NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3
Sample FREE DOWNLOAD

Need Help Writing an Essay?
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper
Write My Essay For MeNURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3
Implementing Evidence-Based Practice
Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Note: All our papers are written from scratch by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.
Student name
Capella University
FPX 6011
Professor name
Submission Date
Implementing Evidence-Based Practice
Evidence-based healthcare practice is a combination of most appropriate research evidence, clinical knowledge and patient values into a unified decision-making model. It involves a systematic approach to locate, evaluate, and use pertinent scientific literature to promote clinical outcomes (Engle et al., 2021). To conduct this assessment, there will be a creation of a Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time-bound (PICOT) question that will be answering the problem of diabetes. The assessment will also work out an action plan, establish the primary opportunities, and describe the primary interests. The outcome criteria will be recommended, and the suitability of the evidence selected to support the change of practice will be discussed.
PICOT Question for a Clinical Problem
How the introduction of extensive community-based management interventions of diabetes, including education and lifestyle changes (I) versus the standard care (C) is associated with adherence to lifestyle changes and self-management of blood glucose levels (O) after six months (T) in the population of adult American Indians and Alaska Native (AI/AN) with diabetes (P) type 2 diabetes?
- Population (P): AI/AN with type 2 diabetes
- Intervention (I): Community-based diabetes management interventions, including education and lifestyle changes
- Comparison (C): Standard care
- Outcome (O): Improve adherence to lifestyle changes and self-management of blood glucose levels
- Timeline (T): Six months
Background
One of the health problems of the AI/AN populations is type 2 diabetes as the population experiences a high rate of diabetes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 13.6% of AI/AN adults were diagnosed with diabetes, and this is twice as many people as the non-Hispanic White group (6.9%) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2024). Some of the contributing factors are the presence of socioeconomic inequalities, lack of access to health, increased prevalence of obesity, and poor levels of physical exercise among populations. Rural, underserved locations that host AI/AN cannot receive several barriers to care services, including the distance or the resources required to understand the medical facility (Ottesen et al., 2022). The worst consequences of diabetes management are aggravated by poor management and high percentages of complications. Some of the interventions would be education and lifestyle change to enhance glycemic control (Shirvani et al., 2021). The intervention enhances treatment adherence and reduces the burdens of diabetes in the population.
Action Plan
Recommended Change
The provision of culturally complete community-based interventions is required in the first step of the evidence-based management of diabetes project among the AI/AN population. The measures will involve culturally applicable diabetes education, such as dietetic medicine, provisioning of traditional healthcare resources, mobile clinics and telemedicine, and lifestyle change assistance, which encompasses exercise programs and nutrition counseling (Powers et al., 2020). This cultural awareness and community involvement can be guaranteed by coalition building with tribal leaders and other health organizations, including the Indian Health Services (IHS) (Tobey et al., 2022). The development of such programs and integration of such interventions into the healthcare system, as well as educational training in terms of cultural sensitivity and diabetes management among healthcare practitioners are primary areas of concern because of which practice recommendations should be changed.
Timeline
The total period to be taken to complete the suggested project is less than six months. The project begins with a planning period, which takes one month, before the five months of mobilization. The community stakeholders and healthcare providers received training during the planning period of the implemented interventions. The registries concerning the diabetes education and lifestyle modification program implemented along with the mobile clinics and telemedicine services begin to work in the second and third months. The fourth and fifth months are associated with patient education, monitoring progress, and glycemic control feedback, which justifies the frequent workshops and involvement of the community (Karter et al., 2021). These activities are planned within the evaluation of the project outcome results in the 6th month to make adjustments and plan of action of future activities.
Tools and Resources Needed
The program will necessitate a mobile health workforce and telemedicine in distant locations, and community-specific educational materials. The community health workers and diabetes educators need additional training and regular maintenance to implement the intervention appropriately (Adams et al., 2020). In addition, local exercise and nutrition specialists, dietitians, and community centers are necessary in the project as well. Electronic health records (EHRs) will be employed during the data-gathering phase, and the progress and outcome monitoring of the patients will be carried out with the help of telehealth monitoring tools (Limketkai et al., 2021). The two tools are both realistically applicable to the patient care services to improve their longevity.
Stakeholders and Potential Barriers
Stakeholders
The stakeholders in this project are mainly the members of the diagnosed AI/AN type 2 diabetes community, the tribal elders, and the leaders. Nurses, physicians, community health representatives, and diabetes counselors will also be necessary in the implementation of the interventions (Marsh et al., 2021). The IHS, local health clinics, and public health agencies will be important partners that will provide some of the infrastructure and other resources towards the implementation of the project (Tobey et al., 2022). Policymakers, non profit making organizations, and funding bodies will undertake the sustaining and scaling of the project.
