NURS-FPX 6085 Assessment 3: Evidence Synthesis and Application 1. Purpose of the Assessment

Write my essay in 3 hours

Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Note:  All our papers are written from scratch by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

NURS-FPX 6085 Assessment 3: Evidence Synthesis and Application

1. Purpose of the Assessment

Assessment 3 focuses on:

• Synthesizing evidence from the literature review.

• Critically analyzing the quality, relevance, and applicability of the evidence.

• Applying findings to propose potential interventions or practice changes.

• Preparing for the practice change proposal in Assessment 4.

This step allows you to move from understanding the evidence to planning how it can be applied in a real-world clinical setting.

2. Common Requirements

Students are usually asked to:

1. Restate the clinical problem and PICOT question.

2. Summarize the key findings from the literature review (Assessment 2).

3. Critically analyze the strengths, limitations, and levels of evidence.

4. Identify patterns, gaps, or inconsistencies in the evidence.

5. Describe how the evidence can be applied to clinical practice.

6. Include APA 7th edition references.

3. Suggested Paper Structure

Title Page

• APA 7th edition formatting.

Introduction

• Restate the clinical problem and PICOT question.

• Explain why synthesizing evidence is important for practice change.

Evidence Synthesis

• Organize key studies by theme or intervention type.

• Summarize outcomes, effect sizes, and clinical significance.

• Highlight consistencies or discrepancies across studies.

Critical Analysis

• Evaluate the strengths and limitations of each study.

• Discuss level of evidence (e.g., Level I for RCTs, Level III for quasi-experimental).

• Identify gaps in the research or areas needing further study.

Application to Practice

• Explain how evidence supports a specific intervention.

• Describe the anticipated impact on patient outcomes.

• Consider feasibility, resources, and potential barriers in implementation.

Conclusion

• Summarize the main findings and their relevance to clinical practice.

• Reinforce the importance of evidence-based practice in improving patient outcomes.

References

• Include all scholarly sources cited, in APA 7th edition format.

4. Example Topic (Pressure Injury Prevention)

PICOT Question: In adult hospitalized patients at risk for pressure injuries (P), how does implementing a standardized repositioning protocol with pressure-relieving devices (I), compared to usual care without structured repositioning (C), affect the incidence of pressure injuries (O) during a four-week hospital stay (T)?

Evidence Synthesis

Study 1: Smith & Allen (2021)

• Design: Systematic review of 10 RCTs

• Sample: Hospitalized adults at risk for pressure injuries

• Intervention: Repositioning protocols with pressure-relieving devices

• Outcome: Incidence of pressure injuries

• Findings: Significant reduction in pressure injuries; high adherence improved outcomes

• Level of Evidence: Level I

Study 2: Brown & Davis (2020)

• Design: Quasi-experimental study

• Sample: 120 adult patients

• Intervention: Repositioning every 2 hours with specialized mattresses

• Outcome: Pressure injury development

• Findings: 25% reduction in pressure injuries; effectiveness influenced by staff compliance

• Level of Evidence: Level III

Study 3: Johnson et al. (2019)

• Design: Cohort study

• Sample: 150 patients in medical-surgical units

• Intervention: Staff education and pressure injury prevention bundles

• Outcome: Pressure injury rates

• Findings: Moderate reduction in incidence; education alone insufficient without protocols

• Level of Evidence: Level III

Critical Analysis

• Strengths: High-level studies provide strong evidence supporting repositioning protocols and pressure-relieving devices. Systematic review demonstrates consistency across multiple RCTs.

• Limitations: Lower-level studies have small samples and single-site designs, limiting generalizability. Staff adherence and education were critical factors in success.

• Gaps: Limited evidence on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of prevention bundles.

Application to Practice

• Proposed Intervention: Implement a standardized repositioning protocol every 2 hours, combined with pressure-relieving devices.

• Expected Outcomes: Reduced incidence of pressure injuries, improved patient comfort, and enhanced quality of care.

• Implementation Considerations: Staff training, workflow integration, monitoring adherence, and ensuring availability of pressure-relieving devices.

Conclusion

The evidence strongly supports the use of repositioning protocols and pressure-relieving devices to prevent pressure injuries in hospitalized adults. High-level studies demonstrate significant reductions in incidence when protocols are followed. Applying this evidence in clinical practice can improve patient safety, outcomes, and quality of nursing care.

References

• Brown, L., & Davis, R. (2020). Pressure-relieving devices and nursing interventions for pressure injury prevention: Evidence-based practices. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 110, 103707. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijns.2020.103707

• Johnson, P., Smith, R., & Adams, L. (2019). Staff education and prevention bundles for pressure injuries: A cohort study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(15–16), 3002–3010. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jcn.2019.28.15.3002

• Smith, J., & Allen, K. (2021). Effectiveness of repositioning protocols in preventing pressure injuries in hospitalized adults: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 36(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jncq.2021.36.3.200

• National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel. (2023). Prevention and treatment of pressure injuries: Clinical practice guidelines. https://www.npiap.com

Pay Someone to Write My Essay