Restrictions on interest group lobbying

Watch the movie Casino Jack (2010) and CBS 60 minutes clips linked above.
Then, in an essay, answer below two questions.

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Write My Essay For Me

Restrictions on Interest Group Lobbying

Under current congressional rules, members of Congress and their staffs are severely limited in the size of gifts they can receive from lobbyists. Similar restrictions had existed for decades but were tightened in the mid-2000s after it was revealed that former congressional staffer-turned-lobbyist Jack Abramoff had used “golf junkets, free meals at the restaurant he owned, seats at sporting events, and, in some cases, old-fashioned cash” to lobby members of Congress. The current restrictions limit members and their staffs to accepting gifts only if they are valued at less than $50moreover, the total worth of the gifts that any lobbyist can give to a particular member of Congress or staffer is limited to $100 per year. Are these restrictions fair? Do they help or hurt the political process?

Keep the rules, and maybe tighten them.

Supporting this option seems like a no-brainer. These regulations are based on a sensible intuition that laws are needed to prevent well-funded, unscrupulous lobbyists from offering inducements to members of Congress and their staffs in return for policy change. Simply put, groups that can send people to Washington to wine and dine members of Congress, congressional staff, and bureaucrats, might gain a significant advantage over those who are unable to do so. Even if a fancy lunch doesn’t buy a legislator’s vote, it might help with accessthat is, give the group a chance to make their arguments and perhaps change some minds. In this way, rules that allow even small gifts create an advantage for some interest groups (those that can open a Washington office or hire lobbyists) and a disadvantage for others. As a result, many reform proposals would go further, preventing lobbyists from giving anything to a member of Congress, legislative staff, or bureaucrateven a cup of coffee.

Relax the rules (a little).

Some argue that worries about interest group influence seem a little overstated. Suppose an interest group takes some congressional staff out to lunch or invites them to an evening reception. Nice treatment might increase the chances that the staffers would meet with the group’s lobbyists or look at the group’s proposals. But congressional staff and the legislators they work for are going to support a group’s proposals only if they help the member’s constituents or if they move policy in a way the member favors, not just because of an interest group’s free lunch. Also, the targets of lobbying know what’s going onthey’re not going to think a lobbyist is their new friend and ally just because of a small gift.

Finally, there are downsides to tight controls on these gifts and perks. The current rules on lobbyists’ gifts create a lot of paperwork for members and their staffs, who have to file reports on just about anything they receive from a lobbyist, even if that individual is a former colleague, neighbor, or friend. The rules are also extremely complicatedfor example, legislators are allowed to eat the hors d’oeuvres provided at a reception, but they cannot sit down to a full meal without violating the gift restrictions. The disclosure requirements are also a burden to smaller interest groups and firms, which have to document everything they do on complex forms. As a result, members of Congress, their staff, interest groups, and lobbying firms spend considerable time and effort on documenting small gifts that are unlikely to have any effect on policy outcomes.

Q1: How does “Casino Jack” portray the methods and tactics used by Jack Abramoff and his associates to influence members of Congress and their staff?

Q2: Considering the administrative burden that compliance with gift restrictions imposes on both Congress members and lobbyists, to what extent do these regulations actually contribute to transparency and accountability in the political process?

Q3: In light of the argument that even minor gifts can influence policy decisions, how could regulations be reformed to ensure equitable access for all interest groups, including those with limited resources, without compromising ethical standards?