Respiratory System Case Study Analysis solution
Need Help Writing an Essay?
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper
Write My Essay For Me| Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
| Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
| Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Ethics in The Workplace Instructions
| Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
| Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
| Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Ethics in The Workplace Instruction.
Respiratory System Case Study Analysis
Hello & Welcome to Week Four,
This week we will review the respiratory system. This week there is a quiz and a case study analysis. Below is the case study.
What’s Happening This Week?
| What do I have to do? | When do I have to do it? |
| Review your Learning Resources in Lecturio | Days 1–7, Week 4 |
| Lecturio Practice Quiz | Complete by Day 7 of Week 4 |
| Case Study Analysis | Complete by Day 7 of Week 4 |
A 38-year-old female presents to the emergency room with complaints of dyspnea and left leg pain. Patient reports that her left leg started feeling heavy a few days ago and has also been red since she returned from a recent trip. She denies any injury to her leg. She reports that she started having some dyspnea in the last 24 hours. Patient history is remarkable for systemic lupus erythematosus and a history of recent airplane travel. She is also taking oral birth control. Her bp is 130/84, heart rate 100, R 24, and temp is 100.4F. Physical exam reveals unilateral +2 pitting leg edema to left leg with erythema.
Looking forward to interacting with you all in this new week.
Dr. Wells
Culture and Growth of An Interdisciplinary Exploration
Please select one of the case studiesYour discussion should include a summary and critique of the case study. Also, the assignment should show how using an interdisciplinary perspective is beneficial to the issue discussed.
Guidelines for the case study summary/critique
A summary of a research article requires you to share the article’s key points so your reader can get a clear picture of what the article is about.
A critique requires you to critically read a piece of research and identify and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Case Study: Understanding Human Action
Case Study: Culture and Growth
Exploring Military Relevance paper
BOOK REVIEW GUIDANCE
General Guidelines
- 1250-1500 words (not including title page and bibliography)
- Page one is the cover page
- Last page is the bibliography
- double-spaced
- 12 point Times New Roman Font
- 1 inch margins
- You will cite using Chicago Manual of Style (academic standard for historical writing) https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/717/01/
- Use footnotes to cite sources of quotations
- Include a complete biography
- Example Citation for a Book by One Author as follows:
- You will only need citations if you use direct quotes from your book. Just simply cite the page number.
Footnotes Example (at the bottom of each page where citations have been used:
1.William Faulkner, Absalom, Absalom! (New York: Vintage Books, 1990), 271.
- Ibid., 277.
Bibliography (last page):
Faulkner, William. Absalom, Absalom!. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.
Use the following as an outline for the book review.
1) Provide an opening statement and overview. Who was the author? What is their background? Scholar, soldier, etc. What is the main theme of the book? What sources did the author use in writing this work? Was the book biased towards one side or another, or towards any individual?
2) What is the main relevance to the US Military? Lessons learned? Military/technological advancements? Decisive battle? Turning point in the war? Etc.
3) Provide your opinion? Did it clear any misconceptions you may have had? Would you recommend this reading? Did the reading assist your overall understanding of our military? Were there examples of exemplary leadership? Examples of poor leadership?
4) Provide a conclusion statement.
5) All assignments will be automatically submitted for plagiarism.
Empowering Women and LGBTQ+ Communities
The final work(4 pages, 12 points font size, double spaced, 1-inch margin)
Global Women’s Fund https://www.globalfundforwomen.org/
Outright Action International https://www.outrightinternational.org/
Amnesty International https://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/
Naz Foundation India http://nazindia.org/
China LGBT Awareness Campaign http://lgbtcampaign.org/en/about-campaign
Advancing Transgender Human Rights (South Africa) http://genderdynamix.org.za/
Astraea Foundation for Justice: https://www.astraeafoundation.org/
SONG: http://southernersonnewground.org/
Audre Lorde Project, Brooklyn: https://alp.org/
Blue Diamond Society Nepal: http://www.bds.org.np/
Bandhu Welfare Society, Bangladesh: http://www.bandhu-bd.org/
Sappho for Equality, Kolkata: http://www.sapphokolkata.in/
Transgender Law Center https://transgenderlawcenter.org/
Sappho for Equality https://www.sapphokolkata.in/
alQaws for Gender and Sexual Diversity in Palestinian Society
http://alqaws.org/about-us
Southerners on the Ground: https://southernersonnewground.org/
Hetrick Martin Institute https://hmi.org/
FAMILIA TQLM: https://familiatqlm.org/
Pride at Work https://www.prideatwork.org/
TGI Justice Project https://tgijp.org/
|
RUBRIC |
||||||
| Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology
58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
| Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
| Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
| You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow | ||||||
|
RUBRIC |
||||||
| Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology
58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
| Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
| Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
| You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow | ||||||
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Let our team of professional writers take care of your essay for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.
ORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH
