, proof-based care.

In other words, it is imperative to involve specialists to provide care for diabetic people. Interdisciplinary approaches to the care of people with diabetes go quite fine and dandy to ensure good patient outcomes; updating the quality of general diabetes management by making sure the willingness of nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and other health care providers will work. It works with communication, coordination, and teamwork among healthcare suppliers so that patients get integrated care that matches their stimulating necessities and inclinations.

Conclusion

The audit of related writing has given extraordinary insights regarding the impact of interdisciplinary collaboration, online communities, and diabetes self-management education programs on the diabetes care process. One of the outcomes is the successful findings of DSME programs on glycemic control in individual patients, their quality of life, and patient satisfaction, alongside online communities and their general handiness for social and informational support of diabetics.

Furthermore, interdisciplinary approaches to diabetes care have been shown to foster coordination, communication, and patient outcomes by leveraging the authority of healthcare professionals from various disciplines.

Notwithstanding the headway made in diabetes management, openings in current information drive forward, particularly regarding the long-term impact of DSME programs, the best blueprint for online support platforms, and the flexibility of interdisciplinary care models. Future research should address these openings for additional work on the effectiveness and responsiveness of diabetes care interventions.

In conclusion, proof-based practice is the principal strategy for informing individuals about the new development and the implementation of diabetes self-management education programs. By integrating research findings into clinical practice, healthcare providers can streamline diabetes care conveyance, work on patient outcomes, and finally, work on the quality of life for individuals with diabetes.

References

Al-Badri, M., & Hamdy, O. (2021). Diabetes clinic reinvented: Will technology change the future of diabetes care? Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 12, 204201882199536.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018821995368

Ali, M. K., Chwastiak, L., Poongothai, S., Emmert-Fees, K. M. F., Patel, S. A., Anjana, R. M., Sagar, R., Shankar, R., Sridhar, G. R., Kosuri, M., Sosale, A. R., Sosale, B., Rao, D., Tandon, N., Narayan, K. M. V., & Mohan, V. (2020). Effect of a collaborative care model on depressive symptoms and glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and serum cholesterol among patients with depression and diabetes in India. JAMA, 324(7), 651.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.11747

Andrich, D., & Foronda, C. (2020). Improving glycemic control and quality of life with diabetes self-management education: A pilot project. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 51(3), 119–123.

https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20200216-06

Appuswamy, A. V., & Desimone, M. E. (2020). Managing diabetes in hard-to-reach populations: A review of telehealth interventions. Current Diabetes Reports, 20(7).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-020-01310-2

Basinger, E. D., Farris, M., & Delaney, A. L. (2019). Investigating the experience of diabetes stigma in online forums. Southern Communication Journal, 85(1), 43–57.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2019.1655662

Carmienke, S., Baumert, J., Gabrys, L., Heise, M., Frese, T., Heidemann, C., & Fink, A. (2020). Participation in structured diabetes mellitus self-management education program and association with lifestyle behavior: results from a population-based study. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 8(1), e001066.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001066

Carmienke, S., Fink, A., Baumert, J., Heidemann, C., Du, Y., Frese, T., & Heise, M. (2021). Participation in structured diabetes self-management education programs and its associations with self-management behavior – A nationwide population-based study. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(4).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.017

Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K., Benbasat, I., Xiao, B., & Lee, Z. W. Y. (2022). Bystanders join in cyberbullying on social networking sites: The deindividuation and moral disengagement perspectives. Information Systems Research, 34(3).

https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1161

Chidera Victoria Ibeh, Oluwafunmi Adijat Elufioye, Temidayo Olorunsogo, Onyeka Franca Asuzu, Ndubuisi Leonard Nduubuisi, & Andrew Ifesinachi Daraojimba. (2024). Data analytics in healthcare: A review of patient-centric approaches and healthcare delivery. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 1750–1760.

https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0246

Coningsby, I., Ainsworth, B., & Dack, C. (2022). A qualitative study exploring the barriers to attending structured education programs among adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07980-w

Davidson, P., LaManna, J., Davis, J., Ojeda, M. M., Hyer, S., Dickinson, J. K., Todd, A., Hammons, T. M., Mohammed Fahim, S., McDaniel, C. C., McKee, C. A., Clements, J. N., Yehl, K., Litchman, M. L., Blanchette, J. E., & Kavookjian, J. (2022). The effects of diabetes self-management education on quality of life for persons with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care, 48(2), 111–135.

https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106211070266

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic literature reviews. Repositorio.grial.eu.

https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/2849

Garrido‐Hernansaiz, H., & Alonso‐Tapia, J. (2020). Predictors of anxiety and depression among newly diagnosed people living with HIV: A longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(5), 616–624.

