PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical dilemma case study

PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical dilemma case study

Student Name

Capella University

PSY FPX 7543 Ethics and Multicultural Issues in Psychology

Prof. Name

Date

Case Study Overview

Scope of Competence and Accuracy in Teaching

Psychologists are mandated to adhere to the boundaries of their expertise, ensuring that their educational, teaching, and research activities align with their professional background, training, and qualifications (American Psychological Association [APA], 2010).

Ethical Considerations: Discrimination

Psychologists are proscribed from engaging in unjust discrimination in their professional endeavors based on various factors such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, among others (APA, 2010).

Ethical Comparison: Deontology vs. Utilitarianism

Deontology

• Prioritizes action over consequences.
• Emphasizes adherence to ethical rules.
• Places paramount importance on commitment to moral principles.

Utilitarianism

• Focuses on the consequences of an action.
• Ethical principles based on benefit and usefulness.
• Action varies depending on the situation.

Utilizing the Deontological Model for Ethical Decision Making

1. Identify the Dilemma: Recognize conflicts in ethical principles.
2. Gather Information: Understand the context and perspectives involved.
3. Consult the Code of Ethics: Refer to ethical guidelines relevant to the dilemma.
4. Develop a Plan of Action: Brainstorm potential actions considering risks and benefits.
5. Choose a Solution: Select a solution aligning with moral principles and maximizing prospects.
6. Implement the Plan: Put the chosen solution into action.

Jenny’s ethical quandary revolves around whether to accept an offer to teach Biopsychology despite feeling inadequately competent. According to the Deontological Model, she should engage in a dialogue with Professor Ben, expressing her concerns and eagerness to enhance her qualifications, thereby ensuring alignment with her moral principles (Mandal, Ponnambath, & Parija, 2016; Schildmann et al., 2010).

Proposed Resolution

Jenny will initiate an open conversation with Professor Ben, articulating her concerns regarding her competence and her enthusiasm for improving her qualifications. This approach not only upholds ethical conduct but also fosters professional growth (Radeke & Stahelski, 2020).

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical dilemma case study

Mandal, J., Ponnambath, D., & Parija, S. (2016). Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778182/?tool=pmcentrez&report=abstract

Radeke, M. K., & Stahelski, A. J. (2020). Altering age and gender stereotypes by creating the Halo and Horns Effects with facial expressions. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-0504-6

Schildmann, J., Gordon, J.-S., & Vollmann, J. (2010). Clinical ethics consultation theories and methods, implementation, evaluation. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/lib/capella/reader.action?docID=592373

PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical dilemma case study

Tseng, P.-E., & Wang, Y.-H. (2021). Deontological or Utilitarian? An Eternal Ethical Dilemma in Outbreak. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2565251589/fulltextPDF/3D999799CA0F466APQ/1?accountid=27965