Opportunities for Innovation
The project can offer additional opportunities in the form of further development, such as the application of telemedicine and mobile health clinics in delivering diabetes care services to remote Indian AI/AN communities. Education, delivery of health services, and continuous monitoring of the patient can be improved with the help of technology applications, thus allowing personalized treatment to be offered at any specific place (Mbunge et al., 2021). The use of dieting and health beliefs culture in educating the patient in the form of books enhances adherence to treatments and attendance (Shapiro and Grajower, 2024). Similar to most projects, this project will be innovative in its approach to bridging the communication and trust between the AI/AN patients, who will have community health workers as the mediators.
Potential Barriers
There are some barriers that can disrupt the operation of this project. Stotz et al. (2023) contended that the issue of the healthcare services among the geographical AI/AN communities was an infrastructural intervention limitation. One of the issues raised in the research is the absence of patient involvement caused by culturally sensitive distrust, lack of understanding, and the inability to provide culturally sensitive care services. In addition to that, the limited resources provided by the community and the healthcare system contribute to additional woes, as the costs of mobile health units, telemedicine, and staffing are high.
Specific Actions Taken to Overcome Barriers.
Services like mobile health units, telemedicine, etc will be used to address the geographical as well as infrastructural issues. The community gives it trust by relying on the engagement with tribal leaders and elders to commit to culturally respected methods (Farai et al., 2023). The communication and patient engagement will be enhanced by utilizing and engaging community health workers who are familiar with the AI/AN culture (Karter et al., 2021). The project will also consider utilizing government grants or non-profit organizations to some extent, yet making use of the already available resources at IHS to save a significant amount of money (Tobey et al., 2022). Language barriers will be overcome by the use of bilingual educational materials and interpreters to make information available to all members of the community.
Propose Outcome Criteria
The main outcome measures are the reduced level of HbA1c in the participants, which leads to the enhancement of glycemic control (Grace & Slyer, 2021). Other outcome measures encompass the level of patient participation in self-management interventions like turn up in educational programs, life change interventions including nutrition and exercise, and health care using telemedicine or mobile clinics. Additional indicators will be patient satisfaction with diabetes care and adherence (Grace & Slyer, 2021). These results will be evaluated by conducting routine health checks, surveys, and EHR data within a six-month period (Limketkai et al., 2021). Regular follow-ups of the patient will be taken to assess the progress, and the community health workers will check in regularly to make sure that any obstacles to care are overcome.
Alignment with Quadruple Aim and Policy Impact.
Such results are in line with the Quadruple Aim related to the population health (improved glycemic control and management of diabetes), patient experience (culturally-sensitive, accessible care), the per capita healthcare cost reduction (deterrence of diabetes complications), and the well-being of providers (through telemedicine) (Dehkordi et al., 2024). The outcome measures will deliver valuable evidence to inform subsequent practice, policy, and guidelines regarding culturally-sensitive, community-based interventions in the care of diabetes (Grace and Slyer, 2021). The information can guide larger healthcare policies to encourage more vulnerable populations to use mobile health services and culturally competent care, which will make healthcare practices more equitable.
Evidence Supporting Change
The data on the change in diabetes management among AI/AN populations proves the high differences in diabetes prevalence and outcomes among the population. Research evidence that has been stored in databases like PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library indicates that AI/AN populations face relatively high levels of type 2 diabetes because of socioeconomic factors and lifestyle (Chopra et al., 2022). Saenz et al. (2024) reported the benefit of personalised community-based interventions, particularly in diabetes education and management lead to better participation and higher blood sugar control as compared to traditional care. These results explain the deficit in efficient culturally specific interventions in managing diabetes in this specific population, which is already known to be high risk of adverse health complications.
A systematic review methodology was employed in the literature search strategy that incorporated the following search terms namely, a systematic review, diabetes management in AI/AN population, community-based approach, diabetes telemedicine, and culturally specific care. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were used to obtain the literature, with the publication not older than five years. As Hilty et al. (2021) noted, telemedicine, mobile health units, and culturally relevant educational programs were useful to enhance the diabetes outcomes of patients. This evidence is plausible and relevant in the sense that it shows the extra-burden that AI/AN populations in underserved communities carry, which is the reason behind the emphasized change of practice.
Conclusion
The PICOT is focused on the diabetes management initiatives among AI/AN populations with a focus on the activities, which are oriented at achieving community-level responses to certain inadequacies of care that are relevant to this population. The project aims to enhance the glycemic control and engagement in the more favorable health outcomes by developing a project that incorporates teaching, active lifestyle, and access to healthcare via innovative telemedicine methods. This will involve taking into consideration the available literature, the input of the concerned stakeholders, and producing a plan that strategically aligns with the Quadruple Aim, hence combating the diabetes problem in this population in a sustainable way.