https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12621

Griauzde, D. H., Ling, G., Wray, D., DeJonckheere, M., Mizokami Stout, K., Saslow, L. R., Fenske, J., Serlin, D., Stonebraker, S., Nisha, T., Barry, C., Pop-Busui, R., Sen, A., & Richardson, C. R. (2022). Continuous glucose monitoring with low-carbohydrate nutritional coaching to improve type 2 diabetes control: randomized quality improvement program. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(2), e31184.

https://doi.org/10.2196/31184

Jain, S. R., Sui, Y., Ng, C. H., Chen, Z. X., Goh, L. H., & Shorey, S. (2020). Patients and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0237647.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237647

Kamei, F., Wiese, I., Lima, C., Polato, I., Nepomuceno, V., Ferreira, W., Ribeiro, M., Pena, C., Cartaxo, B., Pinto, G., & Soares, S. (2021). Grey literature in software engineering: A critical review. Information and Software Technology, 138, 106609.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106609

Khan, D. A. R., & Iqbal, D. S. (2023). Current trends in stroke rehabilitation: Novel therapeutic approaches. Review Journal of Neurological & Medical Sciences Review, 1(1), 11–18.

https://rjnmsr.com/index.php/rjnmsr/article/view/2

Kolb, L. (2021). An effective model of diabetes care and education: The ADCES7 self-care behaviors The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care, 47(1), 30–53.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720978154

Kumah, E., Abuosi, A. A., Ankomah, S. E., & Anaba, C. (2021). Self-management education program: The case of glycemic control of type 2 diabetes. Oman Medical Journal, 36(1), e225–e225.

https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2021.01

Kumah, E., Afriyie, E. K., Abuosi, A. A., Ankomah, S. E., Fusheini, A., & Otchere, G. (2021). Influence of the model of care on the outcomes of diabetes self-management education program: A scoping review. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2021, 1–12.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2969243

Kurani, S. S., Lampman, M. A., Funni, S. A., Gibson, R. E., Inselman, J. W., Shah, N. D., Allen, S., Rushlow, D., & McCoy, R. G. (2021). Association between area-level socioeconomic deprivation and diabetes care quality in US primary care practices. JAMA Network Open, 4(12), e2138438.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38438

Lai, Y.-C., Chen, Y.-S., Jiang, Y.-D., Wang, C.-S., Wang, I-Ching., Huang, H.-F., Peng, H.-Y., Chen, H.-C., Chang, T.-J., & Chuang, L.-M. (2023). Diabetes self-management education on the sustainability of metabolic control in type 2 diabetes patients: Diabetes share care program in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2023.09.010

Litchman, M. L., Oser, T. K., Hodgson, L., Heyman, M., Walker, H. R., Deroze, P., Rinker, J., & Warshaw, H. (2020). In-person and technology-mediated peer support in diabetes care: A systematic review of reviews and gap analysis. The Diabetes Educator, 46(3), 230–241.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720913275

Monzón-Kenneke, M., Chiang, P., Yao, N. (Aaron), & Greg, M. (2021). Pharmacist medication review: An integrated team approach to serve home-based primary care patients. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0252151.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252151

Nguyen, N. X., Tran, K., & Nguyen, T. A. (2021). Impact of service quality on in-patients’ satisfaction, perceived value, and customer loyalty: A mixed-methods study from a developing country. Patient Preference and Adherence, 15, 2523–2538.

https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s333586

Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J. K., Cypress, M., Funnell, M. M., Harms, D., Hess-Fischl, A., Hooks, B., Isaacs, D., Mandel, E. D., Maryniuk, M. D., Norton, A., Rinker, J., Siminerio, L. M., & Uelmen, S. (2020). Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American diabetes association, the Association of diabetes care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American association of nurse practitioners, and the American pharmacists association. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 60(6), 1–18.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.018

Rutledge, N. (2021). Diabetes Education Empowerment Program (DEEP): Evidence-based practice measures for self-care management. Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.

https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/etds_nursing/47/

Siminerio, L. M., Krall, J., Johnson, P. A., Ruppert, K., Hammoudeh, R., Bandi, A., & Ng, J. (2023). Examining a diabetes self-management education and support telemedicine model with high-risk patients in a rural community. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology.

https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968231180884

Timpel, P., Lang, C., Wens, J., Contel, J. C., & Schwarz, P. E. H. (2020). The managed care model – Developing an evidence-based and expert-driven chronic care management model for patients with diabetes. International Journal of Integrated Care, 20(2), 2.

https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4646

Wit, M., Trief, P. M., Huber, J. W., & Willaing, I. (2020). State of the art: Understanding and integration of the social context in diabetes care. Diabetic Medicine, 37(3).

https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14226