NR 506 Week 4 Obesity Health Policy Analysis

NR 506 Week 4 Obesity Health Policy Analysis

Student Name

Chamberlain University

NR-506: Healthcare Policy

Prof. Name

Date

Week 4: Obesity Health Policy Analysis

Problem Statement

Should government officials proactively promote obesity interventions, programs, and education within rural areas?

Yes. Government officials should actively encourage obesity-related interventions and programs in rural regions. These communities often face limited access to healthcare, fewer recreational facilities, and higher poverty rates, which directly contribute to increased obesity levels. Proactive policies such as school-based health education, funding for nutritious foods, and community exercise opportunities can help reduce obesity prevalence while promoting long-term wellness.

Background

Knott County, Kentucky, reflects a concerning picture of obesity-related challenges. The statistics show an urgent need for public health action to reduce disparities and improve quality of life (County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, 2020).

These figures underscore the pressing need for comprehensive interventions that address both environmental and socioeconomic contributors to obesity.

Landscape

The obesity crisis involves multiple stakeholders, each shaped by political, economic, social, and quality-of-care dimensions. Collaboration among these groups is essential to develop sustainable and effective health policies.

Key Stakeholders

• Healthcare providers

• Food industry

• Health insurance industry

• Politicians (Democratic/Republican) and lobbyists

Stakeholder Analysis

Both Democratic and Republican leaders have supported legislative efforts addressing obesity. For instance, Bill H.R. 1530 (Democratic) and Bill S. 595 (Republican) were introduced in Congress to combat obesity-related health issues (Library of Congress, 2019).

Options

Add an Additional Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Snack Foods

Implementing a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages and unhealthy snack foods can target high-risk populations, including children, adolescents, and low-income families. Countries that have adopted similar taxation have achieved moderate success. However, this approach is most effective when combined with complementary health-promotion strategies (Cedeno, 2019).

Develop Free-of-Charge Exercise Locations

In communities lacking parks or fitness centers, schools could open gyms and playgrounds to the public. Offering group fitness classes for all age groups and creating safe walking or recreational areas would increase accessibility. Public recreation initiatives are proven to play a vital role in obesity prevention (Edwards et al., 2015).

Educate School-Age Children on Obesity Risks and Prevention

Knott County’s 98% high school graduation rate presents an ideal opportunity for integrating health education within schools (County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, 2020). Teachers could include obesity prevention topics in science or health curricula. Lesson plans could be reused to reduce costs but would require periodic updates to reflect current research.

Provide Funding for Fresh Vegetables

Financial assistance for families could be scaled according to household size. However, free access to vegetables does not necessarily ensure consumption due to personal preferences or cultural dietary patterns (Carty, Mainvil, & Coveney, 2017).

Recommendation

Educating School-Age Children on Obesity Risks and Preventative Measures

Education represents the most effective long-term solution for combating obesity. Teaching children about nutrition, portion control, and physical activity instills lifelong habits and influences their families’ choices as well. Schools can serve as catalysts for community-wide change by integrating obesity prevention into everyday learning.

Benefits:

• Influences both students and families

• Promotes lifelong healthy habits

• Encourages family bonding through shared cooking and activities

• Represents a relatively low-cost intervention

Challenges:

• Limited curriculum time

• Need for frequent updates as dietary guidelines evolve

• Possible resistance from families not prioritizing health behaviors

Despite these challenges, educational interventions remain central to sustainable obesity prevention, fostering early awareness and prevention rather than relying on treatment.

References

Carty, S. A., Mainvil, L. A., & Coveney, J. D. (2017). Exploring family home food environments: Household resources needed to utilize weekly deliveries of free fruits and vegetables. Nutrition & Dietetics, 74(2), 138–146.

Cedeno, L. (2019). Global implementation of soda taxes: Is there a better solution for combatting obesity? Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 45(1), 229–365.

County Health Rankings and Roadmaps. (2020). Explore rankings. Retrieved from https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/kentucky/2020/rankings/knott/county/outcomes/overall/snapshot

NR 506 Week 4 Obesity Health Policy Analysis

Edwards, M. B., Jilcott, S. B., Floyd, M. F., & Moore, J. B. (2015). County-level disparities in access to recreational resources and associations with adult obesity. Palaestra, 29(2), 39–54.

Library of Congress. (2019, March 16). Current legislation. https://www.congress.gov/search?q={%22congress%22:%22116%22,%22source%22:%22legislation%22,%22search%22:%22obesity%22}&searchResultViewType=expanded&KWICView=false

.