Step-By-Step Instructions To Write NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3
Get free sample from Top My Course to understand structure, APA formating and content.
Instructions for NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3: Implementing Evidence-Based Practice will be uploaded soon.
If you require the instructions on an urgent basis, please fill out the contact form with accurate information, and you will receive them in your inbox.
References for NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3
You can use these references on your NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3:
Adams, L. B., Richmond, J., Watson, S. N., Cené, C. W., Urrutia, R., Ataga, O., Dunlap, P., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2020). Community health worker training curricula and intervention outcomes in African American and Latinx Communities: A systematic review. Health Education & Behavior, 48(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120959326
Chopra, S., Lahiff, T. J., Franklin, R., Brown, A., & Rasalam, R. (2022). Effective primary care management of type 2 diabetes for indigenous populations: A systematic review. Public Library of Science (PLOS) ONE, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276396
Dehkordi, M., Hanson, H. M., Kennedy, M., & Wagg, A. (2024). Mapping quality indicators to assess older adult health and care in community, continuing, and acute-care settings: A systematic review of reviews and guidelines. Healthcare, 12(14), 1397–1397. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12141397
Engle, R. L., Mohr, D. C., Holmes, S. K., Seibert, M. N., Afable, M., Leyson, J., & Meterko, M. (2021). Evidence-based Practice and patient-centered care: Doing both well. Health Care Management Review, 46(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000254
Farai, O., Ogundairo, O., Maduka, C. P., Okongwu, C. C., Babarinde, A. O., & Sodamade, O. T. (2023). Telemedicine in health care: a review of progress and challenges in Africa. Matrix Science Pharma, 7(4), 124. https://doi.org/10.4103/mtsp.mtsp_24_23
Grace, T., & Slyer, J. (2021). Use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) improves glycemic control and other clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients treated with less intensive therapy. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 24(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0212
Hilty, D. M., Crawford, A., Teshima, J., Hilty, S. E., Luo, J., Chisler, L. S. M., Hilty, Y. S. M., Servis, M. E., Godbout, R., Lim, R. F., & Lu, F. G. (2021). Mobile health and cultural competencies as a foundation for telehealth care: Scoping review. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 6, 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00180-5
Karter, A. J., Parker, M. M., Moffet, H. H., Gilliam, L. K., & Dlott, R. (2021). Association of real-time continuous glucose monitoring with glycemic control and acute metabolic events among patients with insulin-treated diabetes. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 325(22), 2273–2284. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6530
Limketkai, B. N., Mauldin, K., Manitius, N., Jalilian, L., & Salonen, B. R. (2021). The age of artificial intelligence: use of digital technology in clinical nutrition. Current Surgery Reports, 9(7), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-021-00297-3
Marsh, Z., Nguyen, Y., Teegala, Y., & Cotter, V. T. (2021). Diabetes management among underserved older adults through telemedicine and community health workers. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 34(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000000595
Mbunge, E., Muchemwa, B., Jiyane, S., & Batani, J. (2021). Sensors and healthcare 5.0: Transformative shift in virtual care through emerging digital health technologies. Global Health Journal, 5(4), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2021.11.008
Ottesen, T. D., Amick, M., Kapadia, A., Ziatyk, E. Q., Joe, J. R., Sequist, T. D., & Harding, K. J. (2022). The unmet need for orthopaedic services among American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 104(11). https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00512
A consensus report of the American diabetes association, the Association of diabetes care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacists Association. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 60(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.018
Saenz, C., Salinas, M., Rothman, R. L., & White, R. O. (2024). Personalized lifestyle modifications for improved metabolic health: The role of cultural sensitivity and health communication in type 2 diabetes management. Journal of the American Nutrition Association, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/27697061.2024.2413368
Best Professors To Choose For NURS FPX 6011
-
Dr. Janet Balke (PhD, MSN, MHA, BSN)
-
Dr. Yvonne Alles (DHA, MSN)
-
Dr. Dan Fisher (PhD, MHA)
-
Dr. Linda Sperling (DHA, MHA, MSN, BSN)
FAQs Related NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3
What is the main focus of NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3?
Where can I download free samples for NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3?
What is the purpose of creating a PICOT question in this assessment?
{“@context”:”https://schema.org”,”@type”:”FAQPage”,”mainEntity”:[{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”What is the main focus of NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”This assessment focuses on implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) by integrating research evidence.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Where can I download free samples for NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”You can download free samples and expert-written guides from topmycourse.net for NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”What is the purpose of creating a PICOT question in this assessment?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”The PICOT question helps define a clear and focused clinical issue that guides the evidence search.”}}]}
The post NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3 Implementing Evidence-Based Practice appeared first on Top My Course.
Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.
ORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